The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Have the star charts remained the same for 10,000 years?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Have the star charts remained the same for 10,000 years?

  • 2 Replies
  • 8683 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Camille Cazedessus

  • Guest
Have the star charts remained the same for 10,000 years?
« on: 15/01/2010 02:30:02 »
Camille Cazedessus asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Are the star charts nearly exactly the same now as they were 10,000 years ago. NOT where polar star is, but the CHART of Stars relative to each other, visually from here on Earth?  One new bright star was very dim  in ancient times...which one is it?

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 15/01/2010 02:30:02 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Have the star charts remained the same for 10,000 years?
« Reply #1 on: 15/01/2010 02:59:18 »
The position of stars does change ...

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnard%27s_star

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_motion

They can change in brightness too ...

Quote
In 185 CE, Chinese astronomers recorded the appearance of a bright star in the sky, and observed that it took about eight months to fade from the sky. It was observed to sparkle like a star and did not move across the heavens like a comet. These observations are consistent with the appearance of a supernova, and this is believed to be the oldest recorded by humankind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_supernova_observation#Early_history

* Barnard2005.gif (43.63 kB, 308x276 - viewed 1226 times.)
« Last Edit: 15/01/2010 17:20:17 by RD »
Logged
 

Marked as best answer by on 24/04/2024 14:05:03

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
Have the star charts remained the same for 10,000 years?
« Reply #2 on: 23/01/2010 17:35:07 »
I don't think there were any star charts 10000 years ago.

The Sumerians probably had star catalogues, written up in Cuneiform, around 3500-3000 BC, so they might have also had star charts around that time too.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.545 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.