The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. What is the best solution for green energy?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

What is the best solution for green energy?

  • 20 Replies
  • 11942 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    61%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What is the best solution for green energy?
« Reply #20 on: 19/04/2014 21:23:18 »
And that's where it all falls apart. Every unreliable source you add to the grid, just reduces the economic viability of the reliable ones. Once you get above 10% unreliables, you have to start switching off major baseload generators when the sun shines, and above 20% unreliables, it becomes completely uneconomic and even dangerous (remember Chernobyl) to supply baseload from nuclear reactors, which are designed to run at over 90% capacity. So in "going green" you are forced to increase the number of fossil-fuelled power plants or to reduce electricity from a convenient or essential source to an opportunistic and very expensive luxury.

And don't forget that electricity is not the most important use of energy. We use vastly more fossil fuel for direct heating and motive power than for generating electricity.

I'm afraid the only solution to any "sustainability" or "quality of life" question is to reduce the number of humans. Fortunately this can be done at no cost and with no sacrifice or hardship, by simply making fewer babies. The problem is that nobody can make a profit by telling people that they can live better by doing nothing.   
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.029 seconds with 24 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.