[questioner]

Gravity acts on every atom. If an atom is moved away from the earth it exhibits less gravitational energy the further away it goes. Could the earth be sending a signal which induces the atom to produce a force directing it to the earth?  Could this signal be some form of radiation? Are there any experiments being done in space away from earths gravitational effects.

[jsaldea12 (OP)]

The conglomerate attraction gravity of earth extends to outer space, call it gravitational field. Which has electro-magnetic property that blends with the electro-magnetic  property of spacetime of Dr. Einstein. The message, the connection is at speed of light. Dr. Einstein revived aether into a new aether in 1920 speech which he elaborated  further with “gravitational and electro-magnetic property” That new aether is one and the same with spacetime.
.

Jsaldea12

2.22.10

[Bored chemist]

"Why is gravity all attraction toward earth?"
It isn't.
End of story.

[jsaldea12 (OP)]

Earth was formed ball-shaped, just like other suspended bodies in outer space, re- stars, galaxies, because tendency of suspended matters in outer space, due to such attraction gravity, is circular.  It is like a bar magnet, the strongest attraction is at both ends, while the middle of the magnet bar is the weakest or neutral magnetism,  but as earth is round all over, the longest straight line is from one surface straight to the center of earth, to the opposite straight surface, thus  all surface of earth has strongest, almost the same, attraction toward the interior center  of earth. Gravity can be approximated in a bar magnet. As stated, in the length of bar magnet, the strongest positive and negative magnetism are at both ends of the bar, while the nearest at the middle, magnetism is weakest or to a point it is nil, because positive property and negative property intersect one another at micro-micro distance, that both are almost one or is intersecting one.. Such, too,  is the approximation of the length, which is micro-length, thereby micro- strength of attraction gravity that a magnet lifting a nail is trillion times stronger. If gravity at surface of earth is this supra-weak, the gravity going down to center of earth is even weaker until at the center of earth there is no gravity…there is created  a condition like an outer space that even heavyweight  super-heated irons float, as heavier elements sunk deeper than lighter elements, toward the center of earth. Thus, as attraction gravity at surface of earth is  extremely supra-short-length,  such positive and negative property of earth becomes flexible, ambivalent, reversible, that it feasibly attracts, aligns and binds, overwhelmingly, the equally flexible supra-weak negative and positive property, respectively, (remember even inside the atom, the electrons and nucleus are in constant motion) of  all comparably miniscular  objects on surface of earth, including human and atmosphere and pull all toward the center of earth. In other words, there is ambivalent attraction, alignment, binding of positive and negative property of earth to the positive and negative property of all objects on surface, including atmosphere, of earth. This ambivalent behavior is the main reason why gravity is all attraction toward earth.  The earth, moon, atmosphere, man, as a matter of fact, all matter,  99.99%, more or less, of the universe are constructed of the same natural supra-weak gravity.  Supra-tiny humans cannot feel the force of supra-weak attraction gravity of earth but gargantuan bodies, like earth and the moon, suspended in outer space, physically feel the force of gravity as real as evidenced by the raising of million of tons of salty sea water (conductor of electricity) on earth whenever the moon is overhead. Reiterating, attraction gravity prevails over repulse property of the universe, otherwise no planets, stars, galaxies would have formed. The reason could be traced deep into the construction of proton.. Proton, in isolation, astonishingly does not decay, consists of UUD, two positive to one negative, thus, from the beginning, the Design was that the positive, binding and solidification of matter, shall prevail over negative.

 

jsaldea12

3.`18.10

[Bored chemist]

" It is like a bar magnet, the strongest attraction is at both ends, while the middle of the magnet bar is the weakest or neutral magnetism, "
Still plain wrong.

"Gravity can be approximated in a bar magnet"
Badly.


There really is a difference. Gravity always attracts.
And as usual you have not addressed the point I made.
Gravity is not always towards the Earth.

Are you trolling or just too dumb to learn?

[jsaldea12 (OP)]

Kindly answer these questions because these are relevant leading to why gravity is all attraction toward earth, so please answer:

1. Do you believe there such thing as positive and negative?

2. Do you believe that positive and negative are one, that it is the direction that tells
    whether it is positive and negative?


jsaldea123


3.19.10

[Bored chemist]

1 Yes, generally. But it has been shown on countless occasions that this is not the case for gravity.

2 Positive and negative are clearly different or we wouldn't need two words. The assignment of one thing as positive and the other negative can sometimes be arbitrary. This was the case very early on in electrostatics and the convention chosen back then is still with us. It's wrong in the sense that conventional current flows in the opposite direction to the electrons in a circuit.

In any event this has nothing to do with gravity which is always attractive.

Now it's your turn to answer.

Do you accept that if a man standing on the near side of the moon drops something it falls under gravity away from the earth and towards the moon?

[jsaldea12 (OP)]

A bar magnet has two sides, re-positive and negative. Cut the bar magnet into smaller sizes and note that on every cut bar, there is  positive and negative, proving that positive and negative are intrinsically one, that it is the direction that makes it positive and negative on opposite direction.

..it has bearing…note that the weakest attraction of magnet is at the middle of the bar magnet. Thus, the shorter the length of magnet, the weaker is its strength. Positive and negative is universal, it operates even in gravity. Gravity could be at the nearest, nearest dead middle of the bar magnet, because as computed, its strength is trillion times weaker than a magnet. Because the length of gravity, re-positive and negative, is almost intrinsically one, such positive and negative are almost even on surface of earth, gravity becomes ambivalent, flexible on surface of earth, it attracts, for instance, the more  flexible positive and negative of atmosphere to flexibly align with negative and positive property, respectively, of earth…that is why atmosphere is not flown to outer space. It is up to you but that is the way I see it.


Yes, it proves that the gravitational pull of the moon is stronger on the man who is on the moon, itself, than the gravitational pull of distant earth.
.

[BenV]

I've unlocked this so that the falsehoods stated by jsaldea12 can be corrected.  It's worth pointing out for anyone reading this thread that jsaldea12 ignores all comments from others and sticks with his fantasy version of physics.

[Bored chemist]

"A bar magnet has two sides, re-positive and negative. Cut the bar magnet into smaller sizes and note that on every cut bar, there is  positive and negative, proving that positive and negative are intrinsically one, that it is the direction that makes it positive and negative on opposite direction."
No, if I take the north pole of a magnet and hold it near the two poles of a second bar magnet I get different effects. In one case they attract, in the other case they repel.
If I turn the bar magnet round the same end still repels the north pole.
Direction has nothing to do with it.

"Thus, the shorter the length of magnet, the weaker is its strength. "
No, the Earth, for example, is very big but has a much weaker field than the magnet in the disk drive of this computer (which is, for the record, smaller than the Earth.)

"Positive and negative is universal, it operates even in gravity."
Simply wrong again.
No repulsive effect of gravity has ever been observed.

This "Because the length of gravity, re-positive and negative, is almost intrinsically one, such positive and negative are almost even on surface of earth, gravity becomes ambivalent, flexible on surface of earth, it attracts, for instance, the more  flexible positive and negative of atmosphere to flexibly align with negative and positive property, respectively, of earth…that is why atmosphere is not flown to outer space" is complete gibberish.
and so this "that is the way I see it." explains a lot.

And finally,
this "Yes, it proves that the gravitational pull of the moon is stronger on the man who is on the moon, itself, than the gravitational pull of distant earth."
is where JSaldea first realises that gravity isn't always attraction towards the Earth.

It seems to have taken a very long time for him to understand something that was pointed out on the 10th of Jan.
Perhaps this would be a good place to end this thread.