The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
The Environment
How close are IPPC reports fit to climate?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
How close are IPPC reports fit to climate?
2 Replies
4107 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
yor_on
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
81626
Activity:
100%
Thanked: 178 times
(Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
How close are IPPC reports fit to climate?
«
on:
21/07/2014 00:42:04 »
This is the new IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/
This is what the Guardian has to say about it.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/may/15/ipcc-un-climate-reports-diluted-protect-fossil-fuel-interests
It's tricky isn't it? I mean, political pressures, and economic interest groups lobbying, is a way of life it seems. The more clout you have the more people listen to you. Assuming it is correct, where is the threshold for direct lying?
http://www.robertstavinsblog.org/2014/04/25/is-the-ipcc-government-approval-process-broken-2/
«
Last Edit: 21/07/2014 00:45:04 by yor_on
»
Logged
URGENT: Naked Scientists website is under threat.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
21162
Activity:
63.5%
Thanked: 60 times
Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: How close are IPPC reports fit to climate?
«
Reply #1 on:
21/07/2014 23:59:16 »
Or maybe not. Climate modelling depends on a whole lot of entirely fictitious "historical" data which remarkably happens to fit the consensus view of causation....sort of....at least if it's massaged a bit and some of the inconvenient facts are ignored, that is...
One simple fact: the discovery of 500-year-old bromeliads under a retreating glacier. Headline: GLACIER RETREATING - WORLD GETTING HOTTER. Obvious truth: it must have been a lot hotter 500 years ago for the bromeliad to grow there in the first place. But you won't get any public research funding for pointing out that the IPCC consensus is wrong, because it is politically very useful.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
yor_on
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
81626
Activity:
100%
Thanked: 178 times
(Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: How close are IPPC reports fit to climate?
«
Reply #2 on:
27/07/2014 21:31:06 »
Tried to look that headline up, without luck, Alan. But glaciers can grow and retreat, it all depends on the circumstances. You can have differing climates regionally even when there's a whole different climate change overall. If you still have the link I would be pleased to read it.
And climate has its ups and downs too
"The Norse established their settlements along fjords (such as the Tunuliarfik and Aniaaq fjords in the central area of the Eastern settlement). Because this was during the so-called Medieval Warm Period, the vegetation there was very different from what it is today. Excavations have shown that the fjords at that time were surrounded by forests of 4-to 6-metre-tall birch trees and by hills covered with grass and willow brush."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Greenland
Logged
URGENT: Naked Scientists website is under threat.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...