The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

my creation, the butterfly effect and maths

  • 18 Replies
  • 9904 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« on: 17/05/2009 09:20:22 »
Hi, (this question will require someone with strong maths skills)

Im curious as to what the likelihood of my creation is?

This is to say that if we go back through my biological decedents, everything they ever did had to be done that specific way or else the chaos theory would have prevented my personal creation. this is an ever growing web the further back in time we get, these webs had to ‘overlap with other’s over the course of history where by any interference that occurred is exactly what had to happen in order for my creation to occur. Put simply, pretty much everything from the start of time had to occur EXACTLY as it did or else the butterfly effect would have produced a completely different set of circumstance that would have not resulted in me. Consider the specific sperm that had to meet the respected eggs down your biological path, each one had to be the correct one every single time since beginning of sexual reproductive life. Before this every cell had to reproduce exactly how they did. Before life the formation of the planets and exact weather systems had to occur as they did, even as far back as the big bang ultimately were deciding factors

I’m not a mathematician but I firmly believe that this number is essentially infinity - 1
Logged
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #1 on: 17/05/2009 09:30:59 »
So you're saying that the probablity of your creation is ∞ - 1?
Logged
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #2 on: 17/05/2009 10:18:33 »
I think all things filtered in since the beginning of the universe, i.e from the big bang, that had to blast atoms out into the universe exactly as it did. Then we needed the formation of out galaxy/ solar system exactly as it did exactly when it did or the chaos theory would have prevented the precise conditions for our biological evolution to either you or I. Just consider every animal interaction since the 1st life had to do so or else the end product though possibly similar could never have been you or I personally. I used the expression infinity – 1, because I have no idea the actual figure and my theory is that the possibilities that could have happened since the big bang are infinite. Please I’d like to hear your thoughts.
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #3 on: 17/05/2009 10:26:08 »
Well I do not know what you are actually asking. What are you looking for exactly?
Logged
 

Offline Karen W.

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #4 on: 17/05/2009 10:44:35 »
I see what your saying and there had to be a set progression as if not even the slightest of changes would basically changed the outcome of life itself etc...Everything had to have had its place as if it had been laid out in a perfect plan and every step executed to perfection to complete the succession of life on eath and our universe. Is that what you mean......? 

Any one single change in the layout could and would have changed everything hat has ever been and and every mountain hill bug etc....
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 



Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #5 on: 17/05/2009 10:54:47 »
Sorry I’ll try and put it a little less hazy

For you or I to be here, talking to each other there has had to be a network of random yet precise occurrences that have happened constantly, since time began! I’m looking for an actual figure of what the approximate value of this chance is?

My ‘infinity-1’, represents the chaos theory in respect to us being here (the one value is you or I), it basically says that any other slight change would produce a different end result. I talk about the big bang because the slightest anomaly or fluctuation would have had devastating consequences and ultimately a different end result, this carried through to life begging and all the slight events that unfolded beteen the big bang and 1st life, then the web of life and how every action since 1st life had to follow this precise yet random path to us, and thus the possibilities are infinite. Hence where I got infinity – 1.
Logged
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #6 on: 17/05/2009 10:55:35 »
yes karen nail on the head
Logged
 

Offline Karen W.

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #7 on: 17/05/2009 11:13:40 »
I do not know the maths behind it but I do agree and understand what you are saying!
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #8 on: 17/05/2009 11:15:34 »
I guess a better equation may be

X =    1 /  n<00


Where by;

X is the probability of your creation
n < oo is a given number of immense magnitude though probably less than infinity
Logged
 



Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #9 on: 17/05/2009 11:24:00 »
Can anyone good at maths tell me if this equation works (in theory)?
Logged
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #10 on: 17/05/2009 12:04:00 »
oh and infinity - 1 (meant to mean infinity to 1, not minus one)
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #11 on: 17/05/2009 12:05:44 »
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh.....
Could have said that earlier mate!! [:D]
Logged
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #12 on: 17/05/2009 12:08:27 »
lol sorry boss, I wasn’t thinking from the flip side, could you tell me if the re-vamped equation works for this theoretical model?
Logged
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #13 on: 17/05/2009 12:15:44 »
What did you say 'n' was again?
Logged
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #14 on: 17/05/2009 12:22:22 »
the n<00 is meant to read ‘n less than infinity’,

 where ‘n’ is a theoretical number of immense magnitude less than infinity, though when I think about it now, it should possibly read less than or equal too infinity.
Logged
 

Offline _Stefan_

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 814
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • My Photobucket Album
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #15 on: 17/05/2009 17:15:41 »
Consider the fact that it didn't have to be you that was born, or that all those events that led to you didn't have to occur that way. So there's nothing "precise" about the history, it just looks that way post-hoc
Logged
Stefan
"No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish." -David Hume
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #16 on: 17/05/2009 18:16:23 »
What I actually mean by precise is, that every event has occurred through a process of random chance which in the end created me, so when I use the word precise I’m using it in a selfish context. As in, it was the ‘precise’ conditions to create me (I understand there was nothing special about it, like I said random chance).

I must not have made my self clear as it is the concept that it didn’t have to be me that makes this such a fascinating topic, the “infinite*” other possibilities that could have occurred,

*my argument is that there really where an infinite number of possibilities.
Logged
 



Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • Knight Light Haulage
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #17 on: 18/05/2009 08:46:15 »
1000 generations ago, one of your ancestors could have been in the wrong place at the wrong time, or a disturbed during copulation, so the entire ancestral line would have changed from that point. You would not be here, one of your parents would not have existed,one of your grandparents would not have existed, one of your great grandparents would not have existed etc. etc. I would say that the chances of any of us being here are >∞ - 1 (if such were possible). It is not just the circumstances of your ancestors which have determined the outcome of your ancestral line, it is also the circumstances of others. Had one of my ancestors been different and married someone from your ancestral line instead of your ancestor, neither of us would be here.

I don't think mathematics can account for pure chance.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 

Offline gray 1985 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
my creation, the butterfly effect and maths
« Reply #18 on: 18/05/2009 09:31:21 »
Yeah that’s the point I’m trying to make (I said webs overlapping) what I actually meant were interactions between ancestral line (not just from a sexual reproductive point of view) everything they did has consequences, and ultimately anything they ever did, if done differently would have prevented my creation, chaos wouldn’t allow it!

As for the mathematics, I’m more curious then anything else, i.e. has some truly awesome mathematician/scientist sat and worked out a figure as to the estimated outcomes with all variables included. And if not then;

The theoretical equation for any organism in existence must therefore (re-vamped) be

X = 1/∞ (x is the probability of existence)

As in, we are ‘the one’ in what is, a universe of infinite possibilities (like I say earlier think of all the random event also required in creating our planet, solar system galaxy since the big bang)

As there are ultimately infinite possibilities of what could have happened, even in speaking to you now we are in some way shape and form influencing the future.take a moment to think, just reading this sentence will slow what you down which carries its own ‘domino effect’, the ‘alternate consequences’ of what could have happened we will never be aware, and ultimately any posobility that could have occurred would have been faced with equally abundant crisis points.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.376 seconds with 75 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.