The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban

  • 6 Replies
  • 3486 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe L. Ogan (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 476
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« on: 19/06/2013 20:45:00 »
Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Bang happened.  Thanks for comments.  Joe L. Ogan
Logged
 



Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5093
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 64 times
    • View Profile
Re: Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« Reply #1 on: 20/06/2013 08:37:44 »
The usually quoted figure for the mass of the observable universe is 6*10^51 kg assuming the universe was compressed to Planck density 5.1*10^96 kg/m^3 then it could be contained in a cube of side approximately 1.176*10^-15m or a sphere of 0.654*10^-15m radius.
« Last Edit: 20/06/2013 12:27:56 by syhprum »
Logged
syhprum
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9177
  • Activity:
    75%
  • Thanked: 912 times
    • View Profile
Re: Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« Reply #2 on: 22/06/2013 11:04:12 »
Assuming that there has been no fundamental change in the laws of physics, the universe with this density would have formed a black hole with a Schwarzschild radius of about 1025 meters (about 10 light-years).

The Schwarzschild radius of a black hole rs = 2GM/c2
Where
  • G is the universal Gravitational constant
  • M is the mass of the object
  • c is the speed of light
« Last Edit: 23/06/2013 12:33:36 by evan_au »
Logged
 

Offline Pr. snoerkel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« Reply #3 on: 22/06/2013 12:40:20 »
I have been using the same argument to speculate that the big bang could not have happened that way. But now I am not so sure. My thinking is like this:
 Assuming that the Universe started off having no mass (because it contained nothing but photons without rest mass), then - when matter formed - the size of the universe would be considerable. Gravity would only come into being then, and since the gravity could only radiate with the speed of light, it would take some time for any particle to "feel" the effect of the rest of the matter. In the meantime the matter would continue to move away from the center of the big bang at near light speed.
Is it possible that once a particle is affected by the full force of the rest of the matter, it is already far beyond the Schwarzchild radius?
Logged
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« Reply #4 on: 22/06/2013 19:44:26 »
A couple of questions come to mind, here.

1. Does a hole not have to be a hole in something?  If the Universe is all there is, in what could it be a hole (black or otherwise)?

2.  If there is no space outside the Universe, where (and what) would the Schwarzschild radius be? 
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



Offline Pr. snoerkel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« Reply #5 on: 23/06/2013 10:57:43 »
Quote from: Bill S on 22/06/2013 19:44:26

1. Does a hole not have to be a hole in something?  If the Universe is all there is, in what could it be a hole (black or otherwise)?

2.  If there is no space outside the Universe, where (and what) would the Schwarzschild radius be? 

I suppose that is right. If you cannot be outside a hole, is it a hole then? But that is metaphysics. From inside the hole it does not matter what, if anything, is outside. The characteristics of the hole is - according to science -that everything is located in a singularity. That is not what we see, so we conclude we are not inside a black hole.
Logged
 

lean bean

  • Guest
Re: Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Ban
« Reply #6 on: 23/06/2013 13:04:27 »
Quote from: Joe L. Ogan on 19/06/2013 20:45:00
Assuming the universe was the shape of a ball, how large was it when the Big Bang happened.  Thanks for comments.  Joe L. Ogan

Joe
 You may be interested in this old web page…

Quote
The Universe was not concentrated into a point at the time of the Big Bang. But the observable Universe was concentrated into a point.

From  http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
« Last Edit: 23/06/2013 13:08:04 by lean bean »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How do we know the Universe is expanding, and expanding into nothing?

Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 43
Views: 14904
Last post 22/07/2020 05:10:15
by CPT ArkAngel
If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?

Started by Tornado220Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 16
Views: 5922
Last post 06/07/2017 10:35:51
by paulggriffiths
Where is the "edge" of the Universe?

Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 25
Views: 20788
Last post 01/04/2020 06:01:21
by hamdani yusuf
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 11878
Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
by yor_on
How do we "know" that the universe is expanding?

Started by PmbPhyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 5280
Last post 10/01/2019 10:20:39
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.148 seconds with 51 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.