The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
5 Replies
4594 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
archie bishop
(OP)
Jr. Member
20
Activity:
0%
Live long, and prosper
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
«
on:
16/04/2009 17:02:00 »
Though some of you might not believe it there is actually an archbishop of Canterbury
Regards,
archie bishop
Logged
Long live the Queen!
BenV
Naked Science Forum King!
1502
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
«
Reply #1 on:
16/04/2009 17:20:59 »
Dr Rowan Williams? When was his existence in question?
Logged
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
«
Reply #2 on:
16/04/2009 18:29:04 »
Quote from: BenV on 16/04/2009 17:20:59
Dr Rowan Williams? When was his existence in question?
I think just about every time he opens his mouth!!!
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
Chemistry4me
Naked Science Forum King!
7705
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 2 times
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
«
Reply #3 on:
17/04/2009 00:50:03 »
Are you him?
Logged
lyner
Guest
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
«
Reply #4 on:
17/04/2009 12:16:38 »
FOG
"Are you he?"
Logged
Chemistry4me
Naked Science Forum King!
7705
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 2 times
The archbishop of canterbury is real!!!
«
Reply #5 on:
17/04/2009 12:25:14 »
Thanks. No un/fortunately(?) I am not.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...