[Pincho (OP)]

Quantum Mechanics....

I like Richard Feynman, and I have just started watching the YouTube videos of him. I like his enthusiasm, and he says some things the same as I do, and asks the same questions. I still think however that his limitations were to do with using mathematics. Here he talks about Quantum Physics....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeBkMzSLA8w

Sometimes, I find that his thoughts are what I call pre-computer thoughts. The mathematics wasn't so visual as typing a program into a computer, and watching the physics for real.

This video includes water tension, and jiggling atoms...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pYRn5j7oI

And again I find that his ideas have strayed slightly away from real images. So maths isn't working to portray images all that well.

At the end of the Quantum Physics talk RF wants a real image of an atom, and he wants to know about the real image of an electron. He says that mother nature will always make us ask new questions, and simple physics will never be revealed.

Quantum Physics is very simple. We tend to surpass it with our ingenious thinking, and evolution. You have to become the person that doesn't agree with X/Y/Z location as a Relative position. Don't take anything for granted, and don't be smarter than the Universe.

The atom, and the electron are quite huge compared to time. Now most people don't imagine time as a set of physics, but it is just a scalar liquid. So physics are simpler that RF thought. The reason that electrons behave in a strange way is because they are holes...

The mysterious Electron...
 A hole in a flow of gravity is dependant on the flow to reveal the hole's nature. So imagine the electron as a hole, and Gravity as a scalar liquid. This scalar liquid turns into magnetism, and magnetism flows out of the hole, and so the hole is empty for C, and then fills with Gravity. The hole also has a whirlpool around it, and any overflow fills the nucleus. The nucleus scales down into time, and time is a storage of energy which can flow back out again to make a sun if it is compressed enough.

So I have created an image there of the atom. How many patterns can you make from these physics? Well the field is a field of points which are the outflow of magnetism scaling down to become areas of least resistance. The wave is a scalar wave, and works like a packet of Rice Crispies with small bits passing big bits. The nucleus is usually full with an outflow which you can call Poise-Time. The electron orbits are just whirlpool holes, and observation of these holes fills them up, so moves them to some other area of least resistance. And the formation of the holes, and their patterns obeys Newton's Kissing Problem.

You can go smaller than that.. there are Quantum, Quantum Physics...

Which is where I started off many years ago. I worked forwards from Quantum, Quantum physics to the atom. It made it easier. The really small physics are just points, and bubbles.
And that is where 1 + -1 = 0 begins. And that is where location, and direction, and speed, and acceleration are stored as scalar physics, inflation, and deflation.

I wish I could talk to RF, I think I have gone way smaller than the atom, and I think that it is thanks to computer programming. I wish I had the computer powerful enough to run it all at the scale of a Galaxy.

[Pincho (OP)]

Nature have posted a new video of atoms...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/29/nanoparticle-3d-imaging-atom-dislocation-video_n_2972249.html?utm_hp_ref=science

Could there be the same fractal in there that I am using?...

[Pincho (OP)]

The Gravity Tearing of Spacetime

This is a very important post for those that can follow it. It describes the creation of everything.

Spacetime is made from a scalar grain structure. All you have to do is imagine a lot of bubbles that obey particle stacking rules... they do not stick together in other words, they scale down slightly so as not to touch. Without touching they pass no message, so the planck telescope cannot see them. It tries to get an image of spacetime, but they scale out of the way. This scalar property is the main part of the creation of all things.

Get each part in your head. So make sure that the above is consciously available to you.

OK so the next stage is that the scaling away from each other is like Braille, so they scale up to touch, and then scale down to avoid. The scaling is circular like 360 degrees back to zero, which means that the energy never has to stop moving. But it is also negative...

6,5,4,3,2,1,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6

Where the negative numbers are actually areas of least resistance for the positive numbers, so act as holes.

So 360 degrees works better as 180 to -180 degrees wraparound scaling.
Most of the time however the scaling is minimal.

The important image that you need in your head is to create the Galactic Black Hole from this scenario. So trap some scalar particles in an energy crossover from scaling patterns. You have all of these scalar particles doing a sort of Braille dance, and eventually some have to scale negatively, and the positive ones are bumped by scalar forces into this hole as though balloons were inflating next to them.

You should have an image of a forming Black Hole.

Make sure that you have some sort of Black Hole forming in your mind.

The next stage...

This part is the spacetime tearing to create the spiral arms.

With a hole appearing there is an inflation force towards the hole. There is a curve to this inflation direction. I can explain it in water tension. So now switch your mind temporarily to water tension, and a bulge.

Gravity on water in the Y is bent to a sphere, because a drop of water also has force in the X, and Z. It's pressure from Gravity as a push force. This is complicated, because there is air to add to the gravity pressure. All that the air is doing is adding weight to the gravity. The Earth was formed this way, and the moon without air, just a lighter force.

Get the image in your head of the water bending from forces in all directions. When you put the Earth below the Water there is a direction removed from any sort of option. Water can now tear diagonally through the structure, and pressure from above and to the sides firms up these directions. The fish evolve, and the shapes of these diagonally weak areas are part of the fishes shape. The fins diagonally through the weak areas, and the fish are flat in directions of pressure. The Octopus is the conical sort of shape, and the suckers show diagonal spherical forces. It's all there.

But now back to the Galaxy. You have a Black Hole forming, and it is the area of least resistance. The tearing that happens to water to create fish is much easier using scalar particles. They will scale themselves out of the way very quickly. The pressure is space itself towards the hole. You get these diagonal sliding scalar particles. You should have an image a bit like a snowflake forming. The particles sliding towards the Black Holes bump together in a grain fractal structure.

Get the image right. the particles are sliding towards the black Hole, the curves are like the curves created by water tension, the bumping is scaling down and tearing in lines, and the lines are twisting towards the hole like a screw from the rotation into the black hole.

The next stage of images...

Where the lines bump create weaknesses. More scaling, more holes. These new holes have new particles moving into them. This is sort of like the octopus tentacles with the suckers. The diagonal lines spin more in space so create whole sphere for suckers. The sphere filling with particles are suns. They are suns where the scalar bumping is creating light, and energy. Filling holes, scaling, bumping, and flashing.

Ok you got that?

If you have this image correct, think of this....

Diagonal tear towards Earth with bright filling light....

Lightening!

I hope some of you understood that. It's the creation of a Galaxy.. almost. The planets are the dust left behind near to the tearing.

That should give you a complete picture. But here's an image to help...

[Pincho (OP)]

That image I just gave you is fantastic if you can visualize it in your head. What you can now do is see a tree in reverse...

http://theoutdoorsnation.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/view-of-a-pollarded-hornbeam-tree-with-a-split-trunk-hatfield-forest-c2a9ntpl-paul-wakefield.jpg

Look at the tree, remember the cracks in spacetime, the areas of least resistance are the trunk. The leaves are the scalar particles feeding towards the trunk, and being squashed flat trying to get into this area of least resistance. So the areas of least resistance are in reverse, and the tree grows into these areas. So you wonder how they begin with a seed? The seed must be the reason for spacetime to tear at that point, and the reason for a tear is a hole. So a seed must contain some singularities. A bit strange in the standard Model, but very common in zero particle theory. Electrons are holes, but seeds must contain bigger holes than electrons that warp spacetime enough to crack it.

You may think that this sounds like a strange theory. However it is the standard model that is strange compared to the Universe. The Universe is the way that things happen, anything else is strange.

[Pincho (OP)]

Oh yeah, I've figured out how the seed tears spacetime to make a crack to grow in. The roots grow like a hand tearing through paper in reverse if you can imagine that. They create spin spin towards a big singularity. The big singularity is at the centre of the Earth. Thus spacetime gets a tear, and the tree can grow in the tear. So lightening hits a tree, because the tree has already started a crack for it to go into.

Ace.. I can't believe how much I am solving today.

[Pincho (OP)]

So Earth has life because Earth has a singularity, and the spinning magnetic field. It allows energy to split spacetime, and remove the gravity force for enough time to grow into. The other way is for water to shear to make gaps to grow into.

[Pincho (OP)]

A sun is a scaled up Octopus Sucker

That might be the strangest thing you have ever heard, but it's stranger than that...

The Sun is a scaled down octopus sucker.

Scale is often seen as a negative scale. The sun has more energy because it is the area of least resistance for gravity particles, so it has less scale than an octopus sucker, it is negatively scaled.

If you take a rainbow, the red is the largest colour, but is negatively scaled, so red is negative, and blue is probably positive. I haven't quite decided if blue is positive or not. It could be just less negative. So you look at the Earth, and the sky is blue, and the sand is red, and the plants are green it's all reversed.

This is all important for the Inverse Square Law anyway. As you move outwards with scalar particles they can fill a larger area. They still use Braille to touch, and scale down, so they create the Inverse square Law. This scalar touching passes a message which can be photons, and the Michelson and Morley experiment shows this to work that light will travel to the Earth quite nicely. It means that you can use the word Aether again. Here is an example...

[Pincho (OP)]

Where is all of the Anti-Matter?

Matter sits in an anti-matter hole all of the time. That is how a seed grows roots to split spacetime to grow a plant. All that the seed is doing is moving matter away from anti-matter. Us, and the plants are located inside spacetime.

We wear spacetime like a suit.

Maybe the sun is an Octopus sucker isn't the strangest thing afterall.

[Pincho (OP)]

Just in case you are reading the thread from the end without reading the beginning...

The sun is an octopus sucker's fractal physics. My theory is fractal based, and the fractal is not only scalar, but also alters the physics at the same time. It can be programmed into a computer to create the entire Universe. I just need a powerful enough computer to create a Galaxy, and that is the Theory Of Everything. A computer program that creates everything in the universe using a simple set of rules that repeat, and scale.

The sun is an octopus sucker shows how scale, and physics mean a lot. The sun is fractally the same, the way the sun begins uses the same physics as the octopus sucker. But water is replaced by Gravity Spacetime. Water and space use the same fractal. But water is scaler limited, and space is a scalar particle. Scalar particles create more energy than water because they have more freedom of movement. If I use capital letters to represent freedom of movement you get X/Y/Z/IN/OUT for space.. X/Z/y/in/out for water. The loss of energy in water reduces the power of the Octopus tentacles from a hot sphere, to a cold half sphere... a sucker. The tentacles are the Galaxy spirals. The energy is all reduced to the Octopus because of the atoms containing a lot of trapped particles. The trapped particles restrict the scalar ability of the atom. Like a bag full of rubbish is harder to squash down than an empty bag.

It isn't that strange in a fractal universe. Anyway I find the standard model strange with Past, Present, and Future, and Wave Particle Duality, and Action At A Distance, and Electrons with mass, and Pull Forces, and a Big Bang.

That's all very strange to me.

Look carefully... a Galaxy...

http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/field_notes/assets_c/2011/06/octopus_males_large_suckers-thumb-608x456-23825.jpg

[Pincho (OP)]

Check the sanity of this guy!

If you just type fractal nature into Google Images....

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fractal&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=uzI&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=Fy9YUYX4F4eS0QXm_4HQBw&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAQ&biw=939&bih=622#hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=YKy&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=fractal+nature&oq=fractal+nature&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l6.27654.29144.0.29545.7.5.0.2.2.0.58.287.5.5.0...0.0...1c.1.7.img.R7kpD3x1NPA&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44442042,d.d2k&fp=cd39a805ea130be7&biw=939&bih=622

Of course everyone knows that there are a lot of fractals in nature. But what is a fractal in nature?

A fractal in nature is a repeating set of rules combined with scale, and physics. Which is what Zero particle Theory is as well. The zero particle represents fractal scale zero. So it represents the first fractal that creates the Universe.

When scientists knock particles out of atoms they are nearly always in 6's. That's a fractal as well. So from the zero particle we are going up in 12's actually, because there are the anti-particles. And 12's are Newton's Kissing problem fractal.

So getting the shape right, and the physics right, you have a self building set of rules. Every up-scale needs to fit around, or inside the previous scale. Atoms represent a scale, and a rainbow represents the atomic scale in colour, and position. Change the colour, and change the position in the rainbow through the Rice Crispy effect.

I have tested parts of this in a computer, so it's the Standard Model that makes people crazy enough to think that I am crazy.

[Pincho (OP)]

Turning Arrows of light....

Richard Feynman came up with some interesting mathematics for light colour, and reflection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdZMXWmlp9g

He said that nobody understands it. It actually has a very similar principle to the physics that I am using for particle location, and Relativity Physics. Now, I am not sure if I am talking about the same thing, or not. All I know is that my physics use turning arrows, and create colours from scale during spin cycles. So it probably is the same thing. So I can explain in physics what is happening in Richard Feynman's video... I think.

Particles have directional physics, and relativity is physically embedded in spacetime. It's to do with the area of least resistance for a scalar particle that can fold inside out like half a tennis ball. And it is to do with Newton's Kissing Problem. Combined together you can figure out the physics of relativity.

The spinning arrows.
12 scalar particles can surround 1 scalar particle of the same size (Newton's Kissing Problem) there is room for a 13th ball that can never be fitted. the 13th ball can be used as the area of least resistance through newtons 3D structure. This area of least resistance is the spin of the arrows in Feynman's lecture... I think. You see, particles move towards this 13th ball as a direction memory. It's a scalar particle where the 13 ball is a guide. All of theses scalar particles have to sit in a hole in spacetime. The anti-matter is the hole that they sit in, and again you can just use half a tennis ball, and fold it inside out to create the anti-matter of matter. The colour is the scale of the tennis ball. So the rotation through for example red is larger than a rotation through blue. Pressure of a red sun is less than pressure on a blue sun, so the scalar change is a pressure change is a spin change, with a 13th ball of Newton's Kissing Problem creating all of these arrows that Feynman is using.

The arrow of direction moves towards the area of least resistance which is the scale outside of the particle. I call that the bow shock. So you have this internal arrow pointing towards the bow shock. The bow shock is the scalar collisions in spacetime between the space scalar grain. Earth has its own bow shock, and creates a scalar change in the grain structure around it. That is the area of least resistance Einstein called the bending of Spacetime. It is the scaling of spacetime in fact. So the arrow pointing towards a bow shock is where a particle travels, and if the particle moves near the Earth its own bow shock is added to the Earth's bow shock. So the Earth's gravity is added to the particles Gravity negatively. The area of least resistance therefore is towards the Earth now.

Now the rotating arrow, and the bow shock combined are like adding convex curves to concave curves. The total needs to be negative to move into the area of least resistance.

And that seems to match what Feynman was saying in the video.... I think.

So there are the physics which he asks about during his lecture.

[Pincho (OP)]

Past and Future Doesn't Exist... Time is a constant of the present.

I've found a video, that tells me why science uses the words Past and Future...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Kab9dkDZJY

Which tells me something about why scientists are so confused. You use pull forces, so obviously you can easily reverse physics, and I never thought about that before because I have no pull forces in my theory. Plus science uses mass for attraction, and I use holes the opposite.

Time is a constant of the present...not mass...not pull...but holes. If you are moving into holes you get this Rice Crispy scaling effect.. the holes get smaller as you move into them, you have to be smaller to move to the next level down. Big particles are pretty much stuck at the beginning. When the particles get really small they turn negatively into holes. The movement is created by the convex curves pressing against convex curves, a sort of balloon inflation propagation towards holes. Then holes fill up with smaller particles, and they become convex again. It's a sort of weather system like steam to rain to steam. Convex to concave to convex.

So the physics are cyclic, circular, never-ending, and so the physics are a constant. Time eliminates itself to a zero state. The snowflake is In, and the Sun is Out. There is no arrow, there is In, and Out added together = 0. Zero equals the present all of the time. Just the Present, and the present has no direction in particular. But there is always this inflation propagation, and no pull forces to reverse it. Particles are pushed into a hole, the hole fills up, pushes the particles out.. push.. push..push...push..... no pull.

It's strange that people really believe in Past, and Future. I always thought that the words were for science fiction movies like Time Machine. It's only recently that I realised that people actually thought that they were real. I'm 50, so for 50 years I have never believed in past, and Future.

Mind you.. I have never done any science. I wasn't taught science at school, and never had science at college. I taught myself using my own theory from scratch. I decided that I would ignore science, it is a bit kind of crazy.

I was just watching a video on the Feynman Diagrams. I mean he had time correct in those diagrams, so he should have realised what it is. He drew a sort of spring between motions, that is correct. I mean amazing being as he believed in pull forces.

I went somewhere else where the rules are simpler...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Kab9dkDZJY

[Ethos_]

Past and Future Doesn't Exist... Time is a constant of the present.

I've found a video, that tells me why science uses the words Past and Future...

For once, I find myself agreeing with you Pincho. I also don't see the need for these concepts.
The Present is all that makes any sense to my way of thinking. Nevertheless, I don't quite understand
what you mean by these holes you speak of. A hole in the fabric of space sounds a lot like string theory
to me. With the added dimensions this theory brings to the table, one might be able to add the concept
of holes. But that would need a completely new understanding of space.

What is the physical nature of these holes?
Can you describe them mathematically?
If holes exist in space/time, how do we prove they existence?
Without empirical evidence, this only becomes philosophy and not science.

[Pincho (OP)]

Past and Future Doesn't Exist... Time is a constant of the present.

I've found a video, that tells me why science uses the words Past and Future...

For once, I find myself agreeing with you Pincho. I also don't see the need for these concepts.
The Present is all that makes any sense to my way of thinking. Nevertheless, I don't quite understand
what you mean by these holes you speak of. A hole in the fabric of space sounds a lot like string theory
to me. With the added dimensions this theory brings to the table, one might be able to add the concept
of holes. But that would need a completely new understanding of space.

What is the physical nature of these holes?
Can you describe them mathematically?
If holes exist in space/time, how do we prove they existence?
Without empirical evidence, this only becomes philosophy and not science.

Well I will start off with Feynman again, because he could have grasped my ideas, he was so close. Yet he would have hated my approach of not using mathematics....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITpDrdtGAmo

A hole in spacetime is just a negatively scaled particle. Imagine with water, and a sponge. We put a heater in the middle of the sponge, so that any water entering the sponge is evaporated away at the same speed that the water enters the sponge. So the sponge is always empty. That is electro magnetism. Gravity goes into an electron hole field in an iron bar, it is spun around by the spinning field that was created by the coils earlier on. The Gravity is evaporated away to keep the Iron Bar constantly empty of Gravity. Now its a bar of spacetime holes.

Why don't I use mathematics?.. because it has never worked for genius like Einstein, and Newton. So what chance have I got?

I intend to write a computer program instead. It's better, because it creates the maths instead of the other way around.

EDIT: Oh yes I forgot to complete the physics for the spacetime holes in this post. Spacetime in my theory is a scalar grain structure. So it isn't a vacuum, or a void. It's almost completely full of material, so you only need to separate the matter to make a hole.

[Pincho (OP)]

The relation of Physics and Fractals

Feynman lectured The Relation Of Mathematics, and Physics...

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SrHzSGn-I8

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IESoWfM3cyc

And in this discussion he has an idea for Gravity, and he quickly dismisses it. Mathematics he says is the answer, and the ideas don't seem to work.

Well, in fact it seems to me that he had the right idea, and blew it by turning to mathematics. He was lacking the complete idea, because he had mathematics to turn to, and the mathematics drew him away from the real answer.

So I use a fractal of physics instead. Total physics, that I can scale up, and down like an Abacus of physics.

The real answer to the gravity problem was that as the Earth moves towards the scalar particles they scale down faster, and that is the bow shock. It is scale that creates the force, so the force is scaled down by the movement towards it. The Net result is zero change. You evaporate the Gravity faster in a sense.

So I believe I am right that with such a huge theory as the Theory Of Everything, it is better to have a solution that you can work with like the Universe works with physics. The Universe doesn't know mathematics, it creates fractals, so I think in physical fractals, and then they can go into a computer.

And a picture of the Bow Shock which explains it a bit better...

[Pincho (OP)]

So I have been talking about natural shapes being created from a fractal. The fractal is based on the fact that I use spherical particles in my theory, and sphere stack in a particular way. I use sphere because a force in every direction from a point is a sphere, and the force from every point I use is scalar energy, and that scalar energy is what you call time.

To actually see the diagonal shearing through a liquid I can show you a video, that not only includes the shearing, but also includes nature's shapes...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqAAlSba7Ns

If you watch carefully, the shapes start off with diagonal lines through the liquid. The diagonal lines are due to the particle stacking system, and the pressures on that stacking system. You can get starfish shapes in this liquid. But really all you have to do is look at the ocean for diagonal shears in creatures.

Then when you realise that liquids with forces often break diagonally, and you change space into a scaler liquid. You can recreate the physics, but now you also have heat. Because scaler particles create photons, and electrons. So the same patterns have extra energy.

[Pincho (OP)]

Earlier I showed my bow shock bubbles, Voyager actually found them some years after I posted about them....

http://www.universetoday.com/86446/voyagers-find-giant-jacuzzi-like-bubbles-at-edge-of-solar-system/

But the difference is that I use them for all particles as locating physics.

[Pincho (OP)]

Mathematics to Physics

Energy
e = mc2

Force of Gravity
f = gm1m2/r2

I often say that mathematics isn't much of a proof to physics. Well not in my theory anyway. If I describe the mathematics in my theory it uses different physics than is implied above.

If I start with e = mc2, and I describe it in my theory...

Energy equals the flow of Gravity into and around electron holes, creating spin, scaling down into a new hole at C squared, and flowing out again. That's what I say is happening.

If I was writing the Calculus it would be..

e = HoleC2

Only the description has changed. But physics is a description, and maths is a measurement. The proof is the description + the maths. I feel that if the description is wrong then the proof is wrong. Anyone can measure something, the description is the tricky part.

f = gm1m2/r2

My version... The flow force of Gravity is taken from the holes in one body compared to the holes in another body over a distance. The direction is towards the area of least resistance which is the body with the most holes. Which is...

f = GHole1Hole2/r2

Still no change to the mathematics. Just a different description. Mass is made from holes, and the important part of the description is that it removes the pull force, and changes it into a flow force.

My description is different, the maths is the same, but.. you can't have a Big Bang with my description. You change history just by changing a word. That's my point about mathematics not being a proof. The maths can work, but the words are just as important, or maybe even more important.

So I just use the words, skip the maths, and use a fractal, which copies nature. I'm a sort of Darwin of Physics. I explain nature like Darwin explained evolution. In fact I slightly change evolution into some fractals as well.

[Pincho (OP)]

Rubber Bands and poise time

I have no pull forces in my theory, so rubber bands need explaining to account for a stretch which moves back together again. It's quite simple really...

With Gravity playing the part of the push force towards the rubber band it plays the part of the compression. The outward flow is against gravity, and flows from holes in the nucleus, and that is poise time. Poise time is a bit like shaking a can of fizzy pop to create an outflow. The particles are inflating, and acting like a geyser from a hole. It's like removing the plug from the hole, and then Gravity can flow in faster. Rubber is squeezed out of trees, and has been through compression forces. It is the spin, and compression of material into the nucleus that creates the scalar energy of poise time. Now you may think that gravity is too weak a force for the elastic contraction, but Gravity is a flow into electron holes, and rubber must have quite a few electrons in it for a better flow force. Well rubber has static electricity so there is a sign of electrons there.

(Poise Time is time as Point scalar energy without past present, and future)

[Pincho (OP)]

Converting My Theory Into The Standard Model

OK, I hate using words like Pull, and Polarity, and Standard Mass, but nobody seems to be able to understand the Quantum Physics that I am using. So for once, here is the theory using the standard model, and your own words....

The Zero Particle is a Positron, and an electron combined 4 times. Positrons are scalar particles that can scale negatively into an electron by folding inside out, and electrons are also scalar particles. The positron has a push force on its outside, and if you flip the positron inside out, the push force pushes inwards to become a pull force. It turns into an electron, and with the forces pushing towards an electron nucleus. The electron nucleus creates scalar pressure, and can scale particles down even further. Electromagnetism is to scale down combined positron electrons acting as Gravity into electron positrons acting as magnetism. There is a speed limit to the scaling of C, but scaling can get trapped to slow down like at the end of a magnet to get a repelling force. Space is made from positron electrons, but science is not acknowledging that Positrons are scalar particles, and is not acknowledging that they can fold inside out. Positron electrons scale away from each other so as not to touch each other. This means that they do not pass a message in space, and become invisible. If they touch, they scale down, and then they scale back up again in a rhythmic pattern until they touch. This creates the Cosmic Microwave Background energy. The flow of this rhythm creates waves as the scales start to match between particles due to entropy. These waves of positron  electron energy sweeps through space, and create scalar waves, and photons.

The pattern that positron electrons create is a particle stacking pattern based on them all scaling to the same size. It obeys Newton's Kissing laws. So the patterns that they create eventually in nature show signs of a particle stacking system. But first you have to get the positron electrons to flip inside out into electron positrons. To create electron positrons you have to trap positron electrons in a scalar wave from all directions. If you look at newton's Kissing Problem...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kissing_number_problem

... you are trying to trap a positron electron in the middle of 12 other positron electrons with a force that will knock it into an electron positron. The electron positron will then attract more positron electrons, and they will become trapped, and scale into electron positrons. Electron positrons combined with positron electrons, and trapped together create singularities that can stay open. So if you get enough of them you have a black hole. The spin from the positron electrons entering the pull forces of the electron positrons creates energy, and the electron positrons are trapped in the middle of the spin.

Now to keep this simple from now on an electron Positron will be called an electron again, and a positron electron will be called a positron again. You just have to remember that they can flip inside out to change polarity.

Electrons are also scalar particles, they scale negatively, so become bigger pull forces. The electrons on Earth are not trapped, so are not behaving as scalar particles. Scalar particles only scale slightly until trapped. When you see the sun sending out solar flares, they are scaled up electrons behaving as holes for even more particles. A hole is a pull force that positrons fall into by scalar bumping each other into the hole. When a positron sits in an electron hole of exactly the same size the forces are neutralised, and you cannot see either the positron, or the electron ( Going back to positron electrons the zero particle is 4 times positive negative, neutral, negative positive remember?), so you get the Zero particle... space.

Just to remind you again... The Zero Particle is Positive, negative, neutral, negative Positive. It eliminates all of its forces to become...

1 + -1 + 0, + -1 + 1

The zero is a gap in spacetime. The gap in spacetime is sitting in a much larger particle the size of the Universe. We can't communicate with this huge particle, so the gap acts as a straight line through a curve. You can imagine changing the numbers...

Convex, Concave, flat, concave, convex.

Which is an apple shape with an apple core, and a stem. Nature is taken from all of these forces.

So that is part of my theory explained using the standard model. I feel strange using words like pull etc, because they are incorrect. I can't really use the word Positron, electron, neutral, electron positron. So I call it the zero particle. It is like a bubble with layers. But scales out of trouble, and so cannot be destroyed in any way.

The electrons in electromagnetism scale down positrons into electrons, and then scales down electrons into larger negative numbers. Large negative numbers actually grow in size. The reverse of what you might imagine. So you get large hollow sphere which act negatively as holes. But if you can trap the expanding sphere even more, the negative sphere growing larger will flip back into positrons.

If you now understand the physics, you have no need for Dark Matter, or Quantum Physics. This solves all of the problems in science. But I don't like explaining it in this strange way.

Oh yeah.. time.

Time is the scaler effect of the electron nucleus which forces scalar particles to get stuck in the middle. These particles build up energy when the electron has nowhere to scale to get away from the forces. If a particle becomes scalar locked like this it has a nucleus that we call time. Energy trapped to escape as scalar energy is time. I call it Poise Time.. Point Scalar Energy Time.

The electron therefore creates the atom with a nucleus, and scalar energy as time. Combined electron, positron forces create everything in the Universe, and I know how to write the computer program to do it in a computer.