0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Alcubierre Warp Drive.
While searching I discovered this post and decided to register an account just to say how compelling I find this idea of space time as a fluid directly interacting with matter.
You really need to read this before continuing down this path.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluid_vacuum_theory
I happened to come across this post while frustrated that I just don't feel I have been given a complete explanation of the concept of Gravity, particularly when it comes to why matter actually distorts space-time and has an effect on it at all. While searching I discovered this post and decided to register an account just to say how compelling I find this idea of space time as a fluid directly interacting with matter.
I think it would definitely be possible to represent this idea in a very interesting way in terms of visualization. Perhaps the common example of one mass orbiting another, representing matter as these solid spherical masses, but representing the flow of space-time as a visible and dense volume of particles in 3D space, flowing into these spherical masses. With even the most simple fluid sim visualization, say a simple fluid flowing in one direction over a spherical shape, extremely interesting patterns of vortices and waves, and overall having a large effect on the entire volume of fluid.
you are trying to do a concept that Jeffrey as already pointed out exists with the link.
Quote from: Thebox on 07/01/2016 10:33:41you are trying to do a concept that Jeffrey as already pointed out exists with the link.And this obviously upsets you some how....Strange... Do I dare ask why?
If a Proton is negative then so are quarks, so negatives are attracted to negatives? a complete opposite to what we think.
Where in this Universe did you manage to find a negative Proton?As for the rest; No comment.
cant post maths so done it in bitmap E=<r1 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Why are you using the equation for the volume of a sphere?
Space time is tenseless, you cannot treat it as a moveable object just because you can treat it as a fabric, sure it can be bent or stretched however there is no motion through space time yet alone motion of space time, that would imply more space and more time is being created, but this is where your "space time recycles" solution comes in right? What I understood is, if earth exists in space time and causes space time to be pulled to in its center radiantly inwards thus resulting on a push on you and explain why you're stuck on a ground and geodesics exist, it suggests more and more space time is being added to earth's center, and this is where space time is being recycled right, so in such a way no new extra space is being created right? Well the issue I have with that, letting the tenseless space time picture out of the way, is that I don't understand what mechanism you're suggesting for that recycle, you see an electron doesn't feed on space time (that's even paradoxical as electrons require time to evolve what does it even mean to absorb time) they feed on photons, if they were fed in space time that would mean you somehow convert energy from space time, and later on recycle that space time with extra energy? Sorry I will read your thread again tomorrow as I'm too tired right now and not very well focused, it is an interesting idea, promising? Nah, but then again I enjoy well thought and well imagined ideas. I should read also the comments but again, tomorrow:)
Maybe I chose the wrong Forum to post this...
Quote from: Space Flow on 07/01/2016 11:25:10Where in this Universe did you manage to find a negative Proton?As for the rest; No comment.History labelled them the wrong way around, the electron is actually the positive, the protons are negative. Positives repel positives fact, if Quarks were positive they would not ''stick'' together.added - positive does the work of expansionnegative does the work of contractiondon't believe me?gasesmetalsThermodynamics