The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Is teleportation possible?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is teleportation possible?

  • 1 Replies
  • 4227 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ramana

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
Is teleportation possible?
« on: 20/05/2010 21:30:04 »
Ramana asked the Naked Scientists:
   
If everything is made of protons, electrons, neutrons.... is teleportation a possibility by dismantling and re-constructing a physical object? In other words, why can't we travel faster than light?

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 20/05/2010 21:30:04 by _system »
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on Today at 17:53:09

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Is teleportation possible?
    « Reply #1 on: 21/05/2010 02:35:43 »
    Hi Ramana,

    The problem with teleportation faster than the speed of light can be illustrated with a simple question: how would you give someone instructions to reconstruct the object on the other side?  You have to send them the blueprints somehow, which is going to be limited by the speed of light.

    Teleportation itself (moving an object by dismantling it and reconstructing it at another point) has two problems:
    1) Physically, because of something in quantum mechanics called the uncertainty principle, you can't know  all the information about the particles exactly, so exactly reconstructing it would be a problem.
    2) Storing the blueprint of all the particles in an object is going to take a huge amount of data--probably more than any computer in existence.  Then you have to send that data to someone, they have to read it, and then they have to reconstruct the object.  Given the requirements on data storage and transfer, even if this is possible, it's a long way off.
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 1.276 seconds with 29 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.