The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. 1 = -1?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

1 = -1?

  • 37 Replies
  • 22354 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« on: 15/05/2010 11:40:34 »
Some thing wrong right here ....  [???]

1= -(-1)
1= -[(-1)²]½
1= -(1)½
1=-√1
1=-1


« Last Edit: 15/05/2010 20:39:13 by myriam »
Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 



Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
1 = -1?
« Reply #1 on: 15/05/2010 13:20:34 »
Quote from: myriam on 15/05/2010 11:40:34
Some thing wrong right here ....  [???]

1= -(-1)
1= -[(-1)²]½

Since [(-1)²]½=(1)½=1, line 2 doesn't follow from line 1.
Logged
 

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #2 on: 15/05/2010 13:45:22 »
Quote from: JP on 15/05/2010 13:20:34
Quote from: myriam on 15/05/2010 11:40:34
Some thing wrong right here ....  [???]

1= -(-1)
1= -[(-1)²]½

Since [(-1)²]½=(1)½=1, line 2 doesn't follow from line 1.

good try JP but no , this isn't the right answer

Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 

Offline imatfaal

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2782
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • rouge moderator
1 = -1?
« Reply #3 on: 15/05/2010 16:06:46 »
finding a root gives two possibilities +/-1; and in situations like this when the square root is extracted, it is the negative root −1, not the positive root, (which is absurd for this equation).  which leaves the next line of your equation as 1=-(-1).
Logged
There’s no sense in being precise when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.  John Von Neumann

At the surface, we may appear as intellects, helpful people, friendly staff or protectors of the interwebs. Deep down inside, we're all trolls. CaptainPanic @ sf.n
 

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #4 on: 17/05/2010 00:38:59 »
sorry imatfaal
The answer is more simple than you think
Give it an other try



 
Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 



Offline imatfaal

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2782
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • rouge moderator
1 = -1?
« Reply #5 on: 17/05/2010 12:19:16 »
as JP and I have both given valid answers from different perspectives - your correct answer better be a good one :-)
Logged
There’s no sense in being precise when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.  John Von Neumann

At the surface, we may appear as intellects, helpful people, friendly staff or protectors of the interwebs. Deep down inside, we're all trolls. CaptainPanic @ sf.n
 

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #6 on: 17/05/2010 12:31:22 »
:)

well , lets give a chance to some other people to try also
till this Friday I'll see how much easy  or difficult maths are    :)
Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 

Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
1 = -1?
« Reply #7 on: 17/05/2010 13:53:06 »
I rather think imatfaal had it. Maybe it could be expressed more simply but you could show the faulty reasoning as follows:


let a=b=1
a=b
a²=b²
a²-b²=0
(a-b)(a+b)=0

so, as a≠0, b≠0
a+b=0 iff a-b≠0, which is false
a-b=0 iff a+b≠0, which is true

so a-b=0
a=b
so a=1 and b=1


Taking the square root give two answers (±1) and one is false because you are creating a quadratic equation then factorising to get the roots. The factorisation that gives you the false answer involves dividing by zero.
Logged
 

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #8 on: 17/05/2010 16:45:57 »
you showed that 1≠-1 which is true ,so you can do something easier,
you could show the faculty finding the error in my equations

try again graham.d :)
Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 



Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
1 = -1?
« Reply #9 on: 17/05/2010 17:22:01 »
The square root of 1 does not have one answer. It can be +1 or -1. You chose it (incorrectly) to be +1. I thought I showed, reasonable rigorously, why this choice was erronious because your solving of the quadratic equation involved a division by zero. Is there a fault in the proof? I give up.

This is why I'm a physicist and engineer and not a mathematician :-)
Logged
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
1 = -1?
« Reply #10 on: 17/05/2010 19:17:03 »
Quote from: myriam on 15/05/2010 11:40:34
1= -(-1)
1= -[(-1)²]½
1= -(1)½
1=-√1
1=-1[/b]


Line 2 is invalid. The power 1/2 has to be inside the square bracket which makes the square brackets redundant and the power 2/2 which is of course, 1.
« Last Edit: 17/05/2010 19:40:32 by Geezer »
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #11 on: 17/05/2010 20:22:55 »
for all real numbers
√x² =|x|
    = x if x≥0
    =-x if x≤0


I don't see the error in the line 4  ,  √1 = 1 since  1>0 already

But the really error is no there :)

Geezer it is great you found the faulty line but the reasoning is not this,
find the theorem that demonstrates the error in line 2

just to tell you there are other faulty proof for 1=-1 like for example

-1=i.i=√-1 .√-1 =√(-1.-1) = √1 = 1  but where is the fault ???
this is an other challenge

I'm not telling the answer rapidly [;D]  ,  think about it   



Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
1 = -1?
« Reply #12 on: 17/05/2010 20:46:32 »
Quote from: myriam on 15/05/2010 11:40:34
1= -(-1)
1= -[(-1)²]½

1 = -(-1)
  = -[-(1²)½]
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #13 on: 17/05/2010 20:53:57 »
ok, where is the theorem telling that i can't  write  1= -[(-1)²]½  ??
Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
1 = -1?
« Reply #14 on: 17/05/2010 21:22:45 »
Quote from: myriam on 17/05/2010 20:53:57
ok, where is the theorem telling that i can't  write  1= -[(-1)²]½  ??


No theoerm required. You are substituting something that is not equal to -1. Show me how you get from my line 2 to your line 2.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #15 on: 17/05/2010 21:30:51 »
Quote from: Geezer on 17/05/2010 21:22:45
Quote from: myriam on 17/05/2010 20:53:57
ok, where is the theorem telling that i can't  write  1= -[(-1)²]½  ??


No theoerm required. You are substituting something that is not equal to -1. Show me how you get from my line 2 to your line 2.
oh yes there is a very important theoerme there
Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
1 = -1?
« Reply #16 on: 17/05/2010 21:40:53 »
Well, I suppose if you want to try to take the square root of a negative number, that's up to you.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline myriam (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 163
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Many things are still like the Terre incognita
    • powerful point
1 = -1?
« Reply #17 on: 17/05/2010 21:53:07 »
 [;D]

but do you know that  if x is any positive number, then the principal square root of −x is √-x =i.√x

The theorem is ..uhm ... not now, maybe someone is about to find it , lets wait   [;D]


Logged
live with faith, love and ambition
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
1 = -1?
« Reply #18 on: 18/05/2010 06:14:05 »
Yes, but it was j in my day.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
1 = -1?
« Reply #19 on: 18/05/2010 06:33:24 »
... then you all realized how silly it was to talk about jmaginary numbers.   [;D]
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 2.245 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.