The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Just Chat!
Shrinking Shatner ?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Shrinking Shatner ?
6 Replies
5657 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
on:
05/11/2009 16:22:35 »
Waxy Bill is 2"-3" taller than fleshy Bill...
[ Invalid Attachment ]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8343694.stm
«
Last Edit: 05/11/2009 16:32:26 by RD
»
Logged
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
Reply #1 on:
05/11/2009 16:40:20 »
It's life Jim, but not as we know it.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
Reply #2 on:
05/11/2009 20:04:14 »
The effigy's hair is very accurate, (perhaps Bill donated his 1980s syrup).
«
Last Edit: 05/11/2009 20:05:45 by RD
»
Logged
AllenG
Hero Member
503
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
Reply #3 on:
05/11/2009 23:40:51 »
The Star Trek go-go boots have quite a heel.
Logged
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
Reply #4 on:
06/11/2009 01:42:17 »
Quote from: AllenG on 05/11/2009 23:40:51
The Star Trek go-go boots have quite a heel.
Not 2" - 3" ...
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Actors heights are sometimes exaggerated on their CVs, perhaps waxy Bill was constructed to false specifications.
«
Last Edit: 06/11/2009 01:44:50 by RD
»
Logged
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
Reply #5 on:
06/11/2009 18:22:19 »
I'm ashamed to admit that I can date the waxwork from its costume (and its bouffant syrup) :
it's from the mid-late 1980s Star Trek movies, not the late 1960s TV show.
«
Last Edit: 06/11/2009 18:25:43 by RD
»
Logged
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Shrinking Shatner ?
«
Reply #6 on:
08/11/2009 12:08:13 »
. [ Invalid Attachment ]
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...