The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. Science Experiments
  4. Double Slit Experiment
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Double Slit Experiment

  • 3 Replies
  • 12569 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Return of Matt Damon

  • Guest
Double Slit Experiment
« on: 06/11/2009 20:28:34 »
Double Slit Experiment

Have they tried it with four slits and one observer on one of the slits, like below.

And would you get a patten like A or B.


Logged
 



Offline Tony_82

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 22
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Best Answer
  • Double Slit Experiment
    « Reply #1 on: 10/11/2009 16:34:56 »
    I say A.
    Logged
     

    Offline werc

    • First timers
    • *
    • 7
    • Activity:
      0%
  • Best Answer
  • Double Slit Experiment
    « Reply #2 on: 28/11/2009 14:29:19 »
    maybe there are other way to explain the Double Slit Experiment


    newbielink:http://www.albertavevaragione.com/index.php?id=7&lang=en [nonactive]
    Logged
     

    Offline Mr. Scientist

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1451
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 2 times
    • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
      • Time Theory
  • Best Answer
  • Double Slit Experiment
    « Reply #3 on: 01/12/2009 21:17:39 »
    Why fix what is not broken? We have been using standard wave mechanics to describe systems since the first realization of wavicle phenom. I just don't see why we should make things difficult.
    Logged

    ''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

     ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

    ٩๏̯͡๏۶
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 1.04 seconds with 34 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.