0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: iko on 01/03/2007 19:06:41Vitamins 'could shorten lifespan'......may be they don't!I'll try to read the complete report, thenI might be able to comment on this.For now I just note that vitamin C didn'tdo bad things and vitamin D is not mentioned.ikod...I'm not sure, really, that vitamin supplements could 'shorten' lifespan...at least at the very beginning of life!Canada rules. Prenatal multivitamin supplementation and rates of pediatric cancers: a meta-analysis. Goh YI, Bollano E, Einarson TR, Koren G.Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto, and The Motherisk Program, Division of Clinical Pharmacology/Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Prenatal supplementation of folic acid has been shown to decrease the risk of several congenital malformations. Several studies have recently suggested a potential protective effect of folic acid on certain pediatric cancers. The protective role of prenatal multivitamins has not been elucidated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential protective effect of prenatal multivitamins on several pediatric cancers. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Toxline, Healthstar, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published in all languages from 1960 to July 2005 on multivitamin supplementation and pediatric cancers. References from all articles collected were reviewed for additional articles. Two blinded independent reviewers assessed the articles for inclusion and exclusion. Rates of cancers in women supplemented with multivitamins were compared with unsupplemented women using a random effects model. Sixty-one articles were identified in the initial search, of which, seven articles met the inclusion criteria. There was an apparent protective effect for leukemia (odds ratio (OR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.50-0.74), pediatric brain tumors (OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.60-0.88) and neuroblastoma (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.42-0.68).In conclusion, maternal ingestion of prenatal multivitamins is associated with a decreased risk for pediatric brain tumors, neuroblastoma, and leukemia. Presently, it is not known which constituent(s) among the multivitamins confer this protective effect.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 May;81(5):685-91.
Vitamins 'could shorten lifespan'......may be they don't!I'll try to read the complete report, thenI might be able to comment on this.For now I just note that vitamin C didn'tdo bad things and vitamin D is not mentioned.ikod
QuoteMaternal Dietary Risk Factors in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (United States)Jensen CD, Block G, Buffler P, Ma X, Selvin S, Month S....AbstractObjective: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, and the second most common cause of mortality in children aged 1–14 years. Recent research has established that the disease can originate in utero, and thus maternal diet may be an important risk factor for ALL.Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Aug;15(6):559-70. http://www.springerlink.com/content/t87661x864l14368/fulltext.pdfhttp://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=4987.0Is vitamin D deficiency in childhood leukemia an underestimated reality?Could cod liver oil - the old remedy, a relic from the past - help in theempirically arranged but clinically effective today's treatment protocols?...
Maternal Dietary Risk Factors in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (United States)Jensen CD, Block G, Buffler P, Ma X, Selvin S, Month S....AbstractObjective: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, and the second most common cause of mortality in children aged 1–14 years. Recent research has established that the disease can originate in utero, and thus maternal diet may be an important risk factor for ALL.Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Aug;15(6):559-70. http://www.springerlink.com/content/t87661x864l14368/fulltext.pdf
Quote from: iko on 21/07/2007 12:54:35Quote from: iko on 19/10/2006 09:05:56Thank you Zoey,for asking about my favourite quote. Well, to explain it properly, in a short 'essay' in english... it will take me more than a few minutes! But translating it is the easiest thing:"The sun gives life, the sun takes it back" These words concluded one of the best lectures I attended in my life. At the 3rd year of Medical school, General Pathology course, more than thirty years ago. Professor Mario Umberto Dianzani was our teacher, Dean of the Medical Faculty and a distinguished scientist, totally dedicated to his students. Later on he has been Rector of the University of Turin for several years before retiring.In those days biochemistry was 'the' thing: new cofactors and vitamins were deeply explored by medical research.I'm sure I owe to his excellent lectures my following research interest in cofactors."Aging of cells and living organisms" was the subject of the lecture.In less than one hour we went from the origin of life on our Planet to the present time.Volcanoes and oceans plus UV light to catalyze the synthesis of organic compounds (Miller's experiment), then nucleic acid formation after million years of random combinations.Primitive organisms, bacteria and algae. Again the sunlight creates energy through photosynthetic processes and here come trees and forests! Different species of primitive life, unicellular, multicellular towards more and more complex organisms, thanks to spontaneous mutations, natural selection and evolution. For the whole 'biosphere' survival is always tightly bound to its origin, to the sunlight.Sunlight and ultraviolet rays give energy and feed the whole system, nevertheless they are responsible -in the end- for lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. A series of biochemical reactions lead to senescence in multicellular organisms too.Complex systems are progressively deranged: skin, bones, muscles, nerves, glands and immune cells get older...diseases follow.The sun itself puts an end to our lives.Magic... http://blogs.bootsnall.com/Chuck/uploads/_Beautiful%20Sunrise.jpg "Il sole dona la vita, il sole se la riprende" Mario Umberto Dianzani, 1975.
Quote from: iko on 19/10/2006 09:05:56Thank you Zoey,for asking about my favourite quote. Well, to explain it properly, in a short 'essay' in english... it will take me more than a few minutes! But translating it is the easiest thing:"The sun gives life, the sun takes it back" These words concluded one of the best lectures I attended in my life. At the 3rd year of Medical school, General Pathology course, more than thirty years ago. Professor Mario Umberto Dianzani was our teacher, Dean of the Medical Faculty and a distinguished scientist, totally dedicated to his students. Later on he has been Rector of the University of Turin for several years before retiring.In those days biochemistry was 'the' thing: new cofactors and vitamins were deeply explored by medical research.I'm sure I owe to his excellent lectures my following research interest in cofactors."Aging of cells and living organisms" was the subject of the lecture.In less than one hour we went from the origin of life on our Planet to the present time.Volcanoes and oceans plus UV light to catalyze the synthesis of organic compounds (Miller's experiment), then nucleic acid formation after million years of random combinations.Primitive organisms, bacteria and algae. Again the sunlight creates energy through photosynthetic processes and here come trees and forests! Different species of primitive life, unicellular, multicellular towards more and more complex organisms, thanks to spontaneous mutations, natural selection and evolution. For the whole 'biosphere' survival is always tightly bound to its origin, to the sunlight.Sunlight and ultraviolet rays give energy and feed the whole system, nevertheless they are responsible -in the end- for lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. A series of biochemical reactions lead to senescence in multicellular organisms too.Complex systems are progressively deranged: skin, bones, muscles, nerves, glands and immune cells get older...diseases follow.The sun itself puts an end to our lives.Magic... http://blogs.bootsnall.com/Chuck/uploads/_Beautiful%20Sunrise.jpg "Il sole dona la vita, il sole se la riprende" Mario Umberto Dianzani, 1975.
Thank you Zoey,for asking about my favourite quote. Well, to explain it properly, in a short 'essay' in english... it will take me more than a few minutes! But translating it is the easiest thing:"The sun gives life, the sun takes it back" These words concluded one of the best lectures I attended in my life. At the 3rd year of Medical school, General Pathology course, more than thirty years ago. Professor Mario Umberto Dianzani was our teacher, Dean of the Medical Faculty and a distinguished scientist, totally dedicated to his students. Later on he has been Rector of the University of Turin for several years before retiring.In those days biochemistry was 'the' thing: new cofactors and vitamins were deeply explored by medical research.I'm sure I owe to his excellent lectures my following research interest in cofactors."Aging of cells and living organisms" was the subject of the lecture.In less than one hour we went from the origin of life on our Planet to the present time.Volcanoes and oceans plus UV light to catalyze the synthesis of organic compounds (Miller's experiment), then nucleic acid formation after million years of random combinations.Primitive organisms, bacteria and algae. Again the sunlight creates energy through photosynthetic processes and here come trees and forests! Different species of primitive life, unicellular, multicellular towards more and more complex organisms, thanks to spontaneous mutations, natural selection and evolution. For the whole 'biosphere' survival is always tightly bound to its origin, to the sunlight.Sunlight and ultraviolet rays give energy and feed the whole system, nevertheless they are responsible -in the end- for lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. A series of biochemical reactions lead to senescence in multicellular organisms too.Complex systems are progressively deranged: skin, bones, muscles, nerves, glands and immune cells get older...diseases follow.The sun itself puts an end to our lives.Magic... http://blogs.bootsnall.com/Chuck/uploads/_Beautiful%20Sunrise.jpg
...Location of active bone marrow in an adult:link: http://www.aurorahealthcare.org/yourhealth/healthgate/getcontent.asp?URLhealthgate=96475.html
Say someone is diagnosed as being severely deficient in vitamin D. Would that person Possibly be suffering, extreme exhaustion, weakness in the legs, arms etc. Maybe general feelings of un-wellness, or perhaps heaviness of limbs, degenerating bones, fractures,and unusual wear and tear on bones? Maybe even aches in the joints and such problems..etc? Perhaps short stabbing pains in toes and bottom of feet and legs also? Could a deficiency of"D" cause any of these symptoms...?What concerns should one have when having severe deficiencies of "D".
Quote from: Kevan Gelling on 29/11/2009 20:15:52Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/11/2009 18:51:44What my mind is made up about is the assertion that "vitamins can do magic" is crap.Vitamin D is unique amongst vitamins because it's a pre-hormone and is part of the endocrine system. Genetic research from the last 10-20 years has revealed that vitamin D (as calcitriol) regulates many important functions throughout the body, including immunity, inflammation and cell propagation. These functions are linked to a number of morbidities.Ecological studies link latitude and skin colour to 'vitamin D' morbidities; cohort studies link low vitamin D levels with 'vitamin D' morbidities; epidemiological studies show high levels of vitamin D deficiency by latitude and by skin colour; the few RCTs involving large dose supplementation show that vitamin D significantly reduces 'vitamin D' morbidities.Not "vitamins", just vitamin D; not magic, just science.You are exactly right Kevan,but we have to tell the whole story:why such a simple and cheap remedy is coming so late in modern medicine?I can give you some good reasons to 'justify' such a delay:- Vitamin D is not a vitamin, but a steroid hormone acting on specific cell receptors.- The dosage in serum is tricky and expensive: large studies are coming out only now.- Normal levels are expressed in ng/mL or nmol/ml, just for the fun of it...- The active form, calcitriol, has been improperly used instead of replenishing 25-OHvitD pool.- Toxicity has been overestimated: 400U/day failed where 2000U/day are making the trick.- Cholecalciferol or vitamin D3 is a 'generic' drug, too cheap to support clinical trials.Do you want to play the doctor?Just read this amazing case report, free-fulltext from Canada:http://www.jabfm.org/cgi/reprint/22/1/69Now look for a chronic-back-pain patient, get a history of lack of sunlight exposure, no cod liver oil or vitamin D supplements and suggest her/him to have 25-OHvitaminD tested.If the result is below 20 ng/ml...Bingo! Send her/him to a doctor for a 50kU/week x 8weeks prescription. A clinician will exclude any condition of vitD toxicity or intolerance and monitor calcium levels if necessary.The following two-three weeks might be really magic for that patient...Unbelievable? On my part, I don't think so anymore! []Improvement of chronic back pain or failed back surgery with vitamin D repletion: a case series.Schwalfenberg G.Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada. gschwalf@telus.netThis article reviews 6 selected cases of improvement/resolution of chronic back pain or failed back surgery after vitamin D repletion in a Canadian family practice setting. Pub Med was searched for articles on chronic back pain, failed back surgery, and vitamin D deficiency. Chronic low back pain and failed back surgery may improve with repletion of vitamin D from a state of deficiency/insufficiency to sufficiency. Vitamin D insufficiency is common; repletion of vitamin D to normal levels in patients who have chronic low back pain or have had failed back surgery may improve quality of life or, in some cases, result in complete resolution of symptoms.J Am Board Fam Med.2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):69-74.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/11/2009 18:51:44What my mind is made up about is the assertion that "vitamins can do magic" is crap.Vitamin D is unique amongst vitamins because it's a pre-hormone and is part of the endocrine system. Genetic research from the last 10-20 years has revealed that vitamin D (as calcitriol) regulates many important functions throughout the body, including immunity, inflammation and cell propagation. These functions are linked to a number of morbidities.Ecological studies link latitude and skin colour to 'vitamin D' morbidities; cohort studies link low vitamin D levels with 'vitamin D' morbidities; epidemiological studies show high levels of vitamin D deficiency by latitude and by skin colour; the few RCTs involving large dose supplementation show that vitamin D significantly reduces 'vitamin D' morbidities.Not "vitamins", just vitamin D; not magic, just science.
What my mind is made up about is the assertion that "vitamins can do magic" is crap.
ok Iko.. My tests vitamin "D" test came back at 12 and she said it was very very low.. supplements have been added 1 a week at 1.25mg for a 12 weeks. Only she said it shouldn't be that low while I am taking huge doses of omega 3 Vitamin. "D" and my thyroid screwed up now taking 175mcg levoxyl instead 150.Feel like crap and hurt everywhere specially in my bones etc...
I got two hours of that beautiful sunshine today and it makes me feel so much better!!http://photomed.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/frau-strand-sonnenschirm.jpg
in digits....12
Yap! Got it!http://www.medicineonline.com/drugs/V/1355/VITAMIN-D-ERGOCALCIFEROL-Capsules-USP-1-25-mg-SOFTGELS-Soft-Gelatin-Capsules-50000-USP-Units-R-only.htmlIt is vitamin D2(ergocalciferol)...It seems that you don't have D3 in the States, poor things [].But you have prof. Michael Holick!It is the right stuff and the proper dosage.See you in 10days (after the second pill!).Wish you all the best,ikod