The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does the universe have a definite mass?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does the universe have a definite mass?

  • 3 Replies
  • 3886 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ARVIND (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
Does the universe have a definite mass?
« on: 09/01/2013 14:26:53 »
        According to the laws of conservation of mass, mass can neither be created nor be destroyed. But, according to Einstein`s famous formula E=mc2 , mass can be converted to energy. So, does this this mean that the quantity of mass and energy in the whole universe is in inverse proportion. 
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11034
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Does the universe have a definite mass?
« Reply #1 on: 09/01/2013 19:57:33 »
For experiments that we can conduct in the laboratory today, an inverse relation is found to exist between energy and mass.

This belief is so strong that when some experiments found that mass/energy/momentum was "missing", it led to the successful modelling of the neutrino, an elusive particle which is very hard to detect.
Scientists working on the Large Hadron Collider are continuing to look for missing mass/energy, as it could again indicate the existence of even more subtle particles - perhaps those comprising the mysterious "Dark Matter".

The Big Bang theory suggests that the universe was initially very hot and dense, and then some of this energy turned into the matter we see today. It is thought that the visible matter we see consists of about 1080 protons+neutrons (plus a similar number of electrons as the protons). It is thought that a larger fraction of this initial energy turned into Dark Matter - but we don't really know what this is, yet.

An even larger amount of energy is thought to reside in Dark Energy, driving the expansion of the universe. It's a bit early to say whether this can be converted into mass and back again, or whether it will just decay as the universe expands.

The amount of mass in the universe is not expected to remain constant over time. Some theories suggest that over extremely long periods of time, matter will again decay into energy, but its density will be so low that it won't form new matter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe#Dark_Era_and_Photon_Age
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81572
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: Does the universe have a definite mass?
« Reply #2 on: 22/01/2013 18:17:51 »
Don't know. Do the universe exist as a 'whole unified global description', or is it all local descriptions creating the global description to us? Does a black hole exist in 'our universe', or not? Does quantum mechanical fluctuations of energy have a finite amount, as in 'zero point energy', or can one assume that there are no limits?
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Ethos_

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1332
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
Re: Does the universe have a definite mass?
« Reply #3 on: 29/01/2013 21:02:27 »
Quote from: yor_on on 22/01/2013 18:17:51
Don't know. Do the universe exist as a 'whole unified global description', or is it all local descriptions creating the global description to us? Does a black hole exist in 'our universe', or not? Does quantum mechanical fluctuations of energy have a finite amount, as in 'zero point energy', or can one assume that there are no limits?
As Yor_on has suggested, while this question is an interesting one, it's answer will not be easily defined. It's very possible that black holes are exit ways for matter and energy from our universe to another. Given the recent theory about brane collisions also causing the Big Bang and what-not, the variables contained within this question are staggering.

As a side to this question, something tells me that the precise volume of our space/time capsule has a definite relationship to this answer.
Logged
"The more things change, the more they remain the same."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.364 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.