The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Radio Show & Podcast Feedback
  4. Crookes radiometer
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Crookes radiometer

  • 0 Replies
  • 5536 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BobSpence (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • http://www.uq.net.au/~zzbspenc/index.html
Crookes radiometer
« on: 12/10/2005 02:46:25 »
Here I go again, being 'picky'.[:)]

This instrument (the 4 black and silver vanes on a spindle in an evacuated glass vessel has been subject of some debate over the years,

Apparently, if the direct 'impact' of photons was what caused it to spin, the vanes would spin away from the shiny side, because there the photons are bouncing off and so experiencing a reversal of velocity which changes their momentum by up to twice their original amount, wheras on the dark side they get absorbed, and so simply impart all their momentum to the vane. This can be observed in highly evacuated containers and very low friction bearings, because the force is quite small.

It used to be thought that the usual motion in the opposite direction was due to the dark surface getting warmer and heating up the nearby gas molecules which hid the surface harder, but apparently its more subtle than that. Its apparently due to the thermal gradient around the edges of the vanes, and a bit more complicated to explain.

See this site:
newbielink:http://science.howstuffworks.com/question239.htm [nonactive]

Regards,
Bob S.
Logged
Regards,
Bob S.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 34 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.