The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. Science Experiments
  4. Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science

  • 7 Replies
  • 22781 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science
« on: 20/03/2013 18:07:36 »
Does a glass get heavier if you put your finger in the water? Find out in this experiment.

Read more about this kitchen science experiment.

Listen to the Experiment [chapter podcast=2007 track=09.09.06/Naked_Scientists_Show_09.09.06_4554.mp3","]Part 1[/chapter] [chapter podcast=2007 track=09.09.06/Naked_Scientists_Show_09.09.06_4565.mp3","]Part 2[/chapter] [chapter podcast=2007 track=09.09.06/Naked_Scientists_Show_09.09.06_4554.mp3][/chapter]
...or download as MP3 [1] [2]
« Last Edit: 20/03/2013 18:07:36 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline daveshorts

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2568
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physics, Experiments
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science
« Reply #1 on: 11/12/2009 09:51:04 »
We received this question

Hi Chris,

I just listened to the podcast about how putting a finger in a cup of water causes the scale to register a higher value. I've got two questions on this:
- instead of using a finger, what about if you suspended an object from a scale into the water. Would the two scales cancel out, ie. would the suspended scale register less and the ground scale register exactly more?
- If the liquid is pushing against the liquid, then does the value of the register increase as the surface area of the object is increased?

 I didn't understand the explanation whereby increasing the water level increases the force. That would mean that two long skinny cup would weigh more than a short fat cup even though they have the same amount of water.

Really like your show!
      Barry
Logged
 

Offline daveshorts

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2568
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physics, Experiments
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science
« Reply #2 on: 11/12/2009 09:55:12 »
The force on the bottom of the cup is the pressure times the area of the bottom of the cup.

If you halve the area of the cup, you will also double its depth and therefore the water pressure at the bottom. So the overall foce stays the same.

However if you put your finger in the cup, you will increase the depth without changing the area so the overall force will increase.
Logged
 

Jerome

  • Guest
None
« Reply #3 on: 03/01/2010 04:22:29 »
Here was my reasoning, before seeing the results:

I will push down, or actually hold my finger up less, exactly the same amount as the buoyancy the water provides. Thus there will be the equivalent weight pushing down.

Here is how I would test this - set up the same experiment, but use an inanimate object *placed on the floor* (or other surface). It would have to be an inverted U of some kind, or held in a clamp for example. I suspect that as it will *not* compensate for the up thrust from the water, there will be no increased down thrust (weight).

The 'water is higher => more pressure => more weight' idea does not seem possible to me, or a taller container would have an effect, which obviously it would not (assuming an equal weight of the two containers).
Logged
 

Offline gem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 296
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science
« Reply #4 on: 04/02/2010 13:02:28 »
Galileo came up against these forces  when under house arrest on the instructions of the Vatican. [pressure due to gravity]
He was asked to advise as to why the form work for a bell casting had failed
.
It is a strange link between fluid pressure,force and gravity.
in the experiment where you put your finger in the liquid your finger actually weighs less by the same amount that the scales measuring the weight of the beaker increase. action/reaction

Another experient that you can do in your kitchen is get two seal-able lightweight plastic containers one slightly larger so the smaller one can fit inside the larger place the larger one on a set of scales and add a small amount of water in it then try putting the smaller container in and put on the lid.
 
You will notice the reading on the scales increase as you force the smaller container down in the water as also the level of the water rises in the large container due to displacement.
In fact the reading on the scale should exceed the total sum of the weight of the articles actually on the scales.

But when you place the seal-able lid on the larger container trapping in the smaller one and observe the reading on the scales you will find they only read the exact amount as the combined weight of the two containers and the water.

even though you had actually felt a greater force pushing up against you than the sum of the parts you also have to pair it with the increased reading on the scales.
It is a good example of newtons law, for every action there must be a equal and opposite reaction.
But that's not to say that just by putting on the lid these forces have disappeared,they are applying force to the containers at a pressure equal to the height of the fluid.

So height of the fluid metal in the bell casting was causing a pressure force greater than the weight of the metal, fortunately gallio was up to solving the dynamics of the forces involved and advised a revision of the design of the form work to counter these forces 

ding dong
Logged
 



Al

  • Guest
None
« Reply #5 on: 25/04/2010 04:19:20 »
You feel the upthrust because your finger is less dense than water. If your finger was made of iron, you would feel no upthrust. The extra weight shown on the scale is the weight of the water displaced by the part of the finger that is under water.q76pqv
Logged
 

Ian

  • Guest
None
« Reply #6 on: 15/11/2011 17:26:50 »
If your finger was made of iron, there would still be an upthrust.

The way I visualise displacement is to think of the volume of water that is being displaced being 'lifted' at the top of the container.  To lift the displaced fluid takes a force, and this is the bouyancy that is felt.  That is why the bouyancy of a non-floating object is related to the volume, not the mass or weight.
Logged
 

Offline rosekevin

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Weighing Buoyancy - Kitchen Science
« Reply #7 on: 28/03/2017 07:26:06 »
thanks for your information relating to the kithcen scale
« Last Edit: 28/03/2017 07:28:49 by rosekevin »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.