0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The present is where we live and when you view an image it was from the past.
You do not see through anything. An image reaches your brain when it hits your eye. When you look at a tree the image comes to you, you do not see through space. A close image comes to you before a image at a further distance. The longer distance is further in the past. You do not see clear, your image is unobstructed.
Photoreceptors in the eye detect waves of a certain frequency range. How waves are transferred through space through is unknown but mass is required to create the waves. If mass is energy than photon virtual particles with a tail. If energy (dark mass energy) is the source of the transfer than it is a wave range of particles where the particles stay but continue the ripple through space. Both would be energy transfer.Either way light cannot be created without mass. Even virtual photons would lose mass from the proton which we do not measure so which is more likely?
Photo-receptors in the eye detect wave-lengths of a constant spectral nature ''through'' the coupling of a variable wave-length of the clear (white light). White light is not a mixture of frequencies, white light is a variable wave length. Spectral constants a temporal interference pattern of the variable y-axis. Space is transparent , this allows also ''transparent'' to sight. (allows sight to pass through). Anything that is transparent allows light to pass through and also allows sight to pass through.
You have some strange ideas..I like that. Not saying I agree with them, but I like the thinking outside "Thebox".Still pretty strange though... Hard to wrap understanding around...
Quote from: Space Flow on 31/12/2015 10:18:44You have some strange ideas..I like that. Not saying I agree with them, but I like the thinking outside "Thebox".Still pretty strange though... Hard to wrap understanding around...I only understand it because it is my own idea, I understand it is hard to imagine or vision, if you can imagine being submerged in an ocean, then water is touching your eye ball, if the water was clear, you could see objects ''through'' the water, the water is transparent to sight and light. The water would be touching your eye ball and touching the object, a coupling between your eye and the object. So then advance on that thought and rise above the water into relative space, space touches your eye ball and touches the object , relative to you it is space that is coupling your sight to an object by noticing something of solidity in a vast of ''convertual'' stuff
An image only couples to your eye when the image reaches your eye and your brain creates the image. The image moves to you. In space where there is no light your photo receptors are not engaged and remain blank. Nothing reaches out from your eye to couple. Its Relativity of simultaneity.
Ok
I understand the Ok, it does sound like a vivid imagination, however can you answer this?Can science prove that light exists externally, beyond the human experience of the brain ? I believe the answer is no.
Can you prove you are alive?
Quote from: GoC on 07/01/2016 14:30:52Can you prove you are alive? yes we can prove we are conscious and aware (alive), we as animals can change velocity, no other things in the Universe has this choice. Other things go where ever the physics commands them to go, we go were we can travel opposing forces etc. We are detached from everything else, we are different to everything else, we do not belong here in this universe, we are the only oddities.
We do not do anything to break the laws of physics. We create a force to counter resistance using physics. We are no different than a computer controlled machine. Like all computers we have to wait for the light of the sun to reach our pupils to receive the information about the suns position in the past. Each still frame is a wavelength thick. We view a motion picture by receiving still frames at the speed of light.
We create inferior machines based on our own minds, we are nothing like a machine, we break every law of physics, we have choice, a rock does not.
Yes information is received by the brain by the use of the Electromagnetic radiation clear constant we are ''submerged'' in while we perceive it to be light. nobody can prove ''light'' exists externally outside the brain as light, it could be darkness outside of our brains.
Einstein considered light from a distance planet taking ''time'' to travel , so reconciled that we were not actually seeing the planet in its exact geometrical location, but what Einstein did not consider that the light from the observer takes the exact same time to travel to the planet
If you travelled to the planet you would arrive at the planet in the near future, however if you transported there at an instant, you would still be in the now moment and not a future,
the only conceivable future is that of another reasoning, if there was a sister planet to the earth that was lets say 1000,000,000 years older than Earth, the people there would be more evolved and a future us
Obviously self aware does not violate physics and a computer is much faster at math then I am. My calculation of numbers is inferior to a computer.
if you travel left and I travel right, the linearity remains the same of the observation, there is no displacement of the linear observation,