can e=mc˛ be solved to give a value for t, time and d, space?

  • 8 Replies
  • 2943 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline yamo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 78
    • View Profile
can e=mc˛ be solved to give a value for t, time and d, space?  what are the values of time and space?







mod edit: Please make your topic titles a question. Because i'm simply gorgeous I have done it for you.
« Last Edit: 28/02/2010 19:24:46 by neilep »
Science is what you want it to be.
                   --Dr. Leo Spaceman--

*

Online Bored chemist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8862
    • View Profile
No.
Please disregard all previous signatures.

*

Offline flr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
    • View Profile
The relation e=mc2 is valid for any value of t and d.
In other words, it was valid yesterday and so it is today.
It is valid here in my place and everywhere in universe.
Or, if you wish, if I move an object with rest mass m from here to there,
the total energy stored in the rest mass will still be e=mc2.

*

Offline LeeE

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 3382
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Umm.. e=mc2 is not valid for any value of t & s (where s= displacement) because the result of s/t must always be <= 'c'

However, t & s are just different qualities of space-time, where t can be equated to s, so you essentially end up trying to deal with s/s.  The difference between s & t is really just down to our point of view.
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!

*

Offline JP

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 3366
    • View Profile
E=mc2 just tells you how to relate mass and energy for a stationary object (one that isn't moving) at a single point in space-time.  It's valid for any single point in space-time that you want to choose, as long as the object isn't moving, so that you can't tell the exact position and time just by looking at the equation.

By the way, the full equation is E2=m2c4+p2c2,
where p is momentum, which tells you about how the object is moving in space.  This is usually the one you want to use, since it's valid no matter how fast you or the object is moving.  If the object isn't moving, p=0 and this equation becomes E=mc2.

Edit: to fix a sign error.
« Last Edit: 01/03/2010 06:42:48 by JP »

*

Offline yamo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 78
    • View Profile
well c is a velocity delta d over delta t.  so what i am looking for is a definition for t or d in terms of e and m.  mebbe the limit as delta t(or d) approaches 0. 
Science is what you want it to be.
                   --Dr. Leo Spaceman--

*

Offline JP

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 3366
    • View Profile
If you care about velocity, which is delta d/delta t, then you can get it from the energy and momentum: v=pc2/E.  You can't get position of time themselves because the equations are valid at any space-time point you want to choose, so there's nothing to tell you which one you're using.

*

Offline Ron Hughes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 363
    • View Profile
Try working with this one,  M = hf/c^2
From a drop of water a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other. Sherlock Holmes.

*

Offline Farsight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 396
    • View Profile
Yamo: no, you can't "solve" this. That's because c is just a conversion factor between our measures of space and time. It's the speed of light, so it's a speed, which is distance over time, and both of these measures are defined using light.

JP: pair production and annihilation demonstrates a kind of "flip flop" between the p2c2 and the m2c4