The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Does battery size limit sampling frequency of hearing aids?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does battery size limit sampling frequency of hearing aids?

  • 2 Replies
  • 2650 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
Does battery size limit sampling frequency of hearing aids?
« on: 12/12/2013 14:30:02 »
Eion MacDonald asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Thank you for interviews on hearing aids and tinnitus.

I recently got a hearing aid and your site answered many questions I asked in hospital but were not answered. Specifically about battery size limiting the frequency range sampled.

Thank you for this.

Perhaps hospitals should refer folk to your site for understanding.

Eion MacDonald

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 12/12/2013 14:30:02 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9019
  • Activity:
    76%
  • Thanked: 886 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does battery size limit sampling frequency of hearing aids?
« Reply #1 on: 12/12/2013 17:32:08 »
Modern hearing aids are marvelously complex devices* - but they consume far more power than the human cochlea, and so power consumption is a major constraint.

There is little difficulty in getting modern electronics to sample sounds with CD quality, recording sounds up to 20kHz with 16 bit resolution. Every smartphone has this capability, but they do require recharging regularly!

However, not much useful information is conveyed at frequencies above 10kHz, and many adults cannot hear frequencies above 10kHz. Most of the energy of human speech is below 3kHz, with some useful sounds extending up to around 6kHz (eg to help distinguish "s" from "f").

If someone has degraded hearing above 2kHz, and almost no response at 5kHz...
  • There is great benefit in boosting the sounds between 2 kHz and 4kHz to make human speech much more understandable. This has a big impact on quality of life, as humans have a bias towards communication.
  • However, there is no benefit in boosting the frequencies between 6 and 10kHz because there is little speech information in this part of the spectrum, and this individual will hear nothing in this frequency range anyway. You are wasting battery power on something that will bring no benefit, and possibly subjecting the surviving sensing cells in the ear to excessive excitation, leading to further hearing loss over time.
  • What you do between 4 and 6kHz probably depends on how important speech vs music is to you...
This does remind us that modern workplace safety rules prevent us exposing people to continuous loud sounds, as they destroy the sound-sensing cells in your ears. But many people intentionally subject themselves to the same damaging sound levels through their smart devices, which is likely to lead to later hearing problems - not so smart?

*Modern hearing aids can be reprogrammed through a computer as your hearing changes, and the two hearing aids talk to each other "behind your back" using wireless to help localise the source of significant sounds.
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9092
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does battery size limit sampling frequency of hearing aids?
« Reply #2 on: 13/12/2013 00:17:22 »
All other factors being equal, then the only parameter the size of the battery determines is how frequently you'll have to replace it. Very loud hearing aids will require more frequent battery replacement, or a bigger battery, because they use more power.

If your hearing range isn't what it was when using a hearing aid with a fresh battery,
then your hearing may have deteriorated since you first started using those aids :
if so adjusted/replacement hearing aids may be necessary.
« Last Edit: 13/12/2013 00:42:36 by RD »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is it possible for a "ant" to clone its self into a mans image and size?

Started by BentherdonthatBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 0
Views: 4752
Last post 15/10/2007 22:10:16
by Bentherdonthat
How does tree ring size vary depending on the tree age?

Started by murfBoard The Environment

Replies: 3
Views: 8537
Last post 02/03/2010 20:13:37
by frethack
From Einsteins "Relativity" what is the shape and size of the universe?

Started by jerrygg38Board General Science

Replies: 0
Views: 1980
Last post 22/09/2016 13:47:35
by jerrygg38
If you put electricity, magnetism, super heat, super cold in a mass the size of

Started by Nicholas LeeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 2772
Last post 05/08/2016 15:10:58
by syhprum
Is it possible to alter the frequency on different forms of "lightspeed" waves?

Started by liolinvBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 4896
Last post 28/10/2012 20:21:25
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.183 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.