0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Probably the most well known case of atavism is found in the whales. According to the standard phylogenetic tree, whales are known to be the descendants of terrestrial mammals that had hindlimbs. Thus, we expect the possibility that rare mutant whales might occasionally develop atavistic hindlimbs. In fact, there are many cases where whales have been found with rudimentary atavistic hindlimbs in the wild (see Figure 2.2.1; for reviews see Berzin 1972, pp. 65-67 and Hall 1984, pp. 90-93). Hindlimbs have been found in baleen whales (Sleptsov 1939), humpback whales (Andrews 1921) and in many specimens of sperm whales (Abel 1908; Berzin 1972, p. 66; Nemoto 1963; Ogawa and Kamiya 1957; Zembskii and Berzin 1961). Most of these examples are of whales with femurs, tibia, and fibulae; however, some even include feet with complete digits.
From the way that the the snake has twisted the front half of its body through nearly 360 degrees - the paler coloured band with parallel scales is its belly - suggests that it's in distress.
I should think so - the lady that found it beat it to death with a shoe.
SourceFound in China, I think the picture says it all.
Quote from: AllenG on 16/09/2009 21:29:51SourceFound in China, I think the picture says it all. Very much expected.Early on in my biology classes, i learned that snakes have a biological or skeletol makeup which suggests at some distant past their ancestors did in fact walk upright; which has bizarre religious consequences for some.This is a basic case of an evolutionary-throwback. It's genes have been awoken by some strange genetic mistake that has resided dorment until this occurance.
Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 24/09/2009 00:09:58Quote from: AllenG on 16/09/2009 21:29:51SourceFound in China, I think the picture says it all. Very much expected.Early on in my biology classes, i learned that snakes have a biological or skeletol makeup which suggests at some distant past their ancestors did in fact walk upright; which has bizarre religious consequences for some.This is a basic case of an evolutionary-throwback. It's genes have been awoken by some strange genetic mistake that has resided dorment until this occurance. so why just the one fully formed leg? Surely the gene for 'creating limbs' isn't that discriminatory.. I would expect at least stumps where the other leg/s should have been .