The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New Physics
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

New Physics

  • 25 Replies
  • 13951 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline acsinuk (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 643
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Re: New Physics
« Reply #20 on: 07/09/2013 10:26:14 »
Hi both
We need new physics to explain the stability of the universe.  The standard model has failed spectacularly as WMAP has shown by only finding 4.5% of the required matter and a repulsive force 22.2 times stronger pushing the stars apart.
The reason why it will not balance is because the electric field forces have been totally ignored!   Imagine if you were to magnetize the universe with north pole at top.  Then all the stars would face upwards and repel each other.  WMAP have identified that magnetic force which is 22.2 times more powerful than gravity.

Further, if all planets and other star rotating materials are attracted to their own star by a similar 22.2G force then we begin to be able to balance the cosmos.  We need new physics with open minds to 3D electromagnetic effects
CliveS
Logged
A.C.Stevens
 



Offline dlorde

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
Re: New Physics
« Reply #21 on: 07/09/2013 13:18:09 »
Quote from: acsinuk on 07/09/2013 10:26:14
WMAP have identified that magnetic force which is 22.2 times more powerful than gravity.

Really? normally the electomagnetic force is 1036 times stronger than gravity... although it does fall off much faster with distance.
Logged
 

Offline acsinuk (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 643
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Re: New Physics
« Reply #22 on: 08/09/2013 12:04:09 »
dlorde,
That figure is for inside molecules!  I am interested in the new physics of the macro universe where pretending that magnetic forces are irrelevant is causing cosmologists problems
CliveS
Logged
A.C.Stevens
 

Offline dlorde

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
Re: New Physics
« Reply #23 on: 08/09/2013 14:32:13 »
Quote from: acsinuk on 08/09/2013 12:04:09
dlorde,
That figure is for inside molecules!
Inside and outside. It's a direct comparison between the two, regardless of context. Gravity is the weakest of all the forces by many orders of magnitude.

Quote
I am interested in the new physics of the macro universe where pretending that magnetic forces are irrelevant is causing cosmologists problems
It that case, I'm sure you'll be keen to make sure you get the physics correct.
Logged
 

Offline acsinuk (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 643
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Re: New Physics
« Reply #24 on: 09/09/2013 10:13:55 »
I agree that gravity is an attractive force of 1G that gentle pulls matter and antimatter together.  But it is not the only force out in space.
Inside molecules you are correct that there is a strong short range force of 10^25G which allows same charge protons to compress together by overcoming their electrostatic repulsion of 10^38G if they are nearer that 10^-15 metres, thus the conservation of charge law will hold true if the electrons [and their associated neutrons] are balanced inside the molecule.
But what of the external balance of charge across space? How are we to balance that? If the stars are made of antimatter then this would surely help in the overall balance of the universe.
The evidence is the solar wind. This is made mostly of + ionized hydrogen molecules which are moving DC wise towards us. Because of the necessity to always balance electrical systems this means there must be a flow of negative electrons in the opposite direction which I call the feedback return electrons which when they hit the sun release a mc^2 neutron of energy plus H+ ion back to us. Physicists have found both in space but seem to believe the electrons are moving towards us rather than away.  New physics is needed.
CliveS
Logged
A.C.Stevens
 



Offline acsinuk (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 643
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Re: New Physics
« Reply #25 on: 20/06/2014 19:03:16 »
For the latest post visit
http://magnoflux3d.wordpress.com/
Logged
A.C.Stevens
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.672 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.