The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. What made the Montreal Protocol so successful?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What made the Montreal Protocol so successful?

  • 3 Replies
  • 6219 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
What made the Montreal Protocol so successful?
« on: 13/12/2011 18:04:50 »
Richard Hollingham investigates why ozone depletion sparked unanimous change around the World in 1987 and whether a similar feat could be achieved to fight Climate Change...
Read a transcript of the interview by clicking here

or  
« Last Edit: 13/12/2011 18:04:50 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline grizelda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 740
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: What made the Montreal Protocol so successful?
« Reply #1 on: 19/12/2011 22:28:00 »
If the government solution to CFC's had been to tax them instead of a ban we would probably be using twice as much by now. Probably greenpeace is being paid by the oil industry to promote hysteria against nuclear power so there is no alternative to oil.
Logged
 

Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Re: What made the Montreal Protocol so successful?
« Reply #2 on: 20/12/2011 17:45:27 »
Quote from: grizelda on 19/12/2011 22:28:00
If the government solution to CFC's had been to tax them instead of a ban we would probably be using twice as much by now. Probably greenpeace is being paid by the oil industry to promote hysteria against nuclear power so there is no alternative to oil.
And I thought I was cynical!

Surely it was only so easy to ban CFCs as there was a ready alternative; at only fractionally higher cost.  Also, then, the weight of vested interests opposing change was almost nil - instead now we have pretty much every economy in the entire world.

Plus more or less everyone can visualise the risk of dying of cancer caused by UV radiation.
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Re: What made the Montreal Protocol so successful?
« Reply #3 on: 20/12/2011 18:55:29 »
Quote from: peppercorn on 20/12/2011 17:45:27

Plus more or less everyone can visualize the risk of dying of cancer caused by UV radiation.


Shsssss! The Greek economy is in bad enough shape as it is.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.52 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.