The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation

  • 3 Replies
  • 3782 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nismo1 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation
« on: 21/09/2011 10:56:15 »

I watched a doco last night about evolution called Mutant Planet Africa.  It focused onThe Grift Rift Vally where it was highlighted that the cichlids fish split into 500 species in a relatively short period (12,500 year old lake). 

They described how this speedy evolution may have occurred. e.g  where some female fish may have preferred a male fish that built sloping mounds on the lake floor and avoided other males that built flat mounds.  The female then breeds with the sloping mounded males.  In turn, the female's offspring is most likely to prefer sloping mounded males, and may never breed with the flat mounded males.  The narrator explains that this situation can start a new cichlids species.

Now to my question.  It seems to me that although the female fish has preference for sloping mounds, I don't see how that can lead to speciation.  My logic is that even though she chooses/prefers sloping mounded males, she is still biologically able to breed with the flat mounded males and have offspring.  When does this "choice" cross the line into creating a new species that is not able to breed with the old species?

Sorry for the rambling, and if i'm not making any sense! Thanks,
Logged
 



Offline viola123

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation
« Reply #1 on: 28/09/2011 06:12:00 »
Good one dude..keep doing nice work  newbielink:http://www.thenakedscientists.com [nonactive]

Spam you very much.
« Last Edit: 28/09/2011 07:45:58 by Geezer »
Logged
 

Offline Nizzle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 963
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Extropian by choice!
    • View Profile
    • Carnivorous Plants
When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation
« Reply #2 on: 28/09/2011 13:24:43 »
Quote from: nismo1 on 21/09/2011 10:56:15
When does this "choice" cross the line into creating a new species that is not able to breed with the old species?

Hmm, interesting question there.
Here's what I think: In order to drive this speciation, there must be an advantage to this female's choice. One that comes to mind is that flat mound and sloping mound building fish (and the females that choose their corresponding 'best match') also show different behavior that is specifically useful for constructing or defending their mounds.
Therefore, in the beginning of differentiation, when there's not yet a speciation, mixed couples will produce mixed offspring, but since they don't have a mixed mound, only the offspring that inherits the correct behaviour according to the mound they're used to will survive in the long run.
This creates an ever bigger split between flat mounding cichlids and sloped mounding cichlids, which leads to an ever bigger genetic difference up until the point where the mixed couples are unable to breed at all and speciation will occur.

EDIT: The fact that this evolution occurs so fast is because fish generally tend to have large numbers of offspring, which implies bigger competition for space amongst siblings, which in turn stresses the importance of 'inheriting the right behaviour'
« Last Edit: 28/09/2011 13:27:26 by Nizzle »
Logged
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Most poems rhyme,
but this one doesn't
 

Offline nismo1 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation
« Reply #3 on: 29/09/2011 15:07:26 »
Thanks Nizzle for your insightful response. Nature and evolution fascinates me to no end :-)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

HOW DOES AN UP QUARK TURN INTO A DOWN QUARK?

Started by Ron HughesBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 10344
Last post 15/09/2010 04:01:32
by JP
Why does egg white turn from translucent to white when whipped?

Started by chrisBoard Chemistry

Replies: 4
Views: 1165
Last post 02/11/2019 23:04:10
by chris
Can you turn electric energy into solar energy?

Started by EvaHBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 15
Views: 867
Last post 31/07/2020 15:32:51
by yor_on
Can DNA evolution switches in transparent animals change electron energy levels?

Started by Nicholas LeeBoard Chemistry

Replies: 1
Views: 2397
Last post 09/07/2016 12:37:49
by puppypower
The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity

Started by paul.frBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 33
Views: 18604
Last post 20/02/2009 01:47:43
by _Stefan_
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.12 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.