The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?

  • 4 Replies
  • 4022 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?
« on: 13/11/2013 19:15:30 »
During the evolution of the universe it appears that the formation of stars and galaxies was an inevitable consequence. Does this indicate a propensity for matter to assume the most compact and ordered state possible and is this a reason that matter forms into solids?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline spartaman64

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?
« Reply #1 on: 15/11/2013 03:03:47 »
Matter forms into solids when kinetic energy is no longer is strong enough to keep the matter from bonding with each other.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?
« Reply #2 on: 17/11/2013 22:58:44 »
Quote from: spartaman64 on 15/11/2013 03:03:47
Matter forms into solids when kinetic energy is no longer is strong enough to keep the matter from bonding with each other.

OK. To rephrase, why is there a reduction in kinetic energy?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Pmb

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physicist
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?
« Reply #3 on: 22/11/2013 05:39:42 »
Quote from: jeffreyH
During the evolution of the universe it appears that the formation of stars and galaxies was an inevitable consequence. Does this indicate a propensity for matter to assume the most compact and ordered state possible and is this a reason that matter forms into solids?
You're not clear on what you mean by "nature." In another universe with the same laws of nature but where only electrons existed that wouldn't happen. Is that the same "nature" as this one?
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Does matter naturally want to fit into the smallest space possible?
« Reply #4 on: 22/11/2013 23:29:45 »
Quote from: Pmb on 22/11/2013 05:39:42
Quote from: jeffreyH
During the evolution of the universe it appears that the formation of stars and galaxies was an inevitable consequence. Does this indicate a propensity for matter to assume the most compact and ordered state possible and is this a reason that matter forms into solids?
You're not clear on what you mean by "nature." In another universe with the same laws of nature but where only electrons existed that wouldn't happen. Is that the same "nature" as this one?

The properties I am discussing would only apply to what happens in the universe we inhabit. This cannot be applied to a universe with different laws of physics. Temperature has a direct link to gravitation in our universe. Temperature also has a direct link to solidification. A direct link between thermodynamics and gravitation needs a mathematical model based on particle physics. This should relate to mass-energy density, possibly but not necessarily, with an inclusion of a spin 2 particle. There appears to be a significant relationship between inter-molecular bonding and gravitational field strength. This is why a solid will fall to the ground and a gas will not. Gasses are more like fluids and fluid dynamics can be applied to gasses. Liquids are an intermediate state that will flow at the surface but do not remain stationary. Apologies for stating the obvious but these relationships need a new method of observation. What we think of as buoyancy is also not as straightforward as we imagine.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.722 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.