The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Photons attracting planets
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Photons attracting planets

  • 8 Replies
  • 6680 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daveshorts (OP)

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • *****
  • 2568
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physics, Experiments
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Photons attracting planets
« on: 17/12/2006 12:12:41 »
I got asked this quesiton on e-mail:

Quote
Have you tested that photons attract a planet? If not, why do you think they do?
 I hope you can answer my questions,

I personally haven't, I was never that kind of physicist, however astronomers have noticed gravitaional lensing, this is where light is deflected by a massive body, like a planet or a star producing a distorted view behind.

I am fairly sure that the gravitational force from a bunch of photons has not been measured but

A photon has momentum so it it is changing in direction it must have experienced a force, and as far as we know forces are allways equal and opposite, as otherwise all sorts of strange things could happen. like you could build a rocket that needed no reaction mass and thus created energy.

eg If you had two mirrors with light bouncing between them attached onto one side of a mass, the photons are definitely attracted to the mass so they will hit the outer mirror less hard than the inner one creating a net force, if the mass is not attracted to the photons the whole object will experience a net force and accelerate.
[diagram=46_0]
This seems unlikely and I am sure it has consequences that could be measured. So the odds are photons attract masses the same amount as they are attracted to the masses.
Logged
 



Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Re: Photons attracting planets
« Reply #1 on: 17/12/2006 15:09:47 »
According to GR, not only mass curves space, energy and momentum too:

G_mu_nu = 8π T_mu_nu.

G_mu_nu is the curvature tensor (it gives the space-time curvature)
T_mu_nu is the stress-energy-momentum tensor (it gives the mass, energy and momentum density)

So light do produce a gravitational field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_equation
« Last Edit: 17/12/2006 15:13:57 by lightarrow »
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Re: Photons attracting planets
« Reply #2 on: 22/12/2006 10:35:24 »
A very interesting proposition although in earth type gravitiational fields the effect woould be extremely small.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline Atomic-S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 981
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 19 times
Re: Photons attracting planets
« Reply #3 on: 23/12/2006 02:23:34 »
If you could focus enough light is a small enough space, maybe it would self-disappear into a black hole.
Logged
 
 

Offline ghh

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 48
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Photons attracting planets
« Reply #4 on: 25/12/2006 21:00:50 »
T_mu_nu is the stress-energy-momentum tensor (it gives the mass, energy and momentum density)

So light do produce a gravitational field.

I did this in my "one particle" (see new theories)
the gravitational force exerted by a photon is proportional to h/c^2=m. so mm/r^2 does not become significant unless the wavelength is very small r = ~10^-21 metres (light is 10^-6)
Graham
Logged
 
 



Offline McQueen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 763
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Photons attracting planets
« Reply #5 on: 09/02/2008 10:23:01 »
You are right man, gravity is just photons!!! Just think about it the gravitational force is 1040 times less than the electromagnetic force. Have you any conception of what that number means??? It has to do with some kind of virtual photon alignment and nothing else!!!
Logged
Sometimes a concept is baffling not because it is profound but because it is wrong.?
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Photons attracting planets
« Reply #6 on: 09/02/2008 16:22:43 »
Quote from: Atomic-S on 23/12/2006 02:23:34
If you could focus enough light is a small enough space, maybe it would self-disappear into a black hole.

The trouble is that the black hole that is that small would evaporate/explode almost as quickly as you create it.

The other problem is that you would need a very short wavelength of EM radiation to be able to keep the photons contained in the space - that is a great deal of energy (although that higher energy would also have a greater mass).

One interesting question arising from this is, given the weakness of gravity, at what energy would the gravity of a photon become significant (although I would suspect that photons at that energy would have sufficient energy to be creating matter/anti-matter pairs)?
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Photons attracting planets
« Reply #7 on: 09/02/2008 16:42:42 »
Quote from: another_someone on 09/02/2008 16:22:43
Quote from: Atomic-S on 23/12/2006 02:23:34
If you could focus enough light is a small enough space, maybe it would self-disappear into a black hole.
One interesting question arising from this is, given the weakness of gravity, at what energy would the gravity of a photon become significant (although I would suspect that photons at that energy would have sufficient energy to be creating matter/anti-matter pairs)?

I would imagine the answer would be the Planck mass. I say that because, as far as I'm aware, it would have to act at the Planck scale in order for the EM force & gravity to interact directly, and that means you would need Planck scale mass/energy.

Now tell me I'm a dumbo and I've got that totally wrong  [:(]
« Last Edit: 09/02/2008 16:45:32 by DoctorBeaver »
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Photons attracting planets
« Reply #8 on: 10/02/2008 09:54:43 »
It is generally accpted that there is an upper limit to photon energy when the energy of the photon effectivley vanishes into a black hole but I can't remember exactly what that energy is but its around the planck length and time
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.344 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.