The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?

  • 16 Replies
  • 8564 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ...lets split up... (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 102
  • Activity:
    0%
  • I love lamp
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« on: 20/11/2009 07:38:02 »
I am wondering why there is an excess of positive matter in the universe?
I've thumb sucked my own unsupported ideas but i am interested in any other theories as to why this is.

Much appreciated.
Logged
I love lamp
 



Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #1 on: 20/11/2009 09:00:25 »
You already know a theory of mine, so yeh this should be an intetesting discussion.
Logged

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶
 

Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #2 on: 20/11/2009 15:56:28 »
This is anyone's guess, so I'll state a speculative notion that I came up with a week or so ago.

The most elemental particles of matter are always created in pairs, one positive, one negative as in an electron and a positron. Constituents of nuclei are smaller more energetic electron-like particles, again, created in pairs. These smaller particles can come together to form atomic nuclei, or decay back to pure energy.

A proton consists of three such particles. This is an odd number. One partner of a pair is left out. The left-out partner becomes pure energy. So we have pair creation, but single particle inhalation.

This is the cause of the dominance of normal matter over antimatter.



 
« Last Edit: 20/11/2009 15:58:38 by Vern »
Logged
 

Offline PhysBang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 706
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #3 on: 20/11/2009 16:40:03 »
Quote from: ...lets split up... on 20/11/2009 07:38:02
I am wondering why there is an excess of positive matter in the universe?
I've thumb sucked my own unsupported ideas but i am interested in any other theories as to why this is.

Much appreciated.
The official answer is: we don't know.

A more detailed answer is that there is some physical principle at work in high energy physics such that at some point, more positive matter was created than anti-matter.
Logged
Naked Scientists values: support moderators who try to demean posters by suggesting that they are Catholic, support moderators who ignore homophobic and transphobic threads, support moderators who promote climate change denial.
 

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #4 on: 20/11/2009 18:55:45 »
Quote from: PhysBang on 20/11/2009 16:40:03
Quote from: ...lets split up... on 20/11/2009 07:38:02
I am wondering why there is an excess of positive matter in the universe?
I've thumb sucked my own unsupported ideas but i am interested in any other theories as to why this is.

Much appreciated.
The official answer is: we don't know.

A more detailed answer is that there is some physical principle at work in high energy physics such that at some point, more positive matter was created than anti-matter.

yes spontaneous symmetry breaking, but i think verns idea was neet.
Logged

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶
 



Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3384
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #5 on: 20/11/2009 23:20:58 »
The currently favoured reason is a small asymmetry which has been observed in the decay products of B mesons which were important in the very early stages of the big bang.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #6 on: 20/11/2009 23:47:11 »
Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 20/11/2009 09:00:25
You already know a theory of mine, so yeh this should be an intetesting discussion.
This is an excellent question, and i want you to post this in the forum, with my added suggestion of the inequality.


Recently, there was discovered a black region (not of a black hole configuration) but one which was devoid of matter and energy... give or take a few loose particles that must be around, fluctuating from the vacuum. Anyhow, this hole was far too big and still is remaining a paradox against the big bang theory for it stretched for millions of lightyears, and no theoretical explanation can suffice. If the big bang theorists where so adiment towards the math, then why is the observation of this hole so evident and most of all unpredicted?

My guess, is that there was no spontaneous symmetry breaking, but rather a very cleverly orchestrated gravitational twist near the beginning of time (about 4 billion years after expansion) finally had a massive burst of energy, where most of the antimatter in the universe dissipated back to radiative energy (photons). It seems that this early collision is a theory at best, but one which works well if quantum physics big bang enthusiasts wish to keep their theory alive.
Logged

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶
 

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #7 on: 22/11/2009 12:03:29 »
I assume you're talking about matter and anti-matter here.

As well as the observed asymmetry that SoulSurfer has pointed out, for the amount of matter to perfectly equal the amount of anti-matter precisely equal amounts of both would have needed to have been created and considering the scale of the universe, and the chaotic conditions of the Big Bang, this seems very unlikely to me.

Another possible mechanism is to view the BB in a very simplified and abstract way: imagine it as starting with a single abstract value, which then subdivides, producing +ve and -ve results, to start creating and filling the universe.  If the single value that we start with is odd, let's say 3, then the first subdivision, from one to three items, cannot result in a perfectly equal balance as there'll be one left over.  In this model, the actual observed baryon asymmetry is equivalent to a starting value of 1000000001 (decimal).

Then finally, there's the issue of needing all of the matter to come into contact with all of the antimatter, when the expansion of the universe means that everything is moving away from each other i.e. you could start with perfect balance but end up with the two members of a matched pair traveling in opposite directions, and so never meeting.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline Farsight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 396
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #8 on: 22/11/2009 13:28:53 »
Quote from: ...lets split up... on 20/11/2009 07:38:02
I am wondering why there is an excess of positive matter in the universe? I've thumb sucked my own unsupported ideas but I am interested in any other theories as to why this is. Much appreciated.
There isn't! Leaving out photons and neutrinos, all the stable matter of the universe consists of electrons and protons. There are of course neutrons too, but outside a nucleus they suffer beta-minus decay in about ten minutes and turn into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino. There's also positrons and antiprotons, but they soon encounter their antiparticle and annihilate, leaving our world full of electrons and protons. As far as we can tell, there's the same number of each.

You might say the protons are much heavier than the electrons, and in this respect there is more positively charged matter than negatively charged matter. But I suspect what you're really angling at is this:

"Electrons and protons are matter, whilst positrons and antiprotons are antimatter. Why is there an excess of matter in the universe?"

When you ask this question, you're missing a trick, and it's obvious when you think about it. Here's the $64,000 dollar question:

"Given a choice between the electron and the positron, which does the proton more closely resemble?"

The answer is the positron. And if the positron is antimatter, that means the proton is antimatter too, and that changes everything. Think of the early universe as a game of tennis, with matter fighting antimatter in an orgy of creation and destruction. People normally think of this as a game where the matter is on one side playing against the antimatter on the other side, like two men playing doubles against two women. It isn't like that. It was a game of mixed doubles. It was matter+antimatter v antimatter+matter. The quartet obviously isn't stable, but all you need is a chance excess of one over the other, and this excess will grow and grow via what's called a "stability tip".

This viewpoint puts the mockers on the much-touted "mystery of the missing antimatter". A proton is 1837 times as massive as the electron, so we're mostly made of the stuff. 
« Last Edit: 22/11/2009 16:28:02 by Farsight »
Logged
 



Offline PhysBang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 706
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #9 on: 22/11/2009 13:33:24 »
Amazingly, that makes less sense than your other posts. At least one word in that post must be wrong.
« Last Edit: 22/11/2009 13:34:56 by PhysBang »
Logged
Naked Scientists values: support moderators who try to demean posters by suggesting that they are Catholic, support moderators who ignore homophobic and transphobic threads, support moderators who promote climate change denial.
 

Offline Farsight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 396
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #10 on: 22/11/2009 15:11:47 »
As ever, PhysBang contributes nothing, and can only carp at those who do. He's a self-appointed member of the thought-police, he doesn't have any answers, and he attempts to stifle discussion and debate in case somebody else does. 
Logged
 

Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #11 on: 22/11/2009 16:21:25 »
Quote from: Farsight
And if the positron is antimatter, that means the positron is antimatter too,

I suspect you meant that the proton is antimatter too. You have seen my pet universe scheme, so you know I wouldn't suspect that is so.
Logged
 

Offline Farsight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 396
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #12 on: 22/11/2009 16:48:35 »
Duly corrected, Thanks Vern. I've seen your photon theory, is that what you meant? I envisage the proton as a trefoil photon, the "next knot" up from the electron, with charge being merely a matter of chirality. Whether something is classed as matter or antimatter is down to rarity rather than actual particle properties. And since we don't wonder where all the l-glucose is, I tend to see "the mystery of antimatter" as something that is over-promoted by institutions courting public funding, with media outlets being overly compliant. See http://www.newscientist.com/special/antimatter-mysteries as an example. Does antimatter fall up? Ye Gods.
« Last Edit: 22/11/2009 16:51:57 by Farsight »
Logged
 



Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #13 on: 23/11/2009 00:12:37 »
Quote from: Farsight on 22/11/2009 13:28:53
Quote from: ...lets split up... on 20/11/2009 07:38:02
I am wondering why there is an excess of positive matter in the universe? I've thumb sucked my own unsupported ideas but I am interested in any other theories as to why this is. Much appreciated.
There isn't! Leaving out photons and neutrinos, all the stable matter of the universe consists of electrons and protons. There are of course neutrons too, but outside a nucleus they suffer beta-minus decay in about ten minutes and turn into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino. There's also positrons and antiprotons, but they soon encounter their antiparticle and annihilate, leaving our world full of electrons and protons. As far as we can tell, there's the same number of each.

You might say the protons are much heavier than the electrons, and in this respect there is more positively charged matter than negatively charged matter. But I suspect what you're really angling at is this:

"Electrons and protons are matter, whilst positrons and antiprotons are antimatter. Why is there an excess of matter in the universe?"

When you ask this question, you're missing a trick, and it's obvious when you think about it. Here's the $64,000 dollar question:

"Given a choice between the electron and the positron, which does the proton more closely resemble?"

The answer is the positron. And if the positron is antimatter, that means the proton is antimatter too, and that changes everything. Think of the early universe as a game of tennis, with matter fighting antimatter in an orgy of creation and destruction. People normally think of this as a game where the matter is on one side playing against the antimatter on the other side, like two men playing doubles against two women. It isn't like that. It was a game of mixed doubles. It was matter+antimatter v antimatter+matter. The quartet obviously isn't stable, but all you need is a chance excess of one over the other, and this excess will grow and grow via what's called a "stability tip".

This viewpoint puts the mockers on the much-touted "mystery of the missing antimatter". A proton is 1837 times as massive as the electron, so we're mostly made of the stuff. 

Farsight, could you try and be a bit more... I don't know what the word is that i am looking for..

... serious - that's it, serious.
Logged

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶
 

Offline PhysBang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 706
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #14 on: 23/11/2009 00:49:39 »
Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 23/11/2009 00:12:37
Farsight, could you try and be a bit more... I don't know what the word is that i am looking for..

... serious - that's it, serious.
Seriously, one has to be insane to say that a proton is anything like a positron, so i don't know what you're hoping for here.
Logged
Naked Scientists values: support moderators who try to demean posters by suggesting that they are Catholic, support moderators who ignore homophobic and transphobic threads, support moderators who promote climate change denial.
 

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #15 on: 23/11/2009 06:58:14 »
Quote from: Farsight on 22/11/2009 13:28:53
...And if the positron is antimatter, that means the proton is antimatter too...

What utter nonsense.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline ...lets split up... (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 102
  • Activity:
    0%
  • I love lamp
    • View Profile
Why is there an excess of "positive" matter in the universe?
« Reply #16 on: 23/11/2009 14:29:51 »
Thanks for the replies. I also find it hard to believe a proton is anti-matter,
Quote from: Farsight on 22/11/2009 13:28:53
And if the positron is antimatter, that means the proton is antimatter too. 
just because A is like B, doesn't mean A has all the same qualities as B.

Personally i always felt there were two universes (or is it universii?), that look like two light cones joined at the same origin going in different directions. One anti-matter and one matter.

But admittedly i don't know the heavy science/ maths stuff, i work with what i got. And it might just be a compulsive obsessive thing to balance my ideas.
« Last Edit: 23/11/2009 14:49:13 by ...lets split up... »
Logged
I love lamp
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How do we know the Universe is expanding, and expanding into nothing?

Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 43
Views: 14619
Last post 22/07/2020 05:10:15
by CPT ArkAngel
If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?

Started by Tornado220Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 16
Views: 5763
Last post 06/07/2017 10:35:51
by paulggriffiths
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 11735
Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
by yor_on
If the universe contained only one object, could that object move?

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 51
Views: 35501
Last post 06/02/2009 02:18:40
by Vern
Was the 'shape' of the universe @T=0 the shape with the lowest entropy possible?

Started by peppercornBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 8
Views: 5306
Last post 10/03/2011 21:13:28
by peppercorn
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 78 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.