The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. UFO?.......is a boy...
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

UFO?.......is a boy...

  • 21 Replies
  • 24846 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GlacierBlue

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 13
  • Activity:
    0%
    • http://www20.brinkster.com/katielexi
Re: UFO?.......is a boy...
« Reply #20 on: 12/12/2003 22:53:44 »
It’s not only the environmentalists that wouldn't allow it. What would happen if a "dirty" satellite crashed into your backyard? Imagine what would happen if for some reason it was still actively producing power when it crashed? I think that it’s a pretty good idea to keep nuclear reactors out of space unless there is no chance they could ever fall back to earth.




If the multi-verse is a real construct then in some universe Im your God.
Logged
If the multi-verse is a real construct then in some universe Im your God.
 



Offline tweener

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1144
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: UFO?.......is a boy...
« Reply #21 on: 14/12/2003 00:45:22 »
Actually, the biggest risk is on launch, and it is technically feasible to build a reactor such that reentry and a crash will not rupture the containment.  Once it is out in space, it is possible to guide the satellite to a good landing spot in most cases.  If not, the crash still won't rupture the containment vessel of the reactor.

No, I don't want it crashing in my back yard, but in some cases the risk is worth the return.


----
John
Logged
----
John - The Eternal Pessimist.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.682 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.