The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Is static elecricity really this powerfull?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is static elecricity really this powerfull?

  • 4 Replies
  • 4963 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GemmaD (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
Is static elecricity really this powerfull?
« on: 26/06/2009 14:19:42 »
I came across these videos on YouTube of people producing explosive results with static electricity. Can any of these be done?

Logged
 



Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
Is static elecricity really this powerfull?
« Reply #1 on: 26/06/2009 15:05:38 »
Nope, at least not at the levels of static electricity that they were achieving.  Also, the person's finger tip, at the very least, would have suffered similar effects to the food.

And please don't double post questions in several places - you'll get a reputation as a spammer.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline Shadec

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
Is static elecricity really this powerfull?
« Reply #2 on: 27/06/2009 03:44:32 »
Quote from: LeeE on 26/06/2009 15:05:38
Nope, at least not at the levels of static electricity that they were achieving.  Also, the person's finger tip, at the very least, would have suffered similar effects to the food.
hes right, i cant think how they could have done it, but its most likely not real. the pain of high levels of static discharging through small points is high, it would have let a charred hole in his finger, most likely.
to build up that much charge, he would have to be walking on plates of mica or rubber, to stop it disharging.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Is static elecricity really this powerfull?
« Reply #3 on: 27/06/2009 18:02:52 »
Static electricity can do that sort of thing, but you need a thunderstorm to do it.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Shadec

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
Is static elecricity really this powerfull?
« Reply #4 on: 30/06/2009 09:30:31 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/06/2009 18:02:52
Static electricity can do that sort of thing, but you need a thunderstorm to do it.
ahaha, exactly.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.28 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.