The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?

  • 6 Replies
  • 9767 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ScientificBoysClub

  • Guest
Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
« on: 09/09/2009 16:37:56 »
Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?

Many physicist considered Ed Witten as true successor of Einstein, why ?
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 10/08/2025 09:52:45

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
    « Reply #1 on: 10/09/2009 00:19:47 »
    Dont know ed witten and you have not explained the context so can't reply without further clarification.
    Logged
    Learn, create, test and tell
    evolution rules in all things
    God says so!
     

    Offline JP

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3346
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
    Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
    « Reply #2 on: 10/09/2009 06:00:23 »
    Witten is one of (if not the) most successful and influential string theorists and his work has had a great deal of influence in mathematics as well as in physics.  If you believe that string theory will end up being the successor to general relativity, then Witten is quite possibly the biggest name in the field.  I'm not sure comparing physicists who lived half a century apart and worked on different theories makes much sense, but Witten is certainly an important figure in modern physics and mathematics.
    Logged
     

    ScientificBoysClub

    • Guest
    Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
    « Reply #3 on: 10/09/2009 09:51:17 »
    Quote from: Soul Surfer on 10/09/2009 00:19:47
    Dont know ed witten and you have not explained the context so can't reply without further clarification.
    I know him, He is cool at string theory. He has solved some problems in string theory. Like we used to have problem in Unifying the Laws of fundamental forces of Nature.

    We have successfully unified, with the help of his math concepts. I don't know his biography but only something about him..
    Logged
     

    Offline Nizzle

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • 963
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 6 times
    • Extropian by choice!
      • Carnivorous Plants
    Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
    « Reply #4 on: 10/09/2009 16:21:17 »
    He's the 'inventor' of M-theory, the theory that unites the 5 string theories that were theorized before M-theory
    Logged
    Roses are red,
    Violets are blue.
    Most poems rhyme,
    but this one doesn't
     



    ScientificBoysClub

    • Guest
    Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
    « Reply #5 on: 10/09/2009 17:31:20 »
    Quote from: Soul Surfer on 10/09/2009 00:19:47
    Dont know ed witten and you have not explained the context so can't reply without further clarification.
    If you really don't want to reply why do u make comments like this ...??
    Just live me alone ..
    Logged
     

    Offline Soul Surfer

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3389
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 8 times
    • keep banging the rocks together
      • ian kimber's web workspace
    Why Ed Witten is considered as Einstein's true successor ?
    « Reply #6 on: 15/09/2009 23:46:47 »
    You must not assume that everyone knows all the facts that you do and when you pose a question it is important to include some context.  OK I could easily have googled the name and found this out but I do feel that you should have expressed this yourself.

    I can now answer your question.  I do not deny the great skills and insight of the mathematics behind string theory and am reasonably sure that some aspects of it are important but until such theories are proved to link into our observations of the universe I would not think that this ultimate accolade should be awarded.  Also in modern science a major discovery is very seldom down to a single person and to fail to  include the full chain of contributors is bad.  Most of the great scientists recognise the work of others.
    « Last Edit: 15/09/2009 23:54:12 by Soul Surfer »
    Logged
    Learn, create, test and tell
    evolution rules in all things
    God says so!
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 1.82 seconds with 44 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.