The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could we measure parallax with greater accuracy with a station on Mars?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could we measure parallax with greater accuracy with a station on Mars?

  • 2 Replies
  • 5391 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

todd freed

  • Guest
Could we measure parallax with greater accuracy with a station on Mars?
« on: 05/03/2010 22:30:02 »
todd freed  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Hello Naked Scientists!

I have recently read a very interesting book about astronomy.

I have learned that one of the ways we measure the distance to distant stars is stellar parallax. With this method, you measure the stars position in the sky twice, 6 months apart. Then you create a triangle using the two orbital positions of the earth and the star, and work out the distance by solving the triangle. This apparently works for objects up to ~150 light years away.

My question is, would it be possible to establish an observation lab on Mars, or say one of the moons of Saturn, and use that station together with an observatory on Earth to get the same effect? If so, how much better would our measurements be?

Love the show,

Todd Freed
Idaho, USA

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 05/03/2010 22:30:02 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline GlentoranMark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 103
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Best Answer
  • Could we measure parallax with greater accuracy with a station on Mars?
    « Reply #1 on: 07/03/2010 11:42:47 »
    Yes most definitely. Parallax uses the diameter of the Earth's orbit which is roughly 300,000,000km. Mars or Saturn have a much larger orbit (Mars, is 450,000,000km and Saturn is 3,000,000,000km). Using a far bigger baseline will give a greater degree of accuracy.

    If the camera's on Voyager and Pioneer were any good, we could use these to measure parallax but I think that the Hipparcus Satellite that measured stellar Parrallax in  the 80's and 90's gave a far greater degree of accuracy than anything that was available in the 70's.
    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31103
    • Activity:
      9.5%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Could we measure parallax with greater accuracy with a station on Mars?
    « Reply #2 on: 07/03/2010 17:18:41 »
    You can only measure parallax to the resolution of the telescope you are using.I don't know the figures but it might be that the size of a 'scope we could get to Mars would be too small to take advantage of the larger baseline for measuring parallax.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.351 seconds with 29 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.