The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. 2.5 gigapixel picture
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

2.5 gigapixel picture

  • 7 Replies
  • 12169 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chimera (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
2.5 gigapixel picture
« on: 06/06/2005 16:25:10 »
This flash animation shows a composite picture of quite incredible detail- try the + to zoom in - until you can read a licence plate a mile off, or something... awesome:

http://www.tpd.tno.nl/Pics/DII/gigazoom/Delft2.htm
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #1 on: 06/06/2005 18:37:15 »
That is rather impressive. My camera is 16.7 Mega pix & I thought that was good!
Logged
 

Offline rosy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1015
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Chemistry
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #2 on: 07/06/2005 08:51:22 »
I think it is a collage of loads of smaller pictures all put together - so cool, but needs a very long exposure time ;)
Logged
 

Offline chimera (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #3 on: 07/06/2005 22:35:44 »
quote:
Originally posted by DoctorBeaver

That is rather impressive. My camera is 16.7 Mega pix & I thought that was good!



Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II - cor, lucky devil you...[:p]
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline sixelms

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 25
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #4 on: 07/06/2005 22:37:45 »
Do you think my old Polaroid can take pictures like that ?
Logged
 
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #5 on: 07/06/2005 22:49:46 »
Yeah, Rob - that's the 1. I picked it up on a trip to the states a while back.
I do a lot of wildlife photography & I needed something with very high res so I could fit a good zoom lens on it & shoot from a distance (getting too close to a lot of the animals spooks them)
Logged
 

Offline chimera (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #6 on: 07/06/2005 22:55:41 »
Love to play with one of those... mjam.

Yes, you could in theory make your own composite pictures with a simpler camera, sixelms. You could make several 'zoom' levels, but the important part is to 'stitch' the pix together, and for that they use adapted software from NASA that does the same with all these camerashots of satellites for instance, glueing them into one big picture, which is sometimes why a planet can look like 'patchwork'. It is... [:)]

found a nice 'unfinished'-looking example:

http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/JupiterSatellites/europa/europa_npole_6115.jpg

Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils - Hector Louis Berlioz
« Last Edit: 07/06/2005 23:01:04 by chimera »
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline qazibasit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 344
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: 2.5 gigapixel picture
« Reply #7 on: 09/06/2005 10:37:53 »
well i was expecting my 3.1 mega pixcel cam to be the best cam of the world coz no one needs more than 3.1 mega pix snap and 3.1 is enough for them.
Logged
"There is never too late to make a change".
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.349 seconds with 46 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.