The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. ?yahweh? & phonetic history
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

?yahweh? & phonetic history

  • 9 Replies
  • 9129 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CZARCAR (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« on: 18/01/2010 15:42:30 »
college freshman eng. teacher almost 40 yrs. ago said the latest,at that time, revised pronunciation of ancient script deemed that what was thought to be pronounced as yahweh was in fact pronounced "pipi"! this pronounciation was never promoted due to obvious factors. slow mental brewing thru the years makes me wonder if=
pipi, papa,pope,pastor,priest,please,potato...
mama,mammary, milk, milky way,amen, om,womb, MAN...
devil,demon,damn,dim,dope,dumb,dink,dizzy...
no & the "n" sound also carries a phonetic implication with some languages
have some phonetic relationships per the evolution of humans?
Logged
 



Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #1 on: 18/01/2010 19:25:05 »
So, what exactly is your "theory"?
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline CZARCAR (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #2 on: 19/01/2010 15:28:24 »
that when humans went from grunting into developing language the sounds of the words reflected the meaning. wish i knew more languages to compare.
m is soothing sound
p is abrupt sound
d is smooth & abrupt
Logged
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #3 on: 19/01/2010 17:15:14 »
Ah! OK - Thanks.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline CZARCAR (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #4 on: 24/01/2010 16:21:28 »
pipi,papa & how many religions refer to god as "father"?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #5 on: 24/01/2010 20:31:05 »
If we were able to establish that some word was once pronounced like some other word what, exactly, would we have achieved?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline CZARCAR (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #6 on: 25/01/2010 13:37:43 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/01/2010 20:31:05
If we were able to establish that some word was once pronounced like some other word what, exactly, would we have achieved?
that primal man was primitive & the idea of god as a father might have a more logical correlation to the word pipi than yaweh which i questioned after reading EXODUS 21/20 & 21/21 [KING JAMES BIBLE]
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #7 on: 25/01/2010 19:48:03 »
Just a thought; I suspect our ancestors had a name for "father"  before they had a name for "God" so, if one old word for God looks like lots of words for father it's no great shock.
It certainly tells us nothing about God and it tells us very little about language.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline CZARCAR (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #8 on: 25/01/2010 20:13:32 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/01/2010 19:48:03
Just a thought; I suspect our ancestors had a name for "father"  before they had a name for "God" so, if one old word for God looks like lots of words for father it's no great shock.
It certainly tells us nothing about God and it tells us very little about language.

the assertive negation of a proposition is much like the affirmation of a proposition,eh?= try to play the game...some & why bother cap the G?
Logged
 



Offline mirormimic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 52
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Phonetics= picture owing idios
?yahweh? & phonetic history
« Reply #9 on: 05/06/2010 19:32:16 »
As late as the 4th century C.C Jerome, the translator of the Latin Vulgate , says in his prologue to the books of Samuel and Kings: "And we find the name of God, the Tetragrammaton, in certain Greek volumes, even to this day expressed in ancient letters." In a letter written at Rome, 384 C.E, Jerome states: " The ninth [name of God] is the tetragrammaton, which they considered [anekphoneton], that is , unspeakable, and it is written with these letters, Iod, He, vau, He. Certain IGNORANT ones , because of the similarity of the characters, when they would find it in Greek books, were accustomed to read...[ Greek letters corresponding to the roman letters PIPI." Papyrus Grecs Bibliques, by F. Dunand, Cairo. 1966, p.47, ftn. 4.

Thus the origin of the Roman word: PIPI assimilated to "equate" to the pronunciation of the divine tetragrammaton...is erroneous. Tying these Roman characters to the Hebrew Characters for the divine name ( tetra-4; gramma-letters= YHWWH) represents unsubstantiated presumption on the part of the "ignorant ones".

However it is interesting that the word "anekphoneton"( refer to above usage) has within it the word "phoneto"...as in the word "PHONET(ics). Though asserting that PIPI is related to the Hebrew name for God is ludicrous....the relevance of Phonetics within language is superiorly relevant.
Logged
A picture is worth........!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.608 seconds with 50 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.