0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Chemtrails are imaginary " highly dispersed aerosols.".
Quote from: Bored chemist on 06/08/2016 17:21:37Chemtrails are imaginary " highly dispersed aerosols.".Only in your disillusionary world.
I remind you that you earlier on in this thread pointed out that there's a difference between contrails (as in that picture) and chemtrails (as in the figment of your imagination).
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/08/2016 14:40:16I remind you that you earlier on in this thread pointed out that there's a difference between contrails (as in that picture) and chemtrails (as in the figment of your imagination).This is not a contrail. Educate yourself or stop spreading disinformation. This picture was taken by me as a photographic evidence of clandestine geoengineering activity.
And there is no way to distinguish it from a picture of a contrail (you already demonstrated that earlier) and thus it is not evidence of the existence of chemtrails.
There is no way to tell these "chemtrails" from contrails. They look identical.Even you got muddled (go back + check- you will see that I pointed out why you were wrong- it's do do with being able to see the end of something that you claim "persists".)If you say that you can tell- it's very simple- all you have to do is explain how.Until then once again, you have no evidence.
1 If you say that you can tell- it's very simple- all you have to do is explain how.
2 Yes it does-particularly when it's backed up by a clear reason; the fact that the same elements have been found in old ice cores.
...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGIN
So everyone is plotting? That makes it a conspiracy with hundreds if not thousands of participants. No wonder they were able to keep it secret! Your logic is faultless hooray! We have a hero in our midst.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/08/2016 18:47:071 If you say that you can tell- it's very simple- all you have to do is explain how.A contrail is invisible. It doesn't create a (persistent) thick white plume. The thick white plume is caused by condensation of the aerosol.
Seriously?You think a condensation trail (i.e. a con trail) isn't caused by condensation.The thick white plume is an aerosol.You don't even seem to know what the words mean.
A contrail is invisible.
The last picture I posted clearly shows that the aerosol is injected using a nozzle. Educate yourself and stop posting disinformation.
You're either blind or unable to recognize that the chemtrail plume is coming from the rear part of the plane. On this picture two nozzles seems used to inject the aerosol into the atmosphere.
The only thing that needs to be mixed with the fuel to achieve this is air.
However you make unsupported statements like "Commercial planes don't emit such thick white plume. "
Interesting and very relevant article:...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGIN
Quote from: chiralSPO on 16/08/2016 18:46:44Interesting and very relevant article:...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGINThere's nothing new there. Ken Caldeira is a leading scientist actively implicated in the research and development of geoengineering technology. However, at least this study suggest that the majority of "experts" are unable to tell the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail.
However, at least this study suggest that the majority of "experts" are unable to tell the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail.
You seem to have forgotten that you also showed that you were unable to tell the difference between a chemtrail and a contrail.In fact it seems that nobody can reliably spot any difference at all.That's consistent with the idea that chemtrails don't exist.Do you have any actual evidence that they exist?You certainly have not provided any so far, even though I have asked repeatedly.
I supplied some.You made it clear that you couldn't tell if it was a chemtrail or not."Commercial aircrafts don't emit thick white plumes, period."Yes they do.For example the ones in various pictures in this thread.
Meanwhile, I believe readers will assume that clandestine geoengineering activity is real.
Poor assumption. I think you are projecting your own beliefs on other readers.You still have offered no significant evidence that planes are being used to spray noxious chemicals for the purpose of geoengineering, no solid explanation of the motives of those doing this, let alone who "they" are or how they are paying for such a massive undertaking, or why the rest of the world is letting it happen (believe me, if it could be shown that the US was trying to alter the atmosphere for some nefarious reason, Russia would knock our chemtrailing planes right out of the sky; and if you think that Russia and US are working together on a big secret plan, you are crazier than I thought)In short: we still don't know from your posts who is trying to do what, and why. Furthermore, the "how" falls short on many levels (as shown by other members here): planes couldn't possibly put enough coal ash into the atmosphere to do anything substantial without there being an enormous fleet of them constantly criss-crossing the sky, carrying nothing other than toxic dust (and who is paying for that?). Coal power plants are already releasing tons (millions of tons) of particulates into the atmosphere, and people are working to reduce that, not increase it. That some people are trying to make jet fuel out of coal does not help your arguments, because the jet fuel they make has the properties of jet fuel, not coal...Maybe if you offered something more valid, there would be something worth discussing, but as it stands this is nothing more than a conspiracy theory.
I challenge you to take a picture of a flying commercial aircraft releasing a thick white plume...Meanwhile, I believe readers will assume that clandestine geoengineering activity is real.
Pointing out the truth (and backing it up with pictures) is not disinformation.
Unlike you, I have photographic evidences of chemtrails,
Well why don't you post it?So far you have not put forward any evidence of anything.(and saying I don't have evidence of the non-existence of something is just silly. You are the one who says they exist; so you are the one who has to provide the evidence)
What you posted was a picture of a plane and its contrail.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/09/2016 13:38:35What you posted was a picture of a plane and its contrail.A condensation trail cannot be produced from the jet engines of an aircraft. This is a typical error or propagandaterm to confuse people on the synthetic nature of theses chemical trails. The term "chemtrail" is correct to designate the aerosolized substance used for clandestine geoengineering purpose.
You don't know what a contrail is. A contrail is produced from the wingtips of an aircraft. See: ...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGINFurthermore calling a "contrail" a persistent high density plume is absurd. No "contrail" or wingtip vortices can persist in the atmosphere. A "chemtrail" is the correct term to designate what the propaganda (official narrative) defines as a "contrail". And I guess it's normal for non-scientific people to ignore the proper terminology since disinformation is omnipresent about the science of chemtrails. I'm just disappointed by your overall knowledge of basic science.
If you are going to cite wiki, use the right page. It will take you here...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGINwhere it's clear that the contrails are not at the wingtips.
Started by Felix Awuku