0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
be interested.The proposal is based on a single observation related to inductive laws. These laws state that changing electric fields induce magnetic fields and changing magnetic fields induce electric fields. But no-one has proved the existence of an electric field in a magnet on magnet interaction. That got me started. http://rosemaryainslie.blogspot.com/I have proposed that the magnetic fields comprises particles. I've called them tachyons,magnetic dipoles with the velocity of 2c. That's the first question. Is it classically considered possible that any particle can exceed the speed of light?
Because it's been measured to be c, not 2c.
You know Jerry - I actually think that your dot-wave theory could so be like my own. I also need those dots. Did you read the model? It's way too obtuse. But there are definite similarities. My own dots fill a toroid in a series of really thin strings. But they always join. Very structured fields.
Thanks JerryGG38 - from all kinds of levels. [:X]I agree, but I'm trying to get to any argument that categorically allows for greater than light speed? I first thought that I had it in E=mc^. Because - a photon has NO MASS then E times anything at all would still be zero. So. My argument was this, if the photon itself has no energy then self-evidently something else is moving the photon.Then I learned that actually that equation was modified so that its energy was then in its velocity. But if that's true, then by the same token we can attribute velocity to anything and at any value. The hard part would be to try and prove the existence of that 'faster than light' thing?
Golly JerryGG38. Your ideas blow me away. I couldn't resist reading it through. But I'm finished. I need to walk the dogs and get to bed. I'll answer you tomorrow.
I know nothing of Lorenz equations Vern.
Your meson analogy is brilliant. It could go some way to proving superluminal communication. But I'm not sure. The point is that in a particle pair, the one adjusts its spin in response to another, even when the one is artificially adjusted. Vern disputes that this is proven. I'm still looking for the proof of this. But it's published. Somewhere. I'll check.
Now, if something is exceeding the velocity of our measuring instruments then, by my definition, it's operating in another dimension.