The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Technology
Can a vacuum be used to create a faster radiation warning system?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Can a vacuum be used to create a faster radiation warning system?
3 Replies
3671 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
McKay
(OP)
Sr. Member
164
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Can a vacuum be used to create a faster radiation warning system?
«
on:
21/05/2014 08:49:01 »
We cant make have a signal bout EM radiation danger that arrives to us before the radiation itself.. or can we?
Obviously, we cant have have a signal traveling faster thn c, BUT the fact that we live in atmosphere means tht radiation propagates slower than c.
So, perhaps, we can have a, basically, vacuum pipe closed with a seal that is transculent to whatever we want to detect, facibg outward with the detector qt the closest end. The radiation will travel faster trough the pipe than trough air. I calculate that for a 10 meter pipe/ distance there would be a lag of 970 microseconds (almost a milisecond). For 100m that would be almost 10 ms.
That sure aint much, but I am wondering, could anything benifit from such a warning system? Perhaps its enough time to prepare some systems for a EMP, flicking a switch or soething.
Particle radiation would be even slower..
«
Last Edit: 04/06/2014 11:44:24 by Georgia
»
Logged
McKay
(OP)
Sr. Member
164
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Re: Early warning for radiation
«
Reply #1 on:
21/05/2014 09:02:20 »
Sorry, im off by a factor - it is 970 microseconds for 100 meters
Logged
evan_au
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
11035
Activity:
9%
Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Early warning for radiation
«
Reply #2 on:
21/05/2014 13:08:21 »
Electromagnetic radiation travels at around 3x10
8
m/s in a vacuum.
According to my calculations, this works out at 0.3us per 100m= 100m/3x10
8
m/s.
The
refractive index
of air is 1.000277, which means that a burst of light will travel through air at a speed of 3x10
8
/1.000277, which will arrive later over 100m by 0.1 ns =0.0001us = 100m/3x10
8
m/s x (1.000277-1)
0.1ns is not a lot of time to shut down equipment.
What is worse, this giant vacuum tube will allow a blast of dangerous radiation to penetrate your bunker, quickly followed by a burst of particles which have
not
been slowed or absorbed by the atmosphere.
During early atomic bomb testing, scientists wanted to measure the spectrum of radiation produced by the blast, so they built an airtight tube, several kilometers long and filled with Hydrogen (if I remember correctly). This was apparently on the theory that the relatively simple atomic structure of hydrogen would create the least distortion of the spectrum. But I guess they knew when the explosion was going to happen, so they weren't so interested in early warning.
Logged
McKay
(OP)
Sr. Member
164
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Re: Early warning for radiation
«
Reply #3 on:
21/05/2014 14:01:48 »
Ah, yes, sorry again. My calculations are WAY of. Whatwas I thinking?
Hmm, ok, so a 0.1ns - not much indeed
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...