The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Are they right about the G2 gas cloud?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Are they right about the G2 gas cloud?

  • 2 Replies
  • 3405 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Are they right about the G2 gas cloud?
« on: 06/12/2014 00:05:33 »
The latest news can be found at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141106-space-g2-black-hole-science/

What about the conclusions that they reached? The star is assumed to be relatively small in cosmological terms so why would it not shed its cloud of gas due to strong tidal forces. Does this really make sense or do we misunderstand gravity?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81604
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: Are they right about the G2 gas cloud?
« Reply #1 on: 06/12/2014 19:40:53 »
I don't even know how they can be so sure it didn't, well, partially at least?
How good is their resolution?

"The case for a massive black hole at the center of our Galaxy has been argued over the past few decades, however it has not been previously possible to prove this tantalizing hypothesis. In principle the stars in the vicinity of the Galactic Center can be used as ``test particles" to probe the for the presence of a central dark mass.

However, the density of stars in this region is so high that previous studies have reached an impasse due to limitations in angular resolution. With the ability to carry out diffraction-limited imaging at Keck, Prof. Ghez has mapped the Galactic Center with unprecedented angular resolution. These observations reveal stars moving at apparent speed as high as 12,000 km/sec (~4% the speed of light!) whose orbits implies the presence of 3.7 million times that mass of the Sun of dark matter interior to a radius of about 0.0002 pc (6 light hours or 600 Rs).

This exceeds volume averaged mass densities inferred for any other galaxy and leads to the conclusion that our Galaxy harbors a massive central black hole. If galaxies as inactive as our own support a central black hole, then one might assume that such objects can be found at the centers of all galaxies!"

I'm sure they see something, now assuming that it might be a star hidden inside the gas cloud they define. Whatever gravity such a wandering star has it has to counteract all tidal forces emanating from the massive black hole, if they are correct.
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81604
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: Are they right about the G2 gas cloud?
« Reply #2 on: 06/12/2014 19:43:22 »
Then again, wouldn't it depend on what type of black holes the star meets? Think I saw some ideas in where you might pass a event horizon without tidal forces?
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.289 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.