0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Find me a report of similar length and complexity with a similar number of contributors that does not contain a tpyo or misprunt...
In answer to the question - it is hard to say - the fallout from the CRU nonsense (AKA Climategate) appears to have simply reduced the number of fence sitters rather than persuaded anyone with a considered view (whether for or against AGW). I suspect this will have less effect.
Anyway, this is nothing compared to the global scientific conspiracy that ...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGIN have uncovered. Apparently alongside Hadley, NOAA and NCDC are manipulating data too. (I did think this accusation was from some onnion article or similar)
The prediction that the Himalayan glaciers could all melt by 2035 was made by a single Indian scientist (who has subsequently retracted the prediction), as an off-the-cuff remark in a 1999 telephone conversation with a journalist from New Scientist magazine. The prediction was never published in a formal scientific paper. The World Wildlife Fund subsequently quoted the prediction from the New Scientist article as fact in some of their propaganda and it appears that the IPCC picked the 'fact' up from the WWF publication.
Venus at 90% CO2 and with a mean surface Temperature of 477° C. The Greenhouse Effect is 523° C. Without Greenhouse effect -46° C.Surface pressure relative Earth is 90% (very near)
Well Peppercorn, we’ve all had a cold winter right, well most of us have. And for those countries not used to it, it’s a really bad surprise.....etc ....etc