The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Buritto battery could it work better?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Buritto battery could it work better?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3172 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jolly- Joliver (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 584
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Buritto battery could it work better?
« on: 26/03/2011 22:46:51 »
Continuing a discussion on the burrito battery....

Quote
Geezer...
I'm sure there are lots of ways it might be improved, but it's still simply a chemical battery. Once the aluminium is oxidized, the battery stops producting electrical energy.

Despite the fact that this battery uses water as an electrolyte (just like a lot of other batteries).

OK what if you rotated? What I mean is, what if you developed a system, say ten carbon electrodes, one is in the battery oxidising, when finished, it leaves the battery a new one enters, the last one in gets cleaned, then has new aluminum attached to it? It then rotates around and around with a consistent source of newly made electrodes.

As an example you have an aluminum dust compartment with aluminum filings the newly cleaned rod rolls in that collects new aluminium for oxidisation? so the process goes around continually til all the aluminium filings are gone.

Would that be better?
« Last Edit: 26/03/2011 22:57:09 by Wiybit »
Logged
What am I doing thinking about science?

http://www.youtube.com/user/Wiybit

Where do you go? Yours with love JOLLY
 



Offline Jolly- Joliver (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 584
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Buritto battery could it work better?
« Reply #1 on: 26/03/2011 22:52:46 »
As another idea, what if you used a magnetic system a metal rod eletrode with a metal ball at the end? Could you not use magnetics at the same time to hold aluminium particles to the ball and also run a current through to oxidise them?

Which again would rotate with a series of other electrodes and once a electrode was used up it left the battery another electrod entered. The electrode that leaves then remagnetises some more Aluminium particles.

Would that work?
Logged
What am I doing thinking about science?

http://www.youtube.com/user/Wiybit

Where do you go? Yours with love JOLLY
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.158 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.