[Pincho (OP)]

So, did anyone put a concave hexagon grid over the NASA picture of Dark Matter?

This is what you would see...

Too good to be true?

Probably yes. I don't expect the fractal to be quite that obvious. There was another picture posted a few years later, and NASA said that the new picture definitely did not contain a fractal unlike the first. But when I inspected the new picture it had the same fractal, but you had to apply a bit more of a concave curve to the grid.

Here is a link, read it for yourself.. it has the same fractal...
http://www.space.com/17234-universe-fractal-large-scale-theory.html

[Pincho (OP)]

So, according to the evidence so far, a quantum set of 12 particles around 1 particle, maintains its shape all the way up to infinity. The particle stacking system uses Newton's Kissing problem, which averages out to a hexagon shape from any direction in 3D.

The structure of spacetime then looks a bit like this...

And Spin Spin is that shape rotating.

[Pincho (OP)]

And when the particles touch the energy is passed along like a circuit board. And the message can be a photon. The fractal can be determined how each set of physics works. I said that a photon is a message passed by a sort of curved waterfall. An outward curve holds together until it is touched, and then it releases energy like a spray outwards. An inward curve blasts energy inwards. The fractal can be seen in some space anomalies...

(I edited this image to make the bubbles clearer to the human eye.)

[Pincho (OP)]

So if that's the in flow what does the out flow look like...

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23248-giant-milky-way-bubbles-blown-by-black-hole-merger.html

The galaxy could be the out flow from the touching forces. It's something I am testing out at the moment, as seen in this test.... zoom in to the middle...

[Pincho (OP)]

Here's a question? If the Universe is a fractal, what is the difference between Dark Matter, and Grey Matter?

Well if you look at the picture I posted earlier of Dark Energy placement in the Universe, and now look this article. there is not much difference...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130307124754.htm


... and in my mind there is a planet called Earth

... and on this Earth I sit

... and I sit and I think of Dark Energy

... and in this Dark Energy there is a planet called Earth

... and on that Earth I sit, and think

... and in my mind there is a planet called Earth

Just a poetic interlude. 

[Pincho (OP)]

What is the constant C?

When you use a Newtons Cradle the balls have a similar size, and a set radius, and all propagate through a force, and the energy escapes. The speed drops because the energy escapes. That would be the Convex waterfall effect escaping.

The physics of C are similar to a Newton's Cradle, but the energy doesn't escape. A set distance is propagated through. Time acts as a piston in the middle. The piston value...

5,4,3,2,1,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5 adds up to zero. So zero is lost.

So in a normal Newtons Cradle energy is lost in the X/Y/Z

Inverted physics forces the energy into a hole, and back into the system again. The hole is where X / Y /Z all meet up at a single point... Time.

Time which has a bounce with no loss of speed. The propagator of all things.

[Pincho (OP)]

Relativity stored in a fractal framework.

You stand on a train.

The train has a bow shock which is the scaling of space time.

Newton's Kissing problem is 12 balls around 1 ball.

The train scales down the centre ball of 12 to make points in space time, because the middle ball has nowhere to escape to.

The other scalar particles can escape if they are fast enough relative to the train speed. Otherwise bunching occurs.

Bunching traps more scalar particles, they cannot escape.

There are more points created by bunching, more scaling down, less resistance from forward motion due to a fragmented space time. Bunching is due to acceleration, once the speed becomes regular the bunching rolls through its own newly created holes in the bow shock areas.

Time as a geyser spring is under pressure. Time dilation occurs due to the restriction of forward flow from a hole. The loss of forward flow also takes pressure off the atoms. Contraction throughout the train is due to loss of internal time pressure. Time shrinks, time is a propagator of atoms.

The electrons as holes have a flow of incoming gravity from the train movement. This spins around the electrons, and expands the holes. Magnetism flows forwards as a push force. G force flows backwards as a push force. Magnetism is another aspect of the scaling of space time down.

Colour shifts are related to scale shifts. A wave is a scalar wave, so a red shift is a scale up, and a blue shift is a scale down. At the front of the train there is a scale down. At the back of the train there is a scale up.  A rainbow is therefore a scalar rainbow. The size to wave relationship is through individual particle pockets which are aligned to become waves. A rainbow looks like a curved packet of Rice Crispies at the quantum scale. The small crispies  shrunk to fall to the bottom of the big Crispies in the bag looks similar to photon pockets.

A person standing on this train experiences similar bow shock forces.
A person standing outside of the train has none of this Data.

So the frames are now frozen.

If the train is accelerating the zero particles change from convex to concave and forming the holes as an area of least resistance ahead of the train. Concave zero particles have an inward flow of time particles, and this flow acts as a bond (The waterfall is concave, you put your hand in it and your hand moves into the waterfall. It looks like a pull force, but is a quantum push force.) The zero particles can't escape under acceleration pressure. Time as a spring is under pressure. Magnetic bubbles are forming from electron spin speeds coming from increased G force. Zero particles are scaling down gravity into magnetism.

Train reaches a constant speed. The convex particles now bump away as less become concave. The convex geyser effect of time has regained momentum.

The thing is to think of the physics acting out Relativity as a Quantum flow. Two people do not share the entire flow of physics. The single frame is flowing towards the next frame.

Do not confuse time with Past, Present, and Future however. That's a big mistake. Time is always present time. The time dilation of a clock is a restriction of time energy. Time energy is a force limited to a small atomic sphere. It cannot escape it's own sphere, it's trapped. There is no arrow, there is a scalar sphere reducing to a snowflake, then into a point. If you test out the time physics on ageing then you get a result from limiting the energy loss of the test subject. That's not a time result in the sense of Past, Present or Future.

Time in most cases does not exist. It is just a force the happens inside a point where it propagates the X /Y /Z forces. A scaler vortex of Russian Dolls. A geyser where the water can fold inside out on itself... a super liquid, condom, geyser flow force.

It is quite complicated. And it is easy to make a mistake in this mixture of physics. So I may have missed something, or got something backwards. It's easy to get something backwards when a particle can take on the opposite physics by folding inside out...

Water scales up into ice, and ice scales down. The physics reverse. Water can be crushed into magnetism as well.

 

[Pincho (OP)]

The image above of a photon stream, spin, and scalar change is not totally at the Quantum Scale. I mean that there are smaller physics happening that aren't in the picture, quite important details actually...

Spin Spin...
Newtons Kissing Problem has a hidden 13th ball that can never be fitted. Zero particles perform scalar changes which are like mini waterfalls. The exchange of energy between scalar particles creates scale equalization. So Newton's Kissing Problem in this case uses same sized particles, and the waterfall flow is Time which is smaller, and builds the same sized particles. The 13th ball that can never be fitted allows all particles to spin around the central particle. That spin is......... Spin Spin.

You have a hollow propagator, so it's spin directs the flow invisibly. So what we see has another invisible spin which points energy towards the area of least resistance. In the prism above the spin spin would point towards the largest mass area of the prism, because mass is holes, and holes are electrons. So the spin spin points towards the electrons first, and this is the passageway to the area of least resistance for gravity.

Now the spin spin is a very useful physical device. It directs flow, and it creates bonding. The bonding is created by the fact that the spin spin has open ends, but a more closed middle area. It looks like a Gyroscope inverted to be hollow made from Newton's Kissing Problem. The 6 balls surrounding the middle area are the Gyroscope wheel. The other balls 3 at the top, and 3 at the bottom create the Gyroscope arms. You see the bonding in snowflakes, and the locking can rotate very rarely...

http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/009/281/i02/ig35_snowflakes_10_02.jpg

Above you see a snowflake which normally bonds in lines has a 90 degree rotation through the bonding. Similar things happen in other areas of nature, like trees, and DNA double helix.

One of the other important states of this bonding process is in creating the wave.

[Pincho (OP)]

What is a wave?

A wave is particle bonding through a spin spin. It looks like a line of hollow Gyroscope end to end which propagate energy through touch bonding. Newton's Kissing Problem applies to all of the touch bonding locations. So the touch bonding is often limited to 60 degree angles, or various cases of Newton's Kissing Problem angles. Touch bonding is created by concave effects with concave flow walls which act 'similar' to a pull force. So all waves are created by particles.

The two slit experiment with an observer helps the bonding to take place. So you get spin spin towards the detector. Without an observer the contact of the zero particles is lesser without any bow shocks from the observer to create the concave holes required for bonding. The system can rock without better bonding, so it is like the gyroscopes slowing down on a table, and rocking in this lesser energy state.

The rocking motion creates the waves in the sea. The bonding is weak, it swings around like little bridges that open to let the boats through. Little fishing floats with magnets on the ends is a real model that you could build. If you centrally balance the floats, and use a weak magnet you can get the little waves to happen, and open up. If you can arrange a 60 degree rotation with a hoop, and make sure that you have opposite poles then you can get an even better model.

So that is how a particle converts into a wave, and a line.

Particle Wave Duality.

[Pincho (OP)]

I first started this theory in about 2003. I look in the science news each day to see what new, undiscovered physics matches my theory. About 100 times I have found a new match. Today this is my match...

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348865/description/News_in_Brief_Particle_caught_flip-flopping

[Pincho (OP)]

So Quantum Physics of the spin spin directs the energy flows, and it has limited turning ability because the energy has to propagate through Newton's Kissing Problem, and the propagation creates areas of least resistance at 60 degrees, and perhaps 30 degrees in places.

So why doesn't the Universe look more angular?

Well the rotations are tiny, but of course we do see a lot of angles like trees, and limbs, and snowflakes. However a circle is a large fractal of a hexagon anyway, so you can see that the angles become fainter, and fainter the larger you get. But here's a nice example...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn%27s_hexagon

The Universe isn't smooth however. The fractal survives large scales.

Think about this fractal...

Newton's Kissing Problem with a time geyser in the middle, and a hole down through the two triangles at each end (There is a Kissing Problem around a sphere with two triangles in it). Well let's just apply this fractal to a human for a bit of fun...

A hole in the top.. the mouth.
A hole in the bottom... the bottom.
A geyser in the middle... The Urinary Tract
6 energy locations around a hexagon form... two arms, two legs, a head, and a tail.

Now I figure that comparing a human to a particle is too much for most of you. However not only are the shapes in about the right places, but the physics play similar roles...

A hole in the top propagates matter... the mouth.

A hole in the bottom releases the used matter... the bottom.

A hole in the middle releases a geyser as an energy flow... urination.

The 6 points act as propagators of information.. hands touch, feet touch, the head incorporates a complete new fractal of 6 new points from scratch. Two ears, two eyes, a tongue, and a nose. More information centres.

And the whole lot is propagated internally through a skin, which is about right.

So the fractal is in nature quite strongly.

Some Scientists probably dropped out way before this post, you need to be open minded to go with a particle fractal into a human form.

[Pincho (OP)]

This is a fractal where zero is made from a combination of forces. 1 + -1 = 0.

0 doesn't exist.

1 + -1 = 0 does exist.

The human language once more creates an illusion...

"I pulled the weed out of the ground to create a hole!"

The real Quantum version is...

"I pushed a weed out of a whole!"

The hole exists even with the weed in it. 1 + -1 = 0

And the hole which we call 0 for hole

should be changed to the whole. zero is the whole.

1 + -1 = THE WHOLE

and my theory becomes...

The Whole Particle Theory

which itself becomes...

The Theory Of Everything

[Pincho (OP)]

Using the above example changes the start point of the Universe. The Whole universe is flat energy. You can pull everything out of the flat energy like pulling a rabbit out of a hat. So the Universe can start off infinite, and then you can move the energy around to make it change shape. In fact the Universe has to start off infinite, and you cannot add one more, because 0 doesn't exist on its own.

The Universe is sculptured from flat energy like building an igloo from the ice. You build the Igloo, and you have a same sized hole. The igloo becomes something observable in a flat plane. The hole become the lesser observable negative. So the Universe doesn't need the Big Bang now, as it already contains all of the material on location. The Universe now needs the little ripples that push up out of the flat energy. Newtons Kissing Problem creates all of the little ripples, because the flat energy states are granular, and stack up, but also scale down. So the flat energy state means that a granular structure is not passing along information, and is therefore scaling down not to touch a local particle.

[Pincho (OP)]

This scalar structure can create outside bumps, and inner bumps. Using spherical particles you can create an outside bump through an outward flow force. The inner bump, the inner flow force.

There is a neat little trick to the inner flow force that helps energy to escape from an area of high resistance. The sphere can escape if they are away from particle walls. So to scale down moves them away from the inner walls of a sphere. If a particle scales down it must not bump into a particle inside itself, and if a particle scales up it must not bump into a particle outside itself. The final trick is to turn inside out, and put your outer wall inside your inner hole. The hole is able to create force by creating spin like a whirlpool uses a hole to create spin forces. Atoms however contain too many particles to scale up or down very much. Atoms are scalar restricted by inner particles. We see a world where scalar events rarely happen. But Gravity is not scalar restricted, and neither is magnetism...

When you use a bar magnet, and view the iron filings you can see shapes in those iron filings. The shapes represent the scaling pressures of gravity to magnetism. Gravity scales to magnetism to escape high resistance. The scale of magnetism determines if it touches any other particles in the scalar chain. Magnetism touches iron in the scalar chain of inner sphere sizes. So Iron experiences an inner bump force  of a particle that has scaled down to a negative scale. Magnetism is therefore a push force. All forces are push forces. Inner or outer, and it is important to remember that for Quantum Physics. Quantum Physics become spooky because of pull forces not existing. The trick of the mind. Treat physics as Quantum Physics, and the two things are the same.

[Pincho (OP)]

Proving the Theory of a Fractal Universe...

This whole thing is a fractal that can be created in a computer. So somebody, some day will easily recreate life in a computer.

...and people often say to me prove it with Calculus...

... Mathematics is the scientific method, however mathematics has been wrong since day 1, and Newton was in no position to choose another form of proof, as he did not know of computer models.

I am changing the rules of science. I am changing the rules of the proof.

So from now on, I am changing the rules of the proof. Proof of the Universe as a fractal is to recreate the fractal in a computer. The person that uses the least rules, and the least logic gates has the new leading model. Any output by the model does not count as part of the logic so long as the computer never uses the output as further input. This means that you can put numbers on the screen as results as often as you want, and if this lengthens the program it does not count as more logic gates. All scientist are allowed to judge the new model to say that it is truly smaller than the previous model. All scientists are allowed to judge that the output matches the actual Universe that we live in. I think that a scoring system is probably best...

Best match for actual Universe score
Smallest number of logic gates score

This is the new proof. The proof is allowed to be rewritten by the majority. But the majority must not have an alternative motive to change the proof back to mathematics. Mathematics is not proof.

[Pincho (OP)]

Why don't I trust maths?

With mathematics you can make a formula based on a falling object, and it's speed, and acceleration, and then you need to say what is happening. The words that you use like 'pull' can be reversed to 'push' just by changing the formula around to give the same end result. But the physics in the formula can be completely different with the same end result. I think of mathematics as the Mario World formula. You can make a measurement, and recreate the measurement Mario style. I don't want a creativity to be allowed in the formulas that describe the Universe. I want to give the formulas their own creativity.

The fractal formulas.
Take a look again at Conway's 'Game Of Life'..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life

It is creating fractals and movement, and the fractals have rules to obey. You can take this to the next level. You can change the rules to copy the Universe rules that I have been talking about in this thread. The scalar rules, and energy propagation rules. You can change the grid to a particle stacking system shaped grid. You can add the Quantum Physics as rules.

The result (if you get everything right) will be The Universe. A complete copy, self building, with the same physics. It is easier than you think. The Universe has no intelligence in its creativity, so simple bump forces are all that you need. If you want to make it look realistic you need to take into account the human sensory system. So to add colours you need to identify those colours as whatever physics make sense in the program to become colours. You might find a wave, you might find a spin, or you might find a scalar change. You might find a scalar change that changes a spin, and becomes a wave. You could create an artificial eye in the program to just read the incoming fractals.

I am saying that the fractal includes fractal physics, and is self building. The proof of the system is that the output should match the Universe without human creativity as part of the process. So the computer model is better than mathematics. It is repeating the same creativity as fractal rules, and there is no point where human intervention takes place. Nobody shouts 'pull' and shoots a skeet.

The other important thing  is that there is no Freefall, and no Vacuum, and no Pull forces. Everything is propagated by the grid. If you think of the grid as a scalar energy field then the energy is constantly flowing through the system. Moving an object from A to B has to be complete with physics. That's another thing that Mathematics fails at. Mathematics allows you to use X/Y/Z as Action At A Distance. A fractal shouldn't be allowed to do that. If you move something, you have to propagate it, and therefore you have to always be in physical mode.

I know how to do it, I have been programming since 1980. I think of myself as an original programmer of the modern age. I think in programming language, and can run the programs in my head. I did a poll, and asked if programmers could run programs in their head before they write the programs, the majority was 'Yes'.

So I am writing on these pages the close approximation of the physics of the computer program that I can see in the fractal. They are all Cause, and Effect physics. One type of physics leads to the next. Water crashes against a rock, chips it away, creates sand, the sand stacks according to its shape, the smaller bits drop through the bigger bits through vibrations.. a fractal is forming. The zero particle is like that. But the zero particle creates all of the physics from beginning to end. So the zero particle created the water that started it all off, and the zero particle created the Earth, and the zero particle created the electron, and the zero particle created space, and time.

The zero particle is the grid, and the energy, and the fractal, and the location, and the path of Cause, and effect. It just bumps.

[Pincho (OP)]

I've talked about about the Standard Model which to me has many Paradox "What's outside the Big Bang?" Which is a Paradox before you even bother talking about the Big Bang.

What about String Theory?

I think that string theory is most likely based on the fractal flows that Zero Particle Theory creates. So Zero Particle Theory is probably Quantum String Theory. In other words I don't use the strings, I build the paths that look like the strings. A string therefore is a necklace of Zero Particles. If the people using string theory were as strict as I am, they wouldn't allow the creation of mechanics to happen as a cause of the effects. The string theorists would have to sit down and create the strings before they have a theory at all.

And the chances are that the strings are Newtons kissing Problem. That's my analysis of String Theory. It requires the fractal that creates the strings. Then the Dimensions are simply paths through the fractal. Which takes away all of the strangeness of dimensions.

[Pincho (OP)]

What is hot, and what is cold?

Now, once you have the general physics sorted out, they just repeat a lot. So working out what everything is at the quantum scale is just a matter of picking from a selection of those physics.

Hot, is for particles to touch on the inside of your particles so that they scale up a bit. The up-scale now shows why hot air rises. Again the hot air rising is the Rice Crispy effect, and it is the small particles moving through the gaps between the hot particles that moves them up. Hot also smooths out crinkles by the inflation and stretching of an area.

Therefore the opposite is cold. Cold is to touch particles on the outside so that the particles scale down. Particles have a flow towards their nucleus through a hexagonal snowflake structure. This structure is therefore not smooth but jagged. The old person has a flow like this, and the jaggedness creates the wrinkles in their skin.

Now we have the rice crispy effect rising into the air, and a rainbow is a scalar rainbow.

Do you see how I re-used all of the physics? It's a fractal, the physics repeat.

[Pincho (OP)]

The Rising, and falling of scalar particles is part of the Granular Convection phenomenon...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granular_convection

So Red shift could also be the same phenomenon in space. And that would be my first choice. I think that the Universe is using scalar particles in space, and that they create pressures around planets, and suns. The pressures scale down into the electrons, and come back out as magnetism. The magnetism is a negative scale which can be larger than a positive scale when it is inverted. -5 is larger than 4 because magnetism fills a larger negative hole. The negative particles then leave the planets, and suns as part of a bow shock, and just to escape the incoming Gravity. The negative particles then head out to create a red shift from the spin of the photons that fill them up. And spin, and scale are colours that create waves that match those colours. That's 3 ways to collect colours using different methods. The prism, and the rainbow then display that scaling by splitting apart the colours through scaler spins.

[Pincho (OP)]

The larger picture of the Dark Energy in the Universe also has the fractal that I am discussing. Like I said earlier the most likely way to have hexagons all facing in one direction is that particle stacking rules are obeying Newton's Kissing Problem. And Newton's Kissing Problem averages out as a hexagon.

This image was stated not to have a fractal in it, but it has a hexagonal fractal in it if I bend the grid over the image...