The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why are some frequencies of light unable to excite electrons around atoms?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why are some frequencies of light unable to excite electrons around atoms?

  • 2 Replies
  • 3884 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline memoryerase1 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
Why are some frequencies of light unable to excite electrons around atoms?
« on: 31/12/2015 23:17:04 »
If the frequency of incident light is too weak, the electron does not get excited and does not move from the lowest energy band. But this low frequency of light is to weak to see through a opaque object around four inches thick, though right. The electron will not get exited, and move to a higher energy band, but light is passing through the solid opaque object.

So could you see through the solid opaque object up to a few mm or less, or not at all.

Thank you for your help.
« Last Edit: 02/01/2016 10:57:56 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: If the frequency of light is too weak the electron does not get exited?
« Reply #1 on: 01/01/2016 22:12:37 »
Quote from: memoryerase1
see through an opaque object
This is something of a contradiction, since opaque means that you can't see through it .
- 4 inches of wood is opaque to visible light (because light of different frequencies is absorbed, usually by exciting an electron in an atom).
- Metals are opaque, but for a different reason - light bounces off the metal (reflection), rather than being absorbed.
- You can't see through a translucent material (eg clouds, snow or sugar); these do not absorb the light (the electrons are not excited), but the light is scattered so much that it does not form an image.

If not otherwise stated, you would assume that someone is talking about seeing through an object with visible light. However, there are other kinds of light, such as X-Rays.  4 inches of wood is opaque to visible light but is transparent to X-Rays.

Quote
light is too weak
This can mean several different things:
When we say the light is weak, we usually mean that the intensity is low (eg the light source is far away), without changing the frequency.
When we are considering interactions between light and electrons, what matters is the energy of the photon, and energy is proportional to frequency.

I am assuming that you are discussing this second meaning of "weak".

Quote
If the frequency of light is too weak the electron does not get excited?
If you have hydrogen gas at room temperature, it is transparent to visible light. This is because it takes an ultraviolet photon (which is more energetic) to excite an electron from the ground state to a higher energy level.

If you take very high energy photons (eg X-Rays), the Hydrogen is again transparent.

However, if you have very hot hydrogen gas, where a considerable number of electrons are no longer in the ground state, visible photons do have enough energy to excite the electron to a higher energy level. And if you heat it to a plasma, it is opaque to ultraviolet, visible and infra-red frequencies.

Even for Hydrogen gas at room temperature, infra-red photons (with less energy than visible photons) are able to be absorbed and emitted, by triggering changes in the rotation and vibration of molecules. So for some infra-red frequencies, hydrogen is no longer transparent.

For pure materials (like Hydrogen gas), there are particular frequencies that are absorbed, and other frequencies which are transparent, so you can see through them by choosing the right frequency of light. For complex materials like wood, there are many different frequencies that are absorbed by many different chemical compounds, somewhere in the material.

The most ideal "black body" is probably carbon, as it is able to absorb every ultraviolet, visible and infra-red frequency (but X-Rays are still transmitted, to some extent).

If you want a material that can be selectively opaque and transparent, try a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), as used on smartphones and thin-screen TVs.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: memoryerase1

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Why are some frequencies of light unable to excite electrons around atoms?
« Reply #2 on: 05/01/2016 11:21:06 »
Quote
Why are some frequencies of light unable to excite electrons around atoms?
Electrons are most likely to be excited if the energy of the incoming photon exactly matches the energy difference between an electron's current orbital, and another vacant orbital in the same atom.

If the photon has a higher frequency, or a lower frequency (ie a different frequency), the electron is very unlikely to absorb the photon and move to a higher orbital.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: memoryerase1



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.431 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.