0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't know how to calculate oscillation. My evidence is the difference in body movements between the earlier missions and the later missions.
Firstly you are saying that none of the faking was actually done in space.
Secondly, you have no idea about the construction of the jacket so you can't predict how it should have behaved. Depending upon the construction - Rigid, springy, floppy - it could have moved in any way. I repeat my question - which bit of Science PROVES your point?
The truth about everything they did and how they did it will all come out later.
it's not stiff enough to carry the pressure from the top or the back to the corner
This is something I won't take sides on.
I wish they'd stick to the Roswell Incident and Kennedy for their conspiracy fun.
it's not stiff enough to carry the pressure from the top or the back to the corner what sort of Engineer speak is that? What 'pressure'? This is basically a transverse wave you're discussing - doesn't it involve tension and torque?
O no! I don't know why I'm bothering. There is a laser reflector on the moon (actually there are now five I believe) which was left by the Apollo 11 mission in 1969. Further ones were placed by Apollo 14 and 15 missions and another two by some unmanned Russian craft (only one of these is operating though). These passive devices can be detected on earth by anyone with the right equipment and the first one was used to get a lot of information about the moon's orbit in the first 25 years since it was placed there. Use is not restricted to NASA. Are the conspiracy theorist now saying that the conspiracy is an international one involving loads of Universities in the world as well as government organisations
The radio signals that came back must have come from the moon or the Russians would have had an absolute field day denouncing the US
Someone would have talked by now; given the timescale there would have been a few deathbed confessions.
What makes you think the press would report anything like that? The press is controlled. We're just led to believe it's independent.
Believing the landings were faked is beyond ridiculous, and anyone stupid enough to believe it is either paranoid or delusional.The beaver has spoken. Now stop this absurdity!
Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 09/08/2008 11:33:38Believing the landings were faked is beyond ridiculous, and anyone stupid enough to believe it is either paranoid or delusional.The beaver has spoken. Now stop this absurdity!Agreed, is there a moderator around who would wish to lock this topic?