The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?

  • 5 Replies
  • 6227 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« on: 04/08/2013 21:33:40 »
A gorilla image the same size as a box of matches superimposed into a chest CT scan was missed by over 80% of a group of expert radiologists

Read the whole story on our website by clicking here

  
« Last Edit: 04/08/2013 21:33:40 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« Reply #1 on: 21/08/2013 03:07:12 »
This is surely a Good Thing, and Bad Science.

The artefact was not a CT image of a gorilla that had been inhaled (gorillas do not have exoskeletons), but a set of pixels that, to the experimenter, looked like a 2-D outline pictogram of a gorilla. In fact it is a very poor representation - the upper limbs are far too short for any ape.

Suppose, instead of a superimposed artefact, there had been a set of true pixels that resembled a famous representation of Jesus, or a passage from the Koran, and 98% of radiologists reported this "miracle" instead of diagnosing the patient's illness. The story would surely have ended up in the Daily Mail (or a negligence claim) and not a journal with scientific pretensions.

Quote
However, the result is still quite dismal and highlights the fact that even a highly-trained eye can miss the blindingly obvious. 

Crap. Skill is about extracting signal from noise. Expertise is about assigning significance to the signal. 

A: "The aircraft at 10 o'clock is on a collision course with us"

B: "There's a child's drawing of a gorilla on the nose of the aircraft at 10 o'clock"

Spot the "dismal" pilot.   
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« Reply #2 on: 21/08/2013 04:45:46 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 21/08/2013 03:07:12
... Suppose, instead of a superimposed artefact, there had been a set of true pixels that resembled a famous representation of Jesus ...

or Mary ...


http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/pareidolia-in-the-brain/
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« Reply #3 on: 21/08/2013 09:24:42 »
Nice one, RD!

And an afterthought

Quote from: alancalverd on 21/08/2013 03:07:12
gorillas do not have exoskeletons

.... and even if they did, the (exo)skeleton - or any inhaled dense object - would be displayed in white, not black, on a conventional CT image.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline dlorde

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
Re: How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« Reply #4 on: 22/08/2013 19:20:57 »
I can see this result would be poor if the radiologists were actually looking for a tiny gorilla, but they weren't; they would have been looking for clinical signs of lung disease in the scans, which are surely not judged on their resemblance to tiny primates. They almost certainly examined the gorilla-shaped blob, assessed it's clinical significance, and moved on.
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21142
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How can a radiologist miss an inhaled gorilla?
« Reply #5 on: 23/08/2013 07:55:45 »
What worries me is that nobody, not even the experimenters themselves, noticed the alien Balinese dancer where the patient's heart should be. I've read the original paper, and she appears on every image.

"Dismal" doesn't describe it. We have clear evidence that our bodies are hosting a Terpsichorean invasion, but the government has suppressed the information.

Cockup or conspiracy? Bush, Blair, Brussels, Bali, or Bildeberg? Note  that the capital letters all look like a cross section of a human chest. 

Excuse me, there are a couple of men in black at the door, accompanied by a very large bloke in nurse's uniform.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.388 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.