The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
That CAN'T be true!
Should weapons be tested on civilians before battlefield use?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Should weapons be tested on civilians before battlefield use?
2 Replies
6360 Views
3 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hadrian
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
2180
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Scallywag
Should weapons be tested on civilians before battlefield use?
«
on:
15/09/2006 18:49:08 »
September 12, 2006 CNN
<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="green"><b><font size="5">Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs</font id="size5"></b>
<font size="4">WASHINGTON (AP) -- Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before being used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.
The object is basically public relations. Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety considerations, said Secretary Michael Wynne.
"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne. "(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press."</font id="size4"></font id="green"></font id="Comic Sans MS">
More: <font size="1">
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.weapons.ap/index.html
</font id="size1">
<i><center><font size="1"><font color="blue">What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say. </font id="blue"></font id="size1"></center></i>
«
Last Edit: 27/07/2017 09:45:20 by
chris
»
Logged
Gaia
Sr. Member
397
Activity:
0%
Re: Should weapons be tested on civilians before battlefield use?
«
Reply #1 on:
15/09/2006 18:59:48 »
Not as far fetched as it sounds. I believe that many years ago they (the US authorities) released radioactive gas over the US to track its dispersion!
Then there's all the guck that they (and we) put in fast food and feed their/our own peeps and in other countries.
Gaia xxx
Logged
Gaia xxx
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." Anon.
Karen W.
Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
31886
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 41 times
"come fly with me"
Re: Should weapons be tested on civilians before battlefield use?
«
Reply #2 on:
15/09/2006 19:03:36 »
Curious? Is not a weapon intended to injure? I am confused!
Karen
Logged
"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
weapons
/
battlefield
/
civilians
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...