The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?

  • 15 Replies
  • 8723 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« on: 14/07/2009 02:31:06 »
The following posts were split from this topic:
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=24232.msg263713#msg263713
To form this new topic!


WELL PLANETS ARE ROUND OR CIRCULAR IN SHAPE...SO I THOUGHT WHAT IF, AND IF SO WHAT WOULD IT BE LIKE.."NEIL THOUGHT IT A GOOD QUESTION SO THERE YOU ARE.

Yep.. That would be cool I wonder what we would look like on a triangular planet... would our appearance be different due also to the difference in the gravitational pull I would expect there to be if it were triangular?
« Last Edit: 14/07/2009 13:40:06 by Karen W. »
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 



Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #1 on: 14/07/2009 02:34:02 »
Quote from: Karen W. on 14/07/2009 02:31:06
Yep.. That would be cool I wonder what we would look like on a triangular planet... would our appearance be different due also to the difference in the gravitational pull I would expect there to be if it were triangular?

This is a good question mam,

Say it was actually possible to have the planet as a 3d triangle !...it's worth getting some of the klevur bods here to postulate what life would be like....
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #2 on: 14/07/2009 02:34:58 »
Some people would weigh a lot more than others, they might also be shorter.
Logged
 

Offline neilep

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #3 on: 14/07/2009 02:39:56 »
It would be quite freaky at the pointy ends !!
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #4 on: 14/07/2009 02:42:28 »
Yes, you might just find yourself floating off into space somewhere.
Logged
 



Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #5 on: 14/07/2009 02:45:47 »
Quote from: Chemistry4me on 14/07/2009 02:42:28
Yes, you might just find yourself floating off into space somewhere.

That might be a problem and what about the oxygen.. how much would that have been changed?
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #6 on: 14/07/2009 05:27:58 »
Quote from: neilep on 14/07/2009 02:39:56
It would be quite freaky at the pointy ends !!

Maybe but cool! Pivot around on points!
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #7 on: 14/07/2009 09:56:44 »
The ancient Egyptians believed that all life emerged from a pyramid. Are you suggesting they could have been right?
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 

Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #8 on: 14/07/2009 13:44:17 »
No... I am merely wondering what would have to be in place to create a triangular planet.. actually any different shaped planet! And if the atmosphere and gravitational effects were two drastically change what those effects might do to the shape of an existing planet as well as a newly forming one? Purely a fun Hypothetical sci fi kind of question.. ok?
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 



Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #9 on: 14/07/2009 15:48:17 »
First of all, the shape of gravity wouldn't match the shape of the planet.  Although the shape of gravity on a triangular planet (let's assume a triangular prism for the sake of simplicity) wouldn't be (nearly) spherical, as it is on Earth, most of the mass would still be concentrated around the center of the prism, so as C4M says, some people would weigh more than others.

If we pretend, for the moment, that the sides were perfectly smooth and there was no atmosphere, a ball released at the top of one of the points would roll 'down' to the center of the face and then 'up' the other side.  It's path would be straight, however.

An atmosphere, and any water, would follow the shape of gravity.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #10 on: 19/07/2009 10:51:11 »
Oooh thats a weird thought!

Quote from: Chemistry4me on 14/07/2009 02:34:58
Some people would weigh a lot more than others, they might also be shorter.

C4M why would they be shorter?
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #11 on: 19/07/2009 10:58:28 »
Quote from: LeeE on 14/07/2009 15:48:17
First of all, the shape of gravity wouldn't match the shape of the planet.  Although the shape of gravity on a triangular planet (let's assume a triangular prism for the sake of simplicity) wouldn't be (nearly) spherical, as it is on Earth, most of the mass would still be concentrated around the center of the prism, so as C4M says, some people would weigh more than others.

If we pretend, for the moment, that the sides were perfectly smooth and there was no atmosphere, a ball released at the top of one of the points would roll 'down' to the center of the face and then 'up' the other side.  It's path would be straight, however.

An atmosphere, and any water, would follow the shape of gravity.



Lee could you draw me a diagram to make that easier for me to grasp..cause I do not get how the water would run back up the other side?

There is no atmosphere right...meaning? Lack of oxygen carbondioxide or other gases?I need the kindergarten version here!..LOL

Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #12 on: 19/07/2009 11:17:21 »
You can only have triangular (or more accurately tetrahedral)objects that are small once they get more than a few hundred miles across the self gravity forces the materials into the more stable shape which is spherical. If such a tetrahedral planet existed  The atmosphere which is fluid will adopts a basically spherical shape with an exponential fall of pressure with height above the surface and so would "pool" at the points closest to the centre of gravity in the middles of the four triangular faces of the tetrahedron while the points which are like very high mountains on the earth would virtually stick out into space.

If such a structure could be stable and inhabited you could have four completely isolated ecosystems with effectively disc-world properties.  it would feel like you were in a bowl and the hills got steeper as you went away from the centre.  you wouldn't fall off the edge you would need space suits to climb the mountain to get over the very steep "cliff" to reach the other part of the community.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #13 on: 19/07/2009 11:40:08 »
Wow now that is kinda interesting! Very interesting! Thanks Ian!
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #14 on: 19/07/2009 11:41:30 »
Hi Karen.  I said a ball would roll back up the other side, not water.  As I said, water would follow the shape of gravity, which would more or less be the shape of a lobate sphere (roughly spherical but with lobes).

The ball behaviour would be even more interesting with a true tetrahedral planet as it would be rolling from an apex to a base.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline Karen W. (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *****
  • 31886
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • "come fly with me"
What would have to change atmospherically to have a triangular shaped planet?
« Reply #15 on: 19/07/2009 11:52:15 »
Quote from: LeeE on 19/07/2009 11:41:30
Hi Karen.  I said a ball would roll back up the other side, not water.  As I said, water would follow the shape of gravity, which would more or less be the shape of a lobate sphere (roughly spherical but with lobes).

The ball behaviour would be even more interesting with a true tetrahedral planet as it would be rolling from an apex to a base.

Your right.. sorry I meant the ball!LOL

For some reason I am not catching on without diagrams...
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.562 seconds with 62 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.