Hello

  • 4 Replies
  • 3996 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline upton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 84
    • View Profile
Hello
« on: 19/01/2006 15:57:06 »
Hello

I can't think of a signature.
~~~I can't think of a signature~~~

*

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12656
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: Hello
« Reply #1 on: 19/01/2006 18:21:45 »
Hello Upton. I hope you enjoy your visits to this site.
Fledgling science site at http://www.sciencefile.org/SF/content/view/54/98/ needs members and original articles. If you can help, please join.

*

Offline upton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 84
    • View Profile
Re: Hello
« Reply #2 on: 19/01/2006 18:51:50 »
I hope so too. thank you for the welcome DoctorBeaver.

I can't think of a signature.
~~~I can't think of a signature~~~

*

Offline Andrew K Fletcher

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2331
  • KIS Keep It Simple
    • View Profile
Re: Hello
« Reply #3 on: 19/01/2006 19:15:22 »
Got a signature for you      Upton O Good

Hello Upton

"The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct."
K.I.S. "Keep it simple!"
Science is continually evolving. Nothing is set in stone. Question everything and everyone. Always consider vested interests as a reason for miss-direction. But most of all explore and find answers that you are comfortable with

*

Offline upton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 84
    • View Profile
Re: Hello
« Reply #4 on: 19/01/2006 19:20:47 »
quote:
Originally posted by Andrew K Fletcher

Got a signature for you      Upton O Good

Hello Upton

"The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct."
K.I.S. "Keep it simple!"




[:)] ha ha ! I should use that as a signature shouldn't I ?

But I'm a good boy really. [:)]

I hope this quoting thing works.




I can't think of a signature.
~~~I can't think of a signature~~~