0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Thanks for your answer Wolfekeeper.But that is what I said above, that isn't a problem but we automatically assume that less dense things will rise but we have no real reason behind it, we just assume it to be there.

Hot gas rise on earth or a planet that has gravity but not if we are in 0 gravity, because there is no rise. In 0 gravity less dense object mix with higher density objects without any problem, air bubble that is heated and has less density mixes perfectly fine with air around it and it doesn't go up or down.<link snipped>

That means gravity plays part in things rising, that would mean that anything with higher energy level rises because it doesn't have the same attraction toward the object.

As I said in my anomaly example, gravity formula could be in such a wayg=m1+e1+m2-e2

Remember that m1 and e1 are for larger object, while m2 and e2 are for smaller object (as I'm not a mathematician I really have to work hard on making a formula that works for both). I'm not saying it would make a lots of difference but there is a visible effect of this problem, in gravity anomaly that we get from GRACE and in the density problem.My prediction is in 0G energy would have a repelling property, because if you make m1 and e1 as 0 that is what you get.

I really hope to get more responses on it, I really want people to help me with this by giving me example and proving me wrong so in case I'm wrong I would know. Thanks

But that is what I said above, that isn't a problem but we automatically assume that less dense things will rise but we have no real reason behind it, we just assume it to be there.

A volume of hot gas will mix as well as lift even in a gravitational field

Dimensional Analysis would be good herems^-2 DoesNotEqual kg + joules

When you heat up a (we'll assume for the moment for clarity that it's a sealed-type) hot air balloon, it gets physically bigger, but weighs the same.

Not sure what I can say apart from the fact that your ideas that energy is repulsive and matter attractive are completely contradicted by our best model of gravity ie General Relativity.

Okay after doing some searching on the internet, its clear that higher energy objects are lighter than lower energy objects.

Thus gravity doesn't make sense as attraction between two masses but mass and energy.

In case the energy is increased equilibrium forces the atom away so that lesser energy atom could take the same space and increase the amount of energy.Thus my assumption of energy and matter being source of attraction is right.

ClipQuote from: imatfaal on 06/03/2012 11:06:25 Not sure what I can say apart from the fact that your ideas that energy is repulsive and matter attractive are completely contradicted by our best model of gravity ie General Relativity.Energy is subject to entropy and one way of accomplishing that is by dispersal.Matter is subject to gravity and also subject to entropy but accomplishes this in the opposite way by matter combining.It is true that according to GR energy has gravity but I believe its dispersal tenancies far outweigh any gravitational attraction that it may possess. A hot air balloon is an example of this.

Quote from: MikeS on 07/03/2012 09:26:22ClipQuote from: imatfaal on 06/03/2012 11:06:25 Not sure what I can say apart from the fact that your ideas that energy is repulsive and matter attractive are completely contradicted by our best model of gravity ie General Relativity.Energy is subject to entropy and one way of accomplishing that is by dispersal.Matter is subject to gravity and also subject to entropy but accomplishes this in the opposite way by matter combining.It is true that according to GR energy has gravity but I believe its dispersal tenancies far outweigh any gravitational attraction that it may possess. A hot air balloon is an example of this. This is just wrong. a hot air balloon works because hot air rises; ie because the volume of gases interior to the balloon have a smaller mass than a similar volume of normal atmosphere

Sorry MikeS,I put your name there by mistake actually.Sorry about that.