0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Land masses are attached to plates, and the plates absolutely move. So the land masses don't move independently of the plates. An excellent example of this is the Indian plate running into the Asian plate to form the Himalaya Mountains.The oceanic plates dive underneath the continental plates at subduction zones due to their relatively higher density and because they are far thinner than the lighter continental material.
That's the Matterhorn.
That's the Matterhorn. Don't know what the significance of the picture was but I am pretty sure it isn't Himalayan
Yellowstone is moving to the northeast.
Quote from: Bass on 06/11/2010 00:20:31Yellowstone is moving to the northeast.Can you do anything to make it move a bit faster, please?
Quote from: Geezer on 06/11/2010 02:14:19Quote from: Bass on 06/11/2010 00:20:31Yellowstone is moving to the northeast.Can you do anything to make it move a bit faster, please?What do you have against Billings?
Quote from: Bass on 06/11/2010 03:10:57Quote from: Geezer on 06/11/2010 02:14:19Quote from: Bass on 06/11/2010 00:20:31Yellowstone is moving to the northeast.Can you do anything to make it move a bit faster, please?What do you have against Billings?Nothing - I just don't want to get turned into a crispy critter.
, i can understand convection in the mantle, but if one plate moves doesnt all the rest have to budge out the way? and in the same direction as the first plate
so does that mean that there are plates getting smaller, wile others are expanding?