0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This experiment doesn't work in space either does it?
now do this experiment with different materials
simply-what evidence do we have.anal I know,but ive seen many things since theorizing this that is defeating this theory.dont forget that science theorises a lot about things about space.there is no proof that I know of that shows 2 objects of different sizes attracting one another due to GRAVITY.This experiment doesn't work in space either does it?
Quote from: gazza711 on 23/05/2015 19:25:31This experiment doesn't work in space either does it?What do you think keeps the moon orbiting the earth? Invisible string?
"ok.cavendish experiment is using an insulator(foam)which is "Exactly what sort of foam do you think Cavendish was using over two hundred years ago?Also, over the sort of time scales involved in these experiments, static charges would leak away before they had any effect.Why do you think otherwise?"maybe causing a dowsing effect.this is still theorised and accepted but not proven.gave science indication." Do you understand that dowsing has never been shown to be a real effect?
Usually, you don't find water in the desert- that's the thing about them.[/size]You certainly do not find it by dowsing.Nobody has ever tested it properly and found it to work.I'm intrigues that you saw the Cavendish experiment on you tube.Recently, YouTube celebrated it's tenth anniversary.Cavendish did his experiments two hundred years earlier.Do you really think he had a video camera?So; answer the question.What foam did Cavendish use about 150 years before it was invented?Also, do you understand that, even if he had magically got some sent back in time, it's still not a good enough insulator to retain a static charge for the duration of the experiments he did?
Quote from: gazza711simply-what evidence do we have.anal I know,but ive seen many things since theorizing this that is defeating this theory.dont forget that science theorises a lot about things about space.there is no proof that I know of that shows 2 objects of different sizes attracting one another due to GRAVITY.This experiment doesn't work in space either does it?There's an enormous amount of experimental facts and observations which demonstrates the existence of gravity. Originally Newton first demonstrated its existence by being able describe the motion of the planets by postulating the existence of a gravitational force F = GMm/r2 between any two objects whose distance between the bodies and the size of each body are such that each can be considered to be a particle. It also works for a point charge anywhere outside a spherically symmetric massive body. The Cavendish experiment demonstrated this was also true for objects of much smaller sizes. Every single experiment that has ever been done to verify Newton's law of gravitation has been proved correct within its domain of applicability and no experiment has ever been done to prove it's wrong within its domain of applicability.Read about - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity#Newton.27s_theory_of_gravitationYou claim "there is no proof that I know of that shows 2 objects of different sizes attracting one another due to GRAVITY" which only demonstrates that you don't know a lot about gravitational experiments.You claim that Im not a scientist, But seen too many things in front of me that disprove attraction. which doesn't really mean that it's disproved but that you don't understand it, that's all.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/05/2015 19:41:01Usually, you don't find water in the desert- that's the thing about them.[/size]You certainly do not find it by dowsing.Nobody has ever tested it properly and found it to work.I'm intrigues that you saw the Cavendish experiment on you tube.Recently, YouTube celebrated it's tenth anniversary.Cavendish did his experiments two hundred years earlier.Do you really think he had a video camera?So; answer the question.What foam did Cavendish use about 150 years before it was invented?Also, do you understand that, even if he had magically got some sent back in time, it's still not a good enough insulator to retain a static charge for the duration of the experiments he did?there is plenty of water in most deserts. you just have to dig deep enough. Ive seen it. Surely sand people back in the day didn't just decide to settle in these areas because of unknown reasons.Im not stating facts or trying not to, Im mearly debating science that has been proven to be flawed many a time.
..wasn't there a greek astronomer which new what newton did beforehand.
I feel newton just explained his findings.
Before newton, many knew of the movements of the stars.
The fact that they saw these events and recorded them, and then newton using historic evidence and an apple gave him the theory of which Einstein offered another explanation.
If newton hadn't said what he did, would we be stuck with einsteins theory.
you must remember that an illusionist can convince an audience because he understands the trick.
This was 150 years ago. didn't even have cars.
I would love to see a working example of the exact experiment,then I will shut my trap for a month.
wasn't there a greek astronomer which new what newton did beforehand.I feel newton just explained his findings.
the moons atmosphere is made from sodium...so why does the moon attract water(salty water infact)
Tycho Brahe was Danish, and produced measurements of the positions of the planets that were far more accurate than any previously recorded. Johannes Kepler was German, and used Tycho's measurements to deduce that planets followed elliptical orbits. Newton (and others at the time) showed that the only force that could produce this path is an inverse square law. Newton acknowledged his predecessors when he wrote in a letter that "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants".