The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. Science Experiments
  4. Can someone explain the law behind the can crushing experiment?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can someone explain the law behind the can crushing experiment?

  • 1 Replies
  • 13584 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline blenhart (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
Can someone explain the law behind the can crushing experiment?
« on: 03/04/2012 23:39:56 »
im doing a project for my chemistry class, and i am doing it on how atmospheric pressure can be used to crush a can with boiling water inside of it. im not sure what law explains this phenomenon though. is it the ideal gas law? combined gas law? help would be greatly appreciated pleaseeeeeee  :)
Logged
 



Offline damocles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 756
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Can someone explain the law behind the can crushing experiment?
« Reply #1 on: 05/04/2012 08:29:50 »
Probably the best approach to an explanation of this demonstration is in terms of equilibrium vapour pressure. If you have liquid water, there is always a little bit of gas phase water (water vapour) in equilibrium with it. At the freezing point the amount of water vapour corresponds to a pressure of about 0.5% of atmospheric. It mixes in with the rest of the atmosphere. But the equilibrium vapour pressure increases rapidly with increasing temperature, so that at laboratory temperatures it is around 3% of atmospheric.

The boiling point of water is the temperature at which the equilibrium vapour pressure becomes equal to atmospheric pressure. So if you vigourously boil water in a vessel with a small opening, the vapour will come off at atmospheric pressure, and drive the other air out of the vessel before it mixes much. When the vessel is sealed and allowed to cool, there is almost no air inside, and the water vapour inside condenses back to liquid water, and drops its pressure as it does so.

When the vessel has returned to room temperature, you have a pressure of 100 kilopascal from the air on the outside of the vessel, but only a pressure of about 3 kilopascal trying to balance it from the inside. Many vessels will collapse under this sort of pressure difference.

Atmospheric pressure of about 100 kilopascal is equal in more familiar units to about 1 kg. wt. per sq. cm., or about 14.5 lb. wt. per sq. in. for those who still use imperial units.

The gas laws only enter into this sort of explanation in the most indirect way. But the demonstration is often used to illustrate just what a large pressure the atmosphere really exerts.
Logged
1 4 6 4 1
4 4 9 4 4     
a perfect perfect square square
6 9 6 9 6
4 4 9 4 4
1 4 6 4 1
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.297 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.